Abrasion Resistance and Microstructural Properties of Sustainable Geopolymer Mortar Produced with Hybrid Blends of GGBFS and Various Earth Materials

IF 2.9 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Nadhim Hamah Sor, Kasım Mermerdaş, Radhwan Alzeebaree, Şevin Ekmen, Esameddin Saed Mulapeer
{"title":"Abrasion Resistance and Microstructural Properties of Sustainable Geopolymer Mortar Produced with Hybrid Blends of GGBFS and Various Earth Materials","authors":"Nadhim Hamah Sor, Kasım Mermerdaş, Radhwan Alzeebaree, Şevin Ekmen, Esameddin Saed Mulapeer","doi":"10.1007/s13369-024-09088-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this experimental study was to investigate the impact of different earth precursors, partially substituted with ground-granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), at varying replacement levels of 0–25% with 5% increments, on abrasion resistance, SEM analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) tests after 90 days and compressive strength with dry density test at 28 days curing age. The precursors derived from waste aluminosilicate sources, such as metakaolin (MK), pumice powder (PP), waste ceramic powder (C), and bentonite (B), were utilized to produce GPMs. A total of 21 different combinations from four distinct series were produced. Depending on the results, it was found that all earth materials used had a positive effect on all properties at various replacement ratios. After 28 days, the mix containing 5% B reached its maximum strength of 64.15 MPa. The maximum values for abrasion resistance and compressive strength were obtained when the replacement level was 10% for all precursors, except bentonite, which achieved the best results at a replacement level of 5%. At a 25% replacement level, pumice powder showed superior performance on all properties compared to other precursors. Furthermore, the impact of the replacement level and precursor types was statistically evaluated using the two-way analysis of variance (MINITAB-ANOVA) technique. The statistical study showed that all variables had a substantial impact on the characteristics of the geopolymer mortar. The proposed geopolymer materials possess inherent stability, making them viable and sustainable substitutes for conventional construction materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8109,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09088-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this experimental study was to investigate the impact of different earth precursors, partially substituted with ground-granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), at varying replacement levels of 0–25% with 5% increments, on abrasion resistance, SEM analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) tests after 90 days and compressive strength with dry density test at 28 days curing age. The precursors derived from waste aluminosilicate sources, such as metakaolin (MK), pumice powder (PP), waste ceramic powder (C), and bentonite (B), were utilized to produce GPMs. A total of 21 different combinations from four distinct series were produced. Depending on the results, it was found that all earth materials used had a positive effect on all properties at various replacement ratios. After 28 days, the mix containing 5% B reached its maximum strength of 64.15 MPa. The maximum values for abrasion resistance and compressive strength were obtained when the replacement level was 10% for all precursors, except bentonite, which achieved the best results at a replacement level of 5%. At a 25% replacement level, pumice powder showed superior performance on all properties compared to other precursors. Furthermore, the impact of the replacement level and precursor types was statistically evaluated using the two-way analysis of variance (MINITAB-ANOVA) technique. The statistical study showed that all variables had a substantial impact on the characteristics of the geopolymer mortar. The proposed geopolymer materials possess inherent stability, making them viable and sustainable substitutes for conventional construction materials.

Abstract Image

用 GGBFS 和各种土质材料混合制成的可持续土工聚合物砂浆的耐磨性和微观结构特性
本实验研究的目的是调查不同土质前驱体(部分用磨碎高炉矿渣(GGBFS)替代)在不同替代水平(0-25%,递增 5%)下对 90 天后耐磨性、扫描电镜分析、傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和 X 射线衍射(XRD)测试以及 28 天固化龄期干密度抗压强度测试的影响。生产 GPM 的前体来源于废弃的铝硅酸盐,如偏高岭土(MK)、浮石粉(PP)、废弃陶瓷粉(C)和膨润土(B)。共生产出四个不同系列的 21 种不同组合。根据结果发现,在不同的替换比例下,所使用的所有土质材料都对所有性能产生了积极影响。28 天后,含 5% B 的混合料达到了 64.15 兆帕的最大强度。所有前驱体的耐磨性和抗压强度的最大值都是在替代率为 10%时获得的,但膨润土除外,它在替代率为 5%时达到了最佳效果。与其他前体相比,在 25% 的替代水平下,浮石粉在所有性能方面都表现出色。此外,还使用双向方差分析(MINITAB-ANOVA)技术对替代水平和前体类型的影响进行了统计评估。统计研究表明,所有变量都对土工聚合物砂浆的特性产生了重大影响。拟议的土工聚合物材料具有固有的稳定性,使其成为传统建筑材料可行且可持续的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) partnered with Springer to publish the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE). AJSE, which has been published by KFUPM since 1975, is a recognized national, regional and international journal that provides a great opportunity for the dissemination of research advances from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, MENA and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信