Assessment of visual problems after acquired brain injury: a survey of current practice in Danish hospitals.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Trine Schow, Eike Ines Wehling, Helle K Falkenberg, Anne Norup, Karin Spangsberg Kristensen
{"title":"Assessment of visual problems after acquired brain injury: a survey of current practice in Danish hospitals.","authors":"Trine Schow, Eike Ines Wehling, Helle K Falkenberg, Anne Norup, Karin Spangsberg Kristensen","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.28793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore current hospital practice in relation to the assessment of vision problems in patients with acquired brain injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 143 respondents from hospital settings, with background in occupational therapy and physical therapy, participated in the survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey questionnaire, developed collaboratively by Danish and Norwegian research groups, encompassed 22 items categorically covering \"Background information\", \"Clinical experience and current practice\", \"Vision assessment tools and protocols\", and \"Assessment barriers\". It was sent out online, to 29 different hospital departments and 18 separate units for occupational therapists and physiotherapists treating patients with acquired brain injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents worked in acute or subacute hospital settings. Few departments had an interdisciplinary vision team, and very few therapists had formal education in visual problems after acquired brain injury. Visual assessment practices varied, and there was limited use of standardized tests. Barriers to identifying visual problems included patient-related challenges, knowledge gaps, and resource limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasized the need for enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, formal education, and standardized assessments to address visual problems after acquired brain injury. Overcoming these challenges may improve identification and management, ultimately contributing to better patient care and outcomes in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.28793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore current hospital practice in relation to the assessment of vision problems in patients with acquired brain injury.

Design: A survey study.

Subjects: A total of 143 respondents from hospital settings, with background in occupational therapy and physical therapy, participated in the survey.

Methods: The survey questionnaire, developed collaboratively by Danish and Norwegian research groups, encompassed 22 items categorically covering "Background information", "Clinical experience and current practice", "Vision assessment tools and protocols", and "Assessment barriers". It was sent out online, to 29 different hospital departments and 18 separate units for occupational therapists and physiotherapists treating patients with acquired brain injury.

Results: Most respondents worked in acute or subacute hospital settings. Few departments had an interdisciplinary vision team, and very few therapists had formal education in visual problems after acquired brain injury. Visual assessment practices varied, and there was limited use of standardized tests. Barriers to identifying visual problems included patient-related challenges, knowledge gaps, and resource limitations.

Conclusion: The study emphasized the need for enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, formal education, and standardized assessments to address visual problems after acquired brain injury. Overcoming these challenges may improve identification and management, ultimately contributing to better patient care and outcomes in the future.

后天性脑损伤后的视觉问题评估:丹麦医院现行做法调查。
目的:探讨目前医院在评估后天性脑损伤患者视力问题方面的做法:探讨目前医院在评估后天性脑损伤患者视力问题方面的做法:设计:调查研究:共有 143 名来自医院、具有职业治疗和物理治疗背景的受访者参与了调查:调查问卷由丹麦和挪威研究小组合作开发,包括22个项目,分别涉及 "背景信息"、"临床经验和当前实践"、"视力评估工具和方案 "以及 "评估障碍"。调查通过网络发送给 29 个不同的医院部门和 18 个治疗后天性脑损伤患者的职业治疗师和物理治疗师的独立单位:大多数受访者在急症或亚急性医院工作。很少有部门设有跨学科视觉团队,也很少有治疗师接受过后天性脑损伤后视觉问题方面的正规教育。视觉评估方法各不相同,标准化测试的使用也很有限。识别视觉问题的障碍包括与患者相关的挑战、知识差距和资源限制:研究强调,需要加强跨学科合作、正规教育和标准化评估,以解决后天性脑损伤后的视觉问题。克服这些挑战可能会改善识别和管理,最终有助于在未来改善患者护理和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信