What do patients and families observe about pediatric safety?: A thematic analysis of real-time narratives

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Christine Studenmund MD, Audrey Lyndon PhD, RNC, James R. Stotts PhD, RN, Caroline Peralta-Neel MPS, Anjana E. Sharma MD, MAS, Naomi S. Bardach MD, MAS
{"title":"What do patients and families observe about pediatric safety?: A thematic analysis of real-time narratives","authors":"Christine Studenmund MD,&nbsp;Audrey Lyndon PhD, RNC,&nbsp;James R. Stotts PhD, RN,&nbsp;Caroline Peralta-Neel MPS,&nbsp;Anjana E. Sharma MD, MAS,&nbsp;Naomi S. Bardach MD, MAS","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Data on inpatient safety are documented by hospital staff through incident reporting (IR) systems. Safety observations from families or patients are rarely captured. The Family Input for Quality and Safety (FIQS) study created a mobile health tool for pediatric patients and their families to anonymously report safety observations in real time during hospitalization. The study objectives were to describe these observations and identify domains salient to safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this observational study, we analyzed pediatric patient safety reports from June 2017 to April 2018. Participants were: English-speaking family members and hospitalized patients ≥13 years old. The analysis had two stages: (1) assessment of whether narratives met established safety event criteria and whether there were companion IRs; (2) thematic analysis to identify domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 248 enrolled participants, 58 submitted 120 narrative reports. Of the narratives, 68 (57%) met safety event criteria, while only 1 (0.8%) corresponded to a staff-reported IR. Twenty-five percent of narratives shared positive feedback about patient safety efforts; 75% shared constructive feedback. We identified domains particularly salient to safety: (1) patients and families as safety actors; (2) emotional safety; (3) system-centered care; and (4) shared safety domains, including medication, communication, and environment of care. Some domains capture data that is otherwise difficult to obtain (#1–3), while others fit within standard healthcare safety domains (#4).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients and families observe and report salient safety events that can fill gaps in IR data. Healthcare leaders should consider incorporating patient and family observations—collected with an option for anonymity and eliciting both positive and constructive comments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Data on inpatient safety are documented by hospital staff through incident reporting (IR) systems. Safety observations from families or patients are rarely captured. The Family Input for Quality and Safety (FIQS) study created a mobile health tool for pediatric patients and their families to anonymously report safety observations in real time during hospitalization. The study objectives were to describe these observations and identify domains salient to safety.

Methods

In this observational study, we analyzed pediatric patient safety reports from June 2017 to April 2018. Participants were: English-speaking family members and hospitalized patients ≥13 years old. The analysis had two stages: (1) assessment of whether narratives met established safety event criteria and whether there were companion IRs; (2) thematic analysis to identify domains.

Results

Of 248 enrolled participants, 58 submitted 120 narrative reports. Of the narratives, 68 (57%) met safety event criteria, while only 1 (0.8%) corresponded to a staff-reported IR. Twenty-five percent of narratives shared positive feedback about patient safety efforts; 75% shared constructive feedback. We identified domains particularly salient to safety: (1) patients and families as safety actors; (2) emotional safety; (3) system-centered care; and (4) shared safety domains, including medication, communication, and environment of care. Some domains capture data that is otherwise difficult to obtain (#1–3), while others fit within standard healthcare safety domains (#4).

Conclusions

Patients and families observe and report salient safety events that can fill gaps in IR data. Healthcare leaders should consider incorporating patient and family observations—collected with an option for anonymity and eliciting both positive and constructive comments.

Abstract Image

患者和家属如何看待儿科安全?对实时叙述的专题分析。
目标:医院员工通过事故报告(IR)系统记录住院病人的安全数据。来自家属或患者的安全意见却很少被记录下来。质量与安全家庭输入(FIQS)研究为儿科患者及其家属创建了一个移动健康工具,用于在住院期间匿名实时报告安全观察结果。研究目标是描述这些观察结果,并确定与安全有关的突出领域:在这项观察性研究中,我们分析了 2017 年 6 月至 2018 年 4 月的儿科患者安全报告。参与者包括讲英语的家庭成员和年龄≥13 岁的住院患者。分析分为两个阶段:1)评估叙述是否符合既定的安全事件标准,是否有配套的IR;2)进行主题分析以确定领域:在 248 名注册参与者中,58 人提交了 120 份叙述报告。在这些叙述中,68 份(57%)符合安全事件标准,只有一份(0.8%)与工作人员报告的 IR 相符。25% 的叙述报告分享了有关患者安全工作的积极反馈;75% 分享了建设性反馈。我们确定了对安全尤为重要的领域:1)作为安全参与者的患者和家属;2)情感安全;3)以系统为中心的护理;4)共享安全领域,包括用药、沟通和护理环境。有些领域捕捉到了难以获得的数据(#1-3),而其他领域则符合标准的医疗安全领域(#4):患者和家属观察并报告突出的安全事件,可以填补 IR 数据的空白。医疗保健领导者应考虑纳入患者和家属的观察结果--收集时可选择匿名,并同时征求积极和建设性的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信