Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior "Superior Mesenteric Artery-First" Approach.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Baiqiang An, Qing Yue, Shupeng Wang, Wei Han
{"title":"Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined With Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection and Reconstruction: Inferior-Posterior \"Superior Mesenteric Artery-First\" Approach.","authors":"Baiqiang An, Qing Yue, Shupeng Wang, Wei Han","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior \"superior mesenteric artery-first\" approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P =0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P =0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P =0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P =0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P =0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P =0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P =0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P =0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P =0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P =0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior \"superior mesenteric artery-first\" approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure's long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"306-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection and reconstruction is increasingly performed. We aimed to introduce a safe and effective surgical approach and share our clinical experience with LPD with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction.

Methods: We reviewed data for the patients undergoing LPD and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction at the First Hospital of Jilin University between April 2021 and May 2023. The inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach was used. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the 2 groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection.

Results: A cohort of 37 patients with periampullary and pancreatic tumors underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction, consisting of 21 LPDs and 16 OPDs. The LPD group had a longer operation time (322 vs. 235 min, P =0.039), reduced intraoperative bleeding (152 vs. 325 mL, P =0.026), and lower intraoperative blood transfusion rates (19.0% vs. 50.0%, P =0.046) compared with the OPD group. The LPD group had significantly shorter operation times in end-to-end anastomosis (26 vs. 15 min, P =0.001) and artificial grafts vascular reconstruction (44 vs. 22 min, P =0.000) compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in the rate of R0 resection (100% vs. 87.5%, P =0.096). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (15 vs. 18 d, P =0.636 and 2.5 vs. 4.5 d, P =0.726, respectively). However, the postoperative hospital stay in the LPD group was notably shorter compared with the OPD group (11 vs. 16 d, P =0.007). Postoperative complication rates, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) Grade A/B, biliary leakage, and delayed gastric emptying (DGE), were similar between the two groups (38.1% vs. 43.8%, P =0.729). In addition, 1 patient in each group developed thrombosis, with vascular patency improving after anticoagulation treatment.

Conclusion: LPD combined with PV/SMV resection and reconstruction can be easily and safely performed using the inferior-posterior "superior mesenteric artery-first" approach in cases of venous invasion. Further studies are required to evaluate the procedure's long-term outcomes.

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术联合门-肠系膜上静脉切除与重建:腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术联合门-肠系膜上静脉切除与重建:下-上 "肠系膜上动脉先行 "入路。
背景:腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)合并门-肠系膜上静脉(PV/SMV)切除和重建的手术越来越多。我们旨在介绍一种安全有效的手术方法,并分享我们在胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)同时进行门-肠系膜上静脉(PV/SMV)切除和重建的临床经验:我们回顾了 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在吉林大学第一医院接受 LPD 和开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)联合 PV/SMV 切除和重建术的患者数据。手术采用下-后 "肠系膜上动脉先入 "方式。我们比较了两组患者的术前、术中和术后临床病理数据,对LPD合并大血管切除术进行了综合评估:结果:37例胰腺周围肿瘤和胰腺肿瘤患者接受了胰十二指肠切除术(PD),并进行了主要血管切除和重建,其中包括21例LPD患者和16例OPD患者。与 OPD 组相比,LPD 组手术时间更长(322 分钟对 235 分钟,P=0.039),术中出血量更少(152 毫升对 325 毫升,P=0.026),术中输血率更低(19.0% 对 50.0%,P=0.046)。与 OPD 组相比,LPD 组在端端吻合(26 分钟对 15 分钟,P=0.001)和人工移植物血管重建(44 分钟对 22 分钟,P=0.000)方面的手术时间明显更短。R0切除率无明显差异(100% vs. 87.5%,P=0.096)。两组患者的住院时间和重症监护室住院时间无明显差异(分别为 15 天对 18 天,P=0.636;2.5 天对 4.5 天,P=0.726)。然而,LPD组的术后住院时间明显短于OPD组(11天 vs. 16天,P=0.007)。两组的术后并发症发生率相似,包括术后胰瘘(POPF)A/B级、胆漏和胃排空延迟(DGE)(38.1% vs. 43.8%,P=0.729)。此外,两组各有一名患者出现血栓形成,抗凝治疗后血管通畅性有所改善:结论:在静脉侵犯的病例中,使用下-后 "肠系膜上动脉先入 "方法可轻松安全地进行LPD联合PV/SMV切除和重建术。需要进一步研究以评估该手术的长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信