Eduardo Silva, Joana Iglésias, Pedro Lima, Luís F Antunes, Manuel Fonseca
{"title":"Pedal Acceleration Time An Alternative Tool To Ankle-Brachial Index In Peripheral Arterial Disease.","authors":"Eduardo Silva, Joana Iglésias, Pedro Lima, Luís F Antunes, Manuel Fonseca","doi":"10.48729/pjctvs.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is a well-established diagnostic tool for evaluating peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Limitations in its application led to the development of alternative diagnostic methods, including Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) and Transcutaneous Pressure of Oxygen (TcPO2), yet these are not as widely available as ABI. Recently, Pedal Acceleration Time (PAT), has gained popularity as a new tool to assess PAD, requiring only an ultrasound. This study seeks to further establish the correlation between ABI and PAT, determining whether PAT can be a reliable alternative for diagnosing and assessing the severity of PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ABI and PAT were measured in patients attending our consult with no history of vascular or endovascular surgery. Limbs with unmeasurable ABI were excluded. Patients were categorized into groups based on their PAD stage according to the Fontaine classification. Patient demographics, comorbidities and respective ABI and PAT were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients (114 limbs) were included in the study. Mean age 68 ± 11.7 years, 78.3% male and 33.3% diabetic patients. Fifty-three claudicant limbs (46.5%) and 26 limbs (22.8%) with chronic limb threatening ischemia. Pearson correlation coefficient between ABI and PAT, showed a strong negative correlation (r= -0.78; p<0.01). Mean ABI and PAT for limbs in Fontaine stage I were 0.94 ± 0.17 and 82.0 ± 27.4 ms; Fontaine stage IIa 0.69 ± 0.21 and 141.3 ± 57.8 ms; Fontaine stage IIb 0.54 ± 0.14 and 173.4 ± 65.1 ms; Fontaine stage III 0.43 ± 0.15 and 216 ± 33.2 ms; Fontaine stage IV 0.49 ± 0.17 and 206.7 ± 78.1 ms, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests an inverse correlation between ABI and PAT, in accordance with the findings published in the literature, thus supporting the use of PAT as an easily reproducible and efficient alternative to ABI for evaluating the severity of PAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":74480,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"29-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is a well-established diagnostic tool for evaluating peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Limitations in its application led to the development of alternative diagnostic methods, including Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) and Transcutaneous Pressure of Oxygen (TcPO2), yet these are not as widely available as ABI. Recently, Pedal Acceleration Time (PAT), has gained popularity as a new tool to assess PAD, requiring only an ultrasound. This study seeks to further establish the correlation between ABI and PAT, determining whether PAT can be a reliable alternative for diagnosing and assessing the severity of PAD.
Methods: ABI and PAT were measured in patients attending our consult with no history of vascular or endovascular surgery. Limbs with unmeasurable ABI were excluded. Patients were categorized into groups based on their PAD stage according to the Fontaine classification. Patient demographics, comorbidities and respective ABI and PAT were analysed.
Results: Sixty-nine patients (114 limbs) were included in the study. Mean age 68 ± 11.7 years, 78.3% male and 33.3% diabetic patients. Fifty-three claudicant limbs (46.5%) and 26 limbs (22.8%) with chronic limb threatening ischemia. Pearson correlation coefficient between ABI and PAT, showed a strong negative correlation (r= -0.78; p<0.01). Mean ABI and PAT for limbs in Fontaine stage I were 0.94 ± 0.17 and 82.0 ± 27.4 ms; Fontaine stage IIa 0.69 ± 0.21 and 141.3 ± 57.8 ms; Fontaine stage IIb 0.54 ± 0.14 and 173.4 ± 65.1 ms; Fontaine stage III 0.43 ± 0.15 and 216 ± 33.2 ms; Fontaine stage IV 0.49 ± 0.17 and 206.7 ± 78.1 ms, respectively.
Conclusion: Our study suggests an inverse correlation between ABI and PAT, in accordance with the findings published in the literature, thus supporting the use of PAT as an easily reproducible and efficient alternative to ABI for evaluating the severity of PAD.
简介踝肱指数(ABI)是评估外周动脉疾病(PAD)的成熟诊断工具。由于其应用上的局限性,人们开发了其他诊断方法,包括脚趾肱动脉指数(TBI)和经皮氧压(TcPO2),但这些方法并不像 ABI 那样普及。最近,踏板加速时间(PAT)作为一种新的评估 PAD 的工具受到欢迎,只需进行超声波检查即可。本研究旨在进一步确定 ABI 和 PAT 之间的相关性,确定 PAT 是否可以作为诊断和评估 PAD 严重程度的可靠替代方法:对无血管或血管内手术史的就诊患者进行 ABI 和 PAT 测量。排除了无法测量 ABI 的肢体。根据 Fontaine 分级法,患者的 PAD 分期被分为不同的组别。对患者的人口统计学特征、合并症以及各自的 ABI 和 PAT 进行了分析:研究共纳入 69 名患者(114 条肢体)。平均年龄(68 ± 11.7)岁,78.3%为男性,33.3%为糖尿病患者。53条跛行肢体(46.5%)和26条肢体(22.8%)患有慢性肢体缺血。ABI 和 PAT 之间的皮尔逊相关系数显示出很强的负相关(r= -0.78;pConclusion):我们的研究表明,ABI 和 PAT 之间存在负相关,这与文献中发表的研究结果一致,因此支持使用 PAT 作为 ABI 的替代方法,以评估 PAD 的严重程度。