Using Behavioral Insights to Strengthen Strategies for Change. Practical Applications for Quality Improvement in Healthcare.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001242
Rie Laurine Rosenthal Johansen, Simon Tulloch
{"title":"Using Behavioral Insights to Strengthen Strategies for Change. Practical Applications for Quality Improvement in Healthcare.","authors":"Rie Laurine Rosenthal Johansen, Simon Tulloch","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For over 30 years, quality improvement (QI) methods have been used as a means of increasing the quality and safety of healthcare services, but with mixed success. One explanation highlighted in the literature for this outcome is the overemphasis on technical elements of change, and a failure to fully appreciate the human side of change. Behavioral insights (BI) is an approach that utilizes knowledge and tools from a broad range of scientific disciplines, such as neuroscience and behavioral psychology, to support behavior change. The aim of this paper is to explore the possibility of supplementing QI methods with tools and understanding from BI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We outline a practical case that involved applying aspects BI methods into a QI program aimed at reducing the use of intravenous antibiotics in patients accessing services at a busy university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. We exemplify how to use BI tools to guide the analysis of staff behaviors during standard clinical processes and develop targeted interventions aimed at increasing actions and behaviors more aligned to best clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcomes suggest that it is possible to combine the models and methods from BI and QI in a way that is helpful in focusing attention on the human side of change when developing strategies for change. Potential psychological barriers identified from the analysis included the following: 'default inertia,' 'decision complexity,' 'risk aversion,' and biases related to confidence, confirmation, and omission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future quality improvement projects could benefit from integrating models and tools from BI to guide and support behavior change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"e78-e84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: For over 30 years, quality improvement (QI) methods have been used as a means of increasing the quality and safety of healthcare services, but with mixed success. One explanation highlighted in the literature for this outcome is the overemphasis on technical elements of change, and a failure to fully appreciate the human side of change. Behavioral insights (BI) is an approach that utilizes knowledge and tools from a broad range of scientific disciplines, such as neuroscience and behavioral psychology, to support behavior change. The aim of this paper is to explore the possibility of supplementing QI methods with tools and understanding from BI.

Methods: We outline a practical case that involved applying aspects BI methods into a QI program aimed at reducing the use of intravenous antibiotics in patients accessing services at a busy university hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark. We exemplify how to use BI tools to guide the analysis of staff behaviors during standard clinical processes and develop targeted interventions aimed at increasing actions and behaviors more aligned to best clinical practice.

Results: Outcomes suggest that it is possible to combine the models and methods from BI and QI in a way that is helpful in focusing attention on the human side of change when developing strategies for change. Potential psychological barriers identified from the analysis included the following: 'default inertia,' 'decision complexity,' 'risk aversion,' and biases related to confidence, confirmation, and omission.

Conclusions: Future quality improvement projects could benefit from integrating models and tools from BI to guide and support behavior change.

利用行为洞察力加强变革战略。医疗质量改进的实际应用》。
目标:30 多年来,质量改进(QI)方法一直被用作提高医疗保健服务质量和安全性的一种手段,但取得的成功有好有坏。对于这种结果,文献中强调的一种解释是,过于强调变革的技术要素,而未能充分认识到变革中人的因素。行为洞察(BI)是一种利用神经科学和行为心理学等广泛科学学科的知识和工具来支持行为改变的方法。本文旨在探讨用 BI 的工具和理解来补充质量改进方法的可能性:我们概述了一个实际案例,该案例涉及将商业智能方法应用到一项质量改进计划中,该计划旨在减少丹麦哥本哈根一家繁忙的大学医院就诊病人静脉注射抗生素的使用。我们举例说明了如何使用商业智能工具指导分析员工在标准临床流程中的行为,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以增加更符合最佳临床实践的行动和行为:结果表明,在制定变革策略时,可以将商业智能和质量改进的模型和方法结合起来,从而有助于关注变革中人的因素。分析中发现的潜在心理障碍包括以下几点:默认惰性"、"决策复杂性"、"风险规避 "以及与信心、确认和遗漏相关的偏见:未来的质量改进项目可以从整合商业智能的模型和工具来指导和支持行为改变中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信