The middleman dilemma: exploring the relationship between formal ethics and ethics in practice among real estate agents in Sweden

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Rickard Engström, Inga-Lill Söderberg
{"title":"The middleman dilemma: exploring the relationship between formal ethics and ethics in practice among real estate agents in Sweden","authors":"Rickard Engström, Inga-Lill Söderberg","doi":"10.1108/jerer-05-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between formal ethics and ethics in practice in the empirical context of real estate agents (REAs) working in the residential housing market, including owner-occupied houses and owner-occupied apartments, in Sweden. The paper investigates problems with the Swedish middleman model of real estate agency with regard to the acceptance among REAs of borderline professional behavior.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>We report on a survey distributed to all Swedish licensed residential REAs to investigate their attitudes towards eight scenarios displaying borderline ethical behavior. Firstly, the means of each scenario were calculated, investigating signs of distance between formal ethics and ethics in practice. Secondly, logistic regressions were run for each scenario separately, thereby investigating factors affecting misconduct among REAs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The empirical results show a clear difference between formal ethics and ethics in practice and also illustrate that some scenarios of borderline ethical behavior are creating greater problems for the REAs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>In Sweden, the seller is the principal, assigning the REA to sell a house or apartment, but the regulation is clear on the role of the licensed REA as responsible for promoting an informed and fair sales process where the buyer is safe to act without their own representative. Our study contributes with information to policymakers on possible areas for the development of the middleman model.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper is the first to empirically investigate the middleman model of a Swedish real estate agency in relation to the business ethics of the agents. The use of scenarios in close relation to the everyday working context of REAs as tests of ethics of practice is also of original methodological value to investigate possible diversions of professionals from national regulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Real Estate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jerer-05-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between formal ethics and ethics in practice in the empirical context of real estate agents (REAs) working in the residential housing market, including owner-occupied houses and owner-occupied apartments, in Sweden. The paper investigates problems with the Swedish middleman model of real estate agency with regard to the acceptance among REAs of borderline professional behavior.

Design/methodology/approach

We report on a survey distributed to all Swedish licensed residential REAs to investigate their attitudes towards eight scenarios displaying borderline ethical behavior. Firstly, the means of each scenario were calculated, investigating signs of distance between formal ethics and ethics in practice. Secondly, logistic regressions were run for each scenario separately, thereby investigating factors affecting misconduct among REAs.

Findings

The empirical results show a clear difference between formal ethics and ethics in practice and also illustrate that some scenarios of borderline ethical behavior are creating greater problems for the REAs.

Practical implications

In Sweden, the seller is the principal, assigning the REA to sell a house or apartment, but the regulation is clear on the role of the licensed REA as responsible for promoting an informed and fair sales process where the buyer is safe to act without their own representative. Our study contributes with information to policymakers on possible areas for the development of the middleman model.

Originality/value

The paper is the first to empirically investigate the middleman model of a Swedish real estate agency in relation to the business ethics of the agents. The use of scenarios in close relation to the everyday working context of REAs as tests of ethics of practice is also of original methodological value to investigate possible diversions of professionals from national regulations.

中间人困境:探索瑞典房地产经纪人的正式道德规范与实践道德规范之间的关系
本文的目的是在瑞典住宅市场(包括业主自住房屋和业主自住公寓)工作的房地产经纪人(REAs)的经验背景下,探讨正式道德规范与实践道德规范之间的关系。本文调查了瑞典房地产中介中间人模式中存在的问题,以及房地产经纪人对边缘职业行为的接受程度。设计/方法/途径我们向瑞典所有持证住宅房地产经纪人发放了一份调查问卷,调查他们对八种显示边缘道德行为的情景的态度。首先,我们计算了每种情景的平均值,以调查正式道德规范与实践道德规范之间的距离。其次,对每种情况分别进行逻辑回归,从而调查影响注册房地产经纪人不当行为的因素。实证结果表明,正式道德规范与实践中的道德规范之间存在明显差异,同时也说明某些道德行为边缘化的情况给注册房地产经纪人造成了更大的问题。实践意义在瑞典,卖方是委托人,委托 REA 出售房屋或公寓,但法规明确规定了持证 REA 的作用,即负责促进知情和公平的销售过程,让买方在没有自己的代表的情况下也能安全行事。我们的研究为政策制定者提供了有关中间人模式可能发展领域的信息。原创性/价值 本文首次对瑞典房地产中介公司的中间人模式与经纪人商业道德的关系进行了实证研究。使用与房地产中介日常工作环境密切相关的情景作为对执业道德的测试,对于调查专业人员可能偏离国家法规的情况也具有独创的方法论价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信