The Caregiver Burden of Helmet Therapy following Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tega Ebeye, Ayeh Hussain, Erin Brennan, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Christopher R Forrest, Johanna N Riesel
{"title":"The Caregiver Burden of Helmet Therapy following Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study.","authors":"Tega Ebeye, Ayeh Hussain, Erin Brennan, Abhaya V Kulkarni, Christopher R Forrest, Johanna N Riesel","doi":"10.1159/000539299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This cohort study aimed to elucidate the caregiver burden of helmet therapy (HT), following endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) to treat craniosynostosis, in an effort to inform clinicians and future caregivers navigating this therapeutic option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen caregivers of children with positional plagiocephaly (6) and craniosynostosis treated by ESC (8) undergoing HT at a single center were recruited via convenience sampling. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the experience of HT for caregivers. Data collection and analysis were iterative and conducted until thematic saturation was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emerging themes revealed five domains of caregiver burden: emotional, cognitive, physical, psychosocial, and financial. No caregiver felt the therapy was too burdensome to complete. Caregivers of both groups also expressed positive aspects of HT related to support from the team, the noninvasive nature of treatment, and the outcomes of therapy. Furthermore, caregivers report overall satisfaction with the process, stating willingness to repeat the treatment with subsequent children if required.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HT is associated with five major domains of caregiver burden; however, none of the caregivers regret choosing this treatment option, nor was the burden high enough to encourage treatment cessation. This study will inform future prospective analyses that will quantify real-time caregiver burden throughout HT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This cohort study aimed to elucidate the caregiver burden of helmet therapy (HT), following endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) to treat craniosynostosis, in an effort to inform clinicians and future caregivers navigating this therapeutic option.

Methods: Fourteen caregivers of children with positional plagiocephaly (6) and craniosynostosis treated by ESC (8) undergoing HT at a single center were recruited via convenience sampling. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the experience of HT for caregivers. Data collection and analysis were iterative and conducted until thematic saturation was reached.

Results: Emerging themes revealed five domains of caregiver burden: emotional, cognitive, physical, psychosocial, and financial. No caregiver felt the therapy was too burdensome to complete. Caregivers of both groups also expressed positive aspects of HT related to support from the team, the noninvasive nature of treatment, and the outcomes of therapy. Furthermore, caregivers report overall satisfaction with the process, stating willingness to repeat the treatment with subsequent children if required.

Conclusion: HT is associated with five major domains of caregiver burden; however, none of the caregivers regret choosing this treatment option, nor was the burden high enough to encourage treatment cessation. This study will inform future prospective analyses that will quantify real-time caregiver burden throughout HT.

内窥镜带状颅骨切除术后头盔疗法的护理负担:现象学定性研究。
简介:这项队列研究旨在阐明内窥镜带状颅骨切除术(ESC)治疗颅骨发育不良后头盔疗法(HT)给护理人员带来的负担,从而为临床医生和未来的护理人员提供指导:方法: 通过便利抽样的方式,招募了 14 名在一个中心接受 HT 治疗的位置性发育不良(6 名)和颅骨发育不良(8 名)患儿的护理人员。采用现象学定性方法,进行了半结构化访谈,以了解护理人员的 HT 体验。数据收集和分析是反复进行的,直到达到主题饱和为止:新出现的主题揭示了照顾者负担的五个领域:情感、认知、身体、社会心理和经济。没有照顾者认为完成治疗负担过重。两组护理人员还对 HT 的积极方面进行了表述,包括团队的支持、治疗的非侵入性以及治疗效果。此外,照护者对治疗过程总体表示满意,并表示如果需要,愿意为以后的孩子重复治疗:高温热疗与护理人员的五大负担相关;但是,没有任何护理人员对选择这种治疗方案感到后悔,也没有任何护理人员因负担过重而放弃治疗。这项研究将为未来的前瞻性分析提供信息,这些分析将量化整个 HT 治疗过程中护理人员的实时负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Neurosurgery
Pediatric Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in ''Pediatric Neurosurgery'' strives to publish new information and observations in pediatric neurosurgery and the allied fields of neurology, neuroradiology and neuropathology as they relate to the etiology of neurologic diseases and the operative care of affected patients. In addition to experimental and clinical studies, the journal presents critical reviews which provide the reader with an update on selected topics as well as case histories and reports on advances in methodology and technique. This thought-provoking focus encourages dissemination of information from neurosurgeons and neuroscientists around the world that will be of interest to clinicians and researchers concerned with pediatric, congenital, and developmental diseases of the nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信