Development and validation of clinical implementation methods for patient-reported outcomes in Japanese multi-center palliative care units.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nao Ito, Azusa Sato, Kana Takeuchi, Tomoko Shigeno, Hiroko Sasaki, Maho Aoyama, Mitsunori Miyashita
{"title":"Development and validation of clinical implementation methods for patient-reported outcomes in Japanese multi-center palliative care units.","authors":"Nao Ito, Azusa Sato, Kana Takeuchi, Tomoko Shigeno, Hiroko Sasaki, Maho Aoyama, Mitsunori Miyashita","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00730-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are recommended for use in clinical oncology. However, they are not routinely used in professional palliative care practices in Japan. The reasons include both patient and healthcare provider factors and the implementation of PROs. This study aimed to develop and validate clinical implementation methods for PROs in Japanese palliative care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted with four palliative care units in Japan. The study was conducted in six steps: unit assessment, development and implementation of a PRO implementation plan, PRO post-implementation survey and analysis of its utilization, a review of the PRO implementation process, creation of a PRO implementation method in a palliative care unit, and use and verification of the implementation method. Steps 1-5 were the development phase, and step 6 was the verification phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted with healthcare providers prior to PRO implementation. Intervention characteristics, patient needs in the palliative care unit, and factors related to the organization were identified as barriers. The implementation plan was developed, and the core members were selected. The implementation procedures were created in the above mentioned steps. PROs were used in the palliative care units. The same was true in the validation phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study guided PROs in specialized palliative care unit in a clinical setting. The method was developed and validated for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit. In the PRO implementation process, it was important to assess the unit, address the barriers to implementation, and reduce the burden on healthcare providers. Furthermore, healthcare providers had to be supported by the champion, a person responsible for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00730-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are recommended for use in clinical oncology. However, they are not routinely used in professional palliative care practices in Japan. The reasons include both patient and healthcare provider factors and the implementation of PROs. This study aimed to develop and validate clinical implementation methods for PROs in Japanese palliative care units.

Methods: The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted with four palliative care units in Japan. The study was conducted in six steps: unit assessment, development and implementation of a PRO implementation plan, PRO post-implementation survey and analysis of its utilization, a review of the PRO implementation process, creation of a PRO implementation method in a palliative care unit, and use and verification of the implementation method. Steps 1-5 were the development phase, and step 6 was the verification phase.

Results: Interviews were conducted with healthcare providers prior to PRO implementation. Intervention characteristics, patient needs in the palliative care unit, and factors related to the organization were identified as barriers. The implementation plan was developed, and the core members were selected. The implementation procedures were created in the above mentioned steps. PROs were used in the palliative care units. The same was true in the validation phase.

Conclusions: This study guided PROs in specialized palliative care unit in a clinical setting. The method was developed and validated for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit. In the PRO implementation process, it was important to assess the unit, address the barriers to implementation, and reduce the burden on healthcare providers. Furthermore, healthcare providers had to be supported by the champion, a person responsible for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit.

日本多中心姑息治疗病房患者报告结果的临床实施方法的开发与验证。
背景:患者报告结果(PROs)被推荐用于临床肿瘤学。然而,在日本,专业姑息治疗实践中并未常规使用这些指标。究其原因,既有患者和医疗服务提供者的因素,也有 PROs 的实施因素。本研究旨在开发和验证PROs在日本姑息治疗单位的临床实施方法:方法:在日本四家姑息治疗机构开展了实施研究综合框架(CFIR)研究。研究分六个步骤进行:单位评估、制定和实施 PRO 实施计划、PRO 实施后调查及其使用分析、PRO 实施过程回顾、在姑息治疗单位创建 PRO 实施方法,以及实施方法的使用和验证。第 1-5 步为开发阶段,第 6 步为验证阶段:结果:在实施 PRO 之前,对医疗服务提供者进行了访谈。干预特点、姑息关怀病房患者的需求以及与组织相关的因素被确定为障碍。制定了实施计划,并选定了核心成员。在上述步骤中制定了实施程序。在姑息关怀病房中使用了PROs。在验证阶段也是如此:本研究在临床环境中指导了专业姑息关怀病房的PROs。该方法是为在姑息关怀病房实施PRO而开发和验证的。在PRO的实施过程中,重要的是要对科室进行评估,解决实施过程中的障碍,减轻医护人员的负担。此外,医疗服务提供者必须得到支持者的支持,即负责在姑息关怀病房实施PROs的人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信