Relationship of pain relief with catastrophizing following interventional pain procedures for low back pain.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kanishka Rajput, Benjamin A Howie, Julius Araash Danesh, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, David Yanez, Robert Chow
{"title":"Relationship of pain relief with catastrophizing following interventional pain procedures for low back pain.","authors":"Kanishka Rajput, Benjamin A Howie, Julius Araash Danesh, Xiwen Zhao, Hung-Mo Lin, David Yanez, Robert Chow","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-105247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Catastrophizing is associated with worse pain outcomes after various procedures suggesting its utility in predicting response. However, the stability of pain catastrophizing as a static predictor has been challenged. We assess, among patients undergoing steroid injections for chronic low back pain (cLBP), whether catastrophizing changes with the clinical response to pain interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients undergoing fluoroscopic-guided injections for cLBP. Patients filled out Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at baseline and 1-month follow-up. We assessed the change in PCS scores from pre-injection to post-injection and examined its predictors. We also examined the correlation of various domains of BPI, such as pain severity and effect on Relationships, Enjoyment, and Mood (REM), with PCS scores at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>128 patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) PCS and pain severity scores at baseline were 22.38 (±13.58) and 5.56 (±1.82), respectively. Follow-up PCS and pain severity scores were 19.76 (±15.25) and 4.42 (±2.38), respectively. The change in PCS pre-injection to post-injection was not significant (p=0.12). Multiple regression models revealed baseline PCS and REM domain of BPI as the most important predictors of change in PCS after injection. Pain severity, activity-related pain, age, sex, insurance status, depression, prior surgery, opioid use, or prior interventions did not predict change in PCS score. In correlation analysis, change in PCS was moderately correlated with change in pain (r=0.38), but weakly correlated with baseline pain in all pain domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCS showed non-significant improvement following steroid injections; the study was not powered for this outcome. Follow-up PCS scores were predicted by the REM domain of BPI, rather than pain severity. Larger studies are needed to evaluate a statistically significant and clinically meaningful change in catastrophizing scores following pain interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"489-494"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105247","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Catastrophizing is associated with worse pain outcomes after various procedures suggesting its utility in predicting response. However, the stability of pain catastrophizing as a static predictor has been challenged. We assess, among patients undergoing steroid injections for chronic low back pain (cLBP), whether catastrophizing changes with the clinical response to pain interventions.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients undergoing fluoroscopic-guided injections for cLBP. Patients filled out Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at baseline and 1-month follow-up. We assessed the change in PCS scores from pre-injection to post-injection and examined its predictors. We also examined the correlation of various domains of BPI, such as pain severity and effect on Relationships, Enjoyment, and Mood (REM), with PCS scores at baseline and follow-up.

Results: 128 patients were enrolled. Mean (SD) PCS and pain severity scores at baseline were 22.38 (±13.58) and 5.56 (±1.82), respectively. Follow-up PCS and pain severity scores were 19.76 (±15.25) and 4.42 (±2.38), respectively. The change in PCS pre-injection to post-injection was not significant (p=0.12). Multiple regression models revealed baseline PCS and REM domain of BPI as the most important predictors of change in PCS after injection. Pain severity, activity-related pain, age, sex, insurance status, depression, prior surgery, opioid use, or prior interventions did not predict change in PCS score. In correlation analysis, change in PCS was moderately correlated with change in pain (r=0.38), but weakly correlated with baseline pain in all pain domains.

Conclusions: PCS showed non-significant improvement following steroid injections; the study was not powered for this outcome. Follow-up PCS scores were predicted by the REM domain of BPI, rather than pain severity. Larger studies are needed to evaluate a statistically significant and clinically meaningful change in catastrophizing scores following pain interventions.

腰痛介入治疗后疼痛缓解与灾难化的关系。
简介灾难化与各种手术后较差的疼痛结果有关,这表明灾难化在预测反应方面很有用。然而,疼痛灾难化作为一种静态预测指标的稳定性受到了质疑。我们在接受类固醇注射治疗的慢性腰背痛(cLBP)患者中评估了疼痛灾难化是否会随着疼痛干预的临床反应而改变:这项前瞻性研究招募了接受透视引导注射治疗慢性腰背痛的患者。患者在基线和随访一个月时填写了简明疼痛量表(BPI)和疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)。我们评估了从注射前到注射后 PCS 评分的变化,并研究了其预测因素。我们还研究了基线和随访时 BPI 各领域(如疼痛严重程度和对关系、享受和情绪(REM)的影响)与 PCS 评分的相关性:结果:128 名患者入选。基线 PCS 和疼痛严重程度评分的平均值(标清)分别为 22.38 (±13.58) 和 5.56 (±1.82)。随访时的 PCS 和疼痛严重程度评分分别为 19.76 (±15.25) 和 4.42 (±2.38)。注射前与注射后的 PCS 变化不显著(P=0.12)。多元回归模型显示,基线 PCS 和 BPI 的 REM 领域是预测注射后 PCS 变化的最重要因素。疼痛严重程度、活动相关疼痛、年龄、性别、保险状况、抑郁、既往手术、阿片类药物使用或既往干预并不能预测 PCS 评分的变化。在相关性分析中,PCS的变化与疼痛的变化呈中度相关(r=0.38),但与所有疼痛领域的基线疼痛呈弱相关:结论:类固醇注射后,PCS无明显改善;该研究未对这一结果进行研究。随访 PCS 评分是由 BPI 的 REM 领域而非疼痛严重程度预测的。需要进行更大规模的研究,以评估疼痛干预后灾难化评分在统计学上的显著变化和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信