Linking self-regulated learning to community of inquiry in online undergraduate courses: A person-centered approach

Chungsoo Na, Soojeong Jeong, Jody Clarke-Midura, Youngin Shin
{"title":"Linking self-regulated learning to community of inquiry in online undergraduate courses: A person-centered approach","authors":"Chungsoo Na, Soojeong Jeong, Jody Clarke-Midura, Youngin Shin","doi":"10.1007/s11423-024-10380-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has gained widespread recognition as a theoretical model for understanding student learning in online environments. Despite its prevalence, CoI has been critiqued for its limited emphasis on learners’ proactive roles in self-regulating their own learning. To address this, researchers have suggested integrating self-regulated learning (SRL) into the CoI framework. This integration calls for empirical research to explore the relationship between SRL and the three established CoI presences: teaching, social, and cognitive. Using a person-centered approach, this study examines how varying SRL skills among 750 undergraduate students in an online introductory mathematics course are related to the three CoI components. Latent profile analyses identified five distinct SRL profiles: <i>minimal regulators, low regulators with limited social skills, low regulators, moderate regulators, and competent regulators</i>. We found that students in higher SRL profiles demonstrated higher perception of CoI, whereas those in relatively lower SRL profiles showed lower levels of perceived CoI. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating self-regulation in the CoI framework for a more comprehensive understanding of online learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":501584,"journal":{"name":"Educational Technology Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Technology Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10380-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework has gained widespread recognition as a theoretical model for understanding student learning in online environments. Despite its prevalence, CoI has been critiqued for its limited emphasis on learners’ proactive roles in self-regulating their own learning. To address this, researchers have suggested integrating self-regulated learning (SRL) into the CoI framework. This integration calls for empirical research to explore the relationship between SRL and the three established CoI presences: teaching, social, and cognitive. Using a person-centered approach, this study examines how varying SRL skills among 750 undergraduate students in an online introductory mathematics course are related to the three CoI components. Latent profile analyses identified five distinct SRL profiles: minimal regulators, low regulators with limited social skills, low regulators, moderate regulators, and competent regulators. We found that students in higher SRL profiles demonstrated higher perception of CoI, whereas those in relatively lower SRL profiles showed lower levels of perceived CoI. Our findings underscore the importance of incorporating self-regulation in the CoI framework for a more comprehensive understanding of online learning.

Abstract Image

在在线本科课程中将自我调节学习与探究社区联系起来:以人为本的方法
探究社区(CoI)框架作为一种理解学生在网络环境中学习的理论模型,已得到广泛认可。尽管 CoI 框架很普遍,但它对学习者在自我调节学习中的主动作用强调有限,因而受到批评。为了解决这个问题,研究人员建议将自我调节学习(SRL)纳入 CoI 框架。这种整合要求开展实证研究,探索自律学习与三个既定的协同创新存在之间的关系:教学、社会和认知。本研究采用以人为本的方法,考察了在线数学入门课程中 750 名本科生不同的 SRL 技能与三个 CoI 要素之间的关系。通过潜在特征分析,我们发现了五种不同的自律学习能力特征:最低调节能力、社交能力有限的低调节能力、低调节能力、中等调节能力和胜任调节能力。我们发现,自律学习能力较高的学生表现出较高的协同作用感知,而自律学习能力相对较低的学生则表现出较低的协同作用感知。我们的发现强调了将自我调节纳入 CoI 框架的重要性,以便更全面地了解在线学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信