Optimization of inter-seasonal nitrogen allocation increases yield and resource-use efficiency in a water-limited wheat–maize cropping system in the North China Plain

Xiaonan Zhou, Chenghang Du, Haoran Li, Zhencai Sun, Yifei Chen, Zhiqiang Gao, Zhigan Zhao, Yinghua Zhang, Zhimin Wang, Ying Liu
{"title":"Optimization of inter-seasonal nitrogen allocation increases yield and resource-use efficiency in a water-limited wheat–maize cropping system in the North China Plain","authors":"Xiaonan Zhou, Chenghang Du, Haoran Li, Zhencai Sun, Yifei Chen, Zhiqiang Gao, Zhigan Zhao, Yinghua Zhang, Zhimin Wang, Ying Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cj.2024.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Winter wheat–summer maize cropping system in the North China Plain often experiences drought-induced yield reduction in the wheat season and rainwater and nitrogen (N) fertilizer losses in the maize season. This study aimed to identify an optimal interseasonal water- and N-management strategy to alleviate these losses. Four ratios of allocation of 360 kg N ha between the wheat and maize seasons under one-time presowing root-zone irrigation (W0) and additional jointing and anthesis irrigation (W2) in wheat and one irrigation after maize sowing were set as follows: N1 (120:240), N2 (180:180), N3 (240:120) and N4 (300:60). The results showed that under W0, the N3 treatment produced the highest annual yield, crop water productivity (WP), and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN). Increased N allocation in wheat under W0 improved wheat yield without affecting maize yield, as surplus nitrate after wheat harvest was retained in the topsoil layers and available for the subsequent maize. Under W2, annual yield was largest in the N2 treatment. The risk of nitrate leaching increased in W2 when N application rate in wheat exceeded that of the N2 treatment, especially in the wet year. Compared to W2N2, the W0N3 maintained 95.2% grain yield over two years. The WP was higher in the W0 treatment than in the W2 treatment. Therefore, following limited total N rate, an appropriate fertilizer N transfer from maize to wheat season had the potential of a “triple win” for high annual yield, WP and PFPN in a water-limited wheat–maize cropping system.","PeriodicalId":501058,"journal":{"name":"The Crop Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Crop Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2024.03.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Winter wheat–summer maize cropping system in the North China Plain often experiences drought-induced yield reduction in the wheat season and rainwater and nitrogen (N) fertilizer losses in the maize season. This study aimed to identify an optimal interseasonal water- and N-management strategy to alleviate these losses. Four ratios of allocation of 360 kg N ha between the wheat and maize seasons under one-time presowing root-zone irrigation (W0) and additional jointing and anthesis irrigation (W2) in wheat and one irrigation after maize sowing were set as follows: N1 (120:240), N2 (180:180), N3 (240:120) and N4 (300:60). The results showed that under W0, the N3 treatment produced the highest annual yield, crop water productivity (WP), and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN). Increased N allocation in wheat under W0 improved wheat yield without affecting maize yield, as surplus nitrate after wheat harvest was retained in the topsoil layers and available for the subsequent maize. Under W2, annual yield was largest in the N2 treatment. The risk of nitrate leaching increased in W2 when N application rate in wheat exceeded that of the N2 treatment, especially in the wet year. Compared to W2N2, the W0N3 maintained 95.2% grain yield over two years. The WP was higher in the W0 treatment than in the W2 treatment. Therefore, following limited total N rate, an appropriate fertilizer N transfer from maize to wheat season had the potential of a “triple win” for high annual yield, WP and PFPN in a water-limited wheat–maize cropping system.
在华北平原的限水小麦-玉米种植系统中,优化跨季氮素分配可提高产量和资源利用效率
华北平原的冬小麦-夏玉米种植系统在麦季经常出现干旱导致的减产,在玉米季经常出现雨水和氮肥损失。本研究旨在确定最佳的季节间水分和氮肥管理策略,以减少这些损失。在小麦播种前一次性根区灌溉(W0)和玉米播种后一次灌溉(W2)的情况下,设定了小麦和玉米两季间每公顷 360 千克氮的四种分配比例如下:N1(120:240)、N2(180:180)、N3(240:120)和 N4(300:60)。结果表明,在 W0 条件下,N3 处理的年产量、作物水分生产率(WP)和氮部分要素生产率(PFPN)最高。在 W0 条件下,增加小麦中的氮分配可提高小麦产量,但不影响玉米产量,因为小麦收获后剩余的硝酸盐保留在表土层,可供随后的玉米生长。在 W2 条件下,N2 处理的年产量最大。在 W2 条件下,当小麦的施氮量超过 N2 处理的施氮量时,硝酸盐沥滤的风险就会增加,尤其是在潮湿年份。与 W2N2 相比,W0N3 在两年中保持了 95.2% 的粮食产量。W0 处理的 WP 值高于 W2 处理。因此,在总氮量有限的情况下,从玉米到小麦季节的适当肥料氮转移有可能在水资源有限的小麦-玉米种植系统中实现年产量、WP 和 PFPN 的 "三赢"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信