The Profoundest Interruption: In Defense of Distraction

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS
Caitlin Horrocks
{"title":"The Profoundest Interruption: In Defense of Distraction","authors":"Caitlin Horrocks","doi":"10.1353/sew.2024.a926969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Profoundest Interruption:<span>In Defense of Distraction</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Caitlin Horrocks (bio) </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p><em>Evil is whatever distracts</em>.</p> –Franz Kafka </blockquote> <p><strong>I</strong>’ve had this quote on my phone’s camera roll since September 2021, when I saw it written on a sandwich board sign outside a skate shop in my neighborhood. Kafka’s declaration stopped me in my tracks: <em>Evil? Really? Maybe? I hope not</em>. I took a photo so I could keep thinking about it. Then I mostly tried not to think about it. I had, at the time, highly distracting one-year-old twins, plus a nearly-as-distracting five-year-old, plus the various distractions of constant daycare-borne illnesses and work and life and the friends my husband and I almost never saw and missed, and the writing projects we had no time for, and missed. Still, I did not think of those things as <em>evil</em>.</p> <p>Trying to focus on something despite the pings of notifications or the mental buzzing of our own worries, through the physical demands of needy children or of our own bodies, seems to me a <strong>[End Page 344]</strong> near-universal experience in our current age. But the relationship of distraction to creativity or contemplation is usually viewed as a straightforward obstacle or personal weakness to be overcome. The “proper” response to distraction is resistance. To meet it willingly, with abandon, is the capitulation of a lazy mind. Distraction can be destructive, keeping us splashing always in the shallows. But rather than Kafka, the quote I <em>want</em> to believe comes from a poem entitled “On Buzz Aldrin’s Birthday” by Marianne Chan:</p> <blockquote> <p><span>But the mind</span><span>has its sundry destinations</span><span>where it lands to find</span><span>sources of water.</span></p> </blockquote> <p>My mind has its sundry destinations, frankly, whether I want it to or not, and I would like to believe that there is water there, rather than barren doomscroll desert.</p> <p>When I could finally bring myself to think again about that quote on the sign, what I wanted was a loophole, some version of #notalldistractions. I found what I needed in <em>Attention and Distraction in Modern German Literature, Thought, and Culture</em> by Carolin Duttlinger, which discusses the lesser-known Kafka work of non-fiction, “Measures for Preventing Accidents from Wood-Planing Machines,” written for his day job at the Workers’ Accident Insurance Institute in 1910. In it, Kafka warns that industrial planing machines are so poorly designed, and the work conditions so inherently dangerous, that no level of vigilant attention can keep the worker completely safe, or even in possession of all his fingers. In general, Kafka’s insurance work treated moments of distraction, even those with physically disastrous consequences, as inevitable. As, Duttlinger puts it, “a statistical constant rather than a matter of personal responsibility.” <strong>[End Page 345]</strong></p> <p>Kafka’s fiction, as well as his diary entries and letters, also wrestles with distraction, but in conflicted and less forgiving ways. In the short story “The Hunter Gracchus,” the momentary distraction of a mountain goat causes the hunter to fall to his death. In his daily life, Kafka famously felt besieged by ordinary domestic noises. To a girl he was ostensibly courting, he wrote that his ideal mode of existence would be to live “in the innermost room of a spacious locked cellar with my writing things and a lamp. Food would be brought and always put down far away from my room, outside the cellar’s outermost door. . . . How I would write! From what depths I would drag it up! Without effort! For utmost concentration knows no effort.” The pairing of “drag it up” and “without effort” is striking to me, but Kafka knew what he was trying to describe: such a perfect state of creative flow had produced his short story “The Judgement,” written over the course of a single night in 1912. He spent the rest of his life attempting to re-achieve such a state of “utmost concentration.” But he also acknowledges that this would not be a sustainable state; the animal protagonist of a late career story, “The Burrow,” is eventually driven mad by the pursuit of a perfectly silent underground fortress.</p> <p>We may at least occasionally wish for someone to set our food...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43824,"journal":{"name":"SEWANEE REVIEW","volume":"132 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEWANEE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sew.2024.a926969","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Profoundest Interruption:In Defense of Distraction
  • Caitlin Horrocks (bio)

Evil is whatever distracts.

–Franz Kafka

I’ve had this quote on my phone’s camera roll since September 2021, when I saw it written on a sandwich board sign outside a skate shop in my neighborhood. Kafka’s declaration stopped me in my tracks: Evil? Really? Maybe? I hope not. I took a photo so I could keep thinking about it. Then I mostly tried not to think about it. I had, at the time, highly distracting one-year-old twins, plus a nearly-as-distracting five-year-old, plus the various distractions of constant daycare-borne illnesses and work and life and the friends my husband and I almost never saw and missed, and the writing projects we had no time for, and missed. Still, I did not think of those things as evil.

Trying to focus on something despite the pings of notifications or the mental buzzing of our own worries, through the physical demands of needy children or of our own bodies, seems to me a [End Page 344] near-universal experience in our current age. But the relationship of distraction to creativity or contemplation is usually viewed as a straightforward obstacle or personal weakness to be overcome. The “proper” response to distraction is resistance. To meet it willingly, with abandon, is the capitulation of a lazy mind. Distraction can be destructive, keeping us splashing always in the shallows. But rather than Kafka, the quote I want to believe comes from a poem entitled “On Buzz Aldrin’s Birthday” by Marianne Chan:

But the mindhas its sundry destinationswhere it lands to findsources of water.

My mind has its sundry destinations, frankly, whether I want it to or not, and I would like to believe that there is water there, rather than barren doomscroll desert.

When I could finally bring myself to think again about that quote on the sign, what I wanted was a loophole, some version of #notalldistractions. I found what I needed in Attention and Distraction in Modern German Literature, Thought, and Culture by Carolin Duttlinger, which discusses the lesser-known Kafka work of non-fiction, “Measures for Preventing Accidents from Wood-Planing Machines,” written for his day job at the Workers’ Accident Insurance Institute in 1910. In it, Kafka warns that industrial planing machines are so poorly designed, and the work conditions so inherently dangerous, that no level of vigilant attention can keep the worker completely safe, or even in possession of all his fingers. In general, Kafka’s insurance work treated moments of distraction, even those with physically disastrous consequences, as inevitable. As, Duttlinger puts it, “a statistical constant rather than a matter of personal responsibility.” [End Page 345]

Kafka’s fiction, as well as his diary entries and letters, also wrestles with distraction, but in conflicted and less forgiving ways. In the short story “The Hunter Gracchus,” the momentary distraction of a mountain goat causes the hunter to fall to his death. In his daily life, Kafka famously felt besieged by ordinary domestic noises. To a girl he was ostensibly courting, he wrote that his ideal mode of existence would be to live “in the innermost room of a spacious locked cellar with my writing things and a lamp. Food would be brought and always put down far away from my room, outside the cellar’s outermost door. . . . How I would write! From what depths I would drag it up! Without effort! For utmost concentration knows no effort.” The pairing of “drag it up” and “without effort” is striking to me, but Kafka knew what he was trying to describe: such a perfect state of creative flow had produced his short story “The Judgement,” written over the course of a single night in 1912. He spent the rest of his life attempting to re-achieve such a state of “utmost concentration.” But he also acknowledges that this would not be a sustainable state; the animal protagonist of a late career story, “The Burrow,” is eventually driven mad by the pursuit of a perfectly silent underground fortress.

We may at least occasionally wish for someone to set our food...

最深刻的打断为分心辩护
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 最深刻的打断:为分心辩护》(The Profoundest Interruption:In Defense of Distraction)凯特琳-霍罗克斯(Caitlin Horrocks)(简历) 邪恶就是让人分心的东西。弗朗茨-卡夫卡(Franz Kafka) 从 2021 年 9 月起,我的手机相机胶卷里就有这句话,当时我看到它写在我家附近一家滑板店外的三明治板招牌上。卡夫卡的宣言让我停下了脚步:邪恶?真的吗?也许吧?但愿不是。我拍了一张照片,以便继续思考这个问题。然后,我尽量不去想它。当时,我有一对让人非常分心的一岁大的双胞胎,还有一个几乎同样让人分心的五岁大的孩子,再加上托儿所里不断发生的疾病、工作、生活、我和丈夫几乎从未见过和错过的朋友,以及我们没有时间进行和错过的写作项目等各种分心的事情。尽管如此,我并不认为这些事情是邪恶的。我认为,在我们这个时代,努力专注于某件事情,尽管有通知的 "乒乒乓乓 "声或我们自己的烦恼在头脑中嗡嗡作响,尽管有需要帮助的孩子或我们自己的身体有生理需求,这似乎是[第 344 页完]一种近乎普遍的经历。但是,分心与创造力或沉思的关系通常被视为需要克服的直接障碍或个人弱点。对分心的 "正确 "反应是抵制。心甘情愿、不遗余力地迎接它,是懒惰心灵的屈服。分心可能具有破坏性,让我们总是在浅滩上溅起水花。但我想相信的不是卡夫卡的名言,而是玛丽安-陈的一首题为《在巴兹-奥尔德林的生日》的诗: 但心灵有其不同的目的地,在那里它可以找到水源。 坦率地说,无论我是否愿意,我的思想都有它的各种目的地,我愿意相信那里有水,而不是荒芜的末日沙漠。当我终于可以让自己再次思考标牌上的那句话时,我想要的是一个漏洞,一些#notalldistractions的版本。我在卡洛琳-杜特林格(Carolin Duttlinger)所著的《现代德国文学、思想和文化中的注意力与分心》一书中找到了我需要的东西,该书讨论了卡夫卡鲜为人知的非虚构作品《防止刨木机事故的措施》,这是他 1910 年为工人事故保险协会的日常工作而写的。卡夫卡在书中警告说,工业刨木机的设计非常糟糕,工作条件本身也非常危险,任何程度的警惕都无法保证工人的完全安全,甚至无法保证工人的所有手指都不受伤害。总的来说,卡夫卡的保险作品将分心的时刻,甚至是那些会造成身体灾难性后果的时刻,视为不可避免的。正如杜特林格所说,"这是一个统计常数,而不是个人责任问题"。[End Page 345] 卡夫卡的小说以及他的日记和书信也与分心作斗争,但斗争的方式是矛盾的,不那么宽容。在短篇小说《猎人格雷库斯》中,山羊的一时分神导致猎人摔死。在他的日常生活中,卡夫卡有一个著名的感受,那就是被普通的家庭嘈杂声所包围。他在给一位表面上是他追求对象的女孩的信中写道,他理想的生活方式是 "住在一个上了锁的宽敞地窖的最里面的房间里,带着我的写作工具和一盏灯。食物会有人送来,而且总是放在离我房间很远的地方,就在地窖最外面的门外........ .我将如何写作?我会从多深的地方把它拽上来!不费吹灰之力!因为全神贯注是不费吹灰之力的"。在我看来,"把它拽上来 "和 "不费吹灰之力 "这两个词的搭配很引人注目,但卡夫卡知道他想描述什么:这种完美的创作状态曾成就了他在 1912 年一个晚上写成的短篇小说《审判》。他的余生都在试图重新达到这种 "全神贯注 "的状态。但他也承认,这种状态不会持久;在他晚年的一篇小说《洞穴》中,动物主人公最终被追逐一个完全安静的地下堡垒逼疯了。我们至少偶尔会希望有人为我们的食物......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SEWANEE REVIEW
SEWANEE REVIEW LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Having never missed an issue in 115 years, the Sewanee Review is the oldest continuously published literary quarterly in the country. Begun in 1892 at the University of the South, it has stood as guardian and steward for the enduring voices of American, British, and Irish literature. Published quarterly, the Review is unique in the field of letters for its rich tradition of literary excellence in general nonfiction, poetry, and fiction, and for its dedication to unvarnished no-nonsense literary criticism. Each volume is a mix of short reviews, omnibus reviews, memoirs, essays in reminiscence and criticism, poetry, and fiction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信