Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Defining minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state and substantial clinical benefit for the visual analog scale pain score after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 ​± ​10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P ​&lt; ​0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>II.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 592-597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000907/pdfft?md5=b8ae8aece9c4a27ac70c3c91db45b0e6&pid=1-s2.0-S2059775424000907-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) is commonly assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and there is an increased need to establish clinical relevance within these measures. The purpose of this study was to (1) define minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) for the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR, and (2) identify preoperative predictors of achieving each of these threshold values.

Methods

Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study between 2010 and 2016 were prospectively collected. Baseline data and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. MCID, PASS and SCB were determined using an anchor-based approach, with anchor questions assessing postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfillment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was also used to identify preoperative predictors for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB.

Results

A total of 286 patients were included in the final analysis, with an average age of 60.2 ​± ​10.4 and the majority being female (61.2%). The values for the VAS pain score identified to represent MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year postoperatively were: 5, 2, and 1. The rates of achieving clinically significant improvement based on VAS were 60.5%, 63.3%, and 57.2%, respectively. A higher preoperative VAS was predictive for achieving MCID (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; P ​< ​0.01).

Conclusion

This study identified threshold VAS pain scores of 5, 2, and 1 for achieving MCID, PASS, and SCB, respectively, at 1-year follow-up after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A higher preoperative VAS pain score was also identified as a statistically significant predictor of attaining MCID after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Level of Evidence

II.

定义关节镜下肩袖修复术后视觉模拟量表疼痛评分的最小临床意义差异、患者可接受症状状态和实质性临床获益。
导言:关节镜下肩袖修复术(RCR)后的患者满意度通常由患者报告的结果指标(PROMs)进行评估,因此越来越需要在这些指标中确定临床相关性。本研究的目的是:(1) 界定接受关节镜 RCR 患者视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 疼痛评分的最小临床意义差异 (MCID)、患者可接受症状状态 (PASS) 和实质性临床获益 (SCB);(2) 确定达到这些阈值的术前预测因素:前瞻性地收集了2010年至2016年间接受关节镜下肩袖修复术初治的连续患者的数据。术前、术后 1 年和 2 年收集基线数据和 VAS 疼痛评分。采用基于锚点的方法确定 MCID、PASS 和 SCB,其中锚点问题评估术后满意度和期望实现情况。此外,还使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定达到 MCID、PASS 和 SCB 的术前预测因素:共有 286 名患者被纳入最终分析,平均年龄为(60.2 ± 10.4)岁,大多数为女性(61.2%)。术后 1 年的 VAS 疼痛评分值分别代表 MCID、PASS 和 SCB,分别为 5、2 和 1:根据 VAS,临床显著改善率分别为 60.5%、63.3% 和 57.2%。术前 VAS 值越高,获得 MCID 的几率越大(几率比 [OR],1.84;PConclusion):本研究确定了在关节镜下肩袖修复术后 1 年随访时,VAS 疼痛评分达到 5、2 和 1 分分别是达到 MCID、PASS 和 SCB 的阈值。术前VAS疼痛评分越高,对关节镜下肩袖修复术后达到MCID的预测越有统计学意义:证据等级:II。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信