The feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of screening for frailty in Australians aged 75 years and over attending Australian general practice.

Jennifer Job, Caroline Nicholson, Debra Clark, Julia Arapova, Claire Jackson
{"title":"The feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of screening for frailty in Australians aged 75 years and over attending Australian general practice.","authors":"Jennifer Job, Caroline Nicholson, Debra Clark, Julia Arapova, Claire Jackson","doi":"10.1071/PY23173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Globally, frailty is associated with a high prevalence of avoidable hospital admissions and emergency department visits, with substantial associated healthcare and personal costs. International guidelines recommend incorporation of frailty identification and care planning into routine primary care workflow to support patients who may be identified as pre-frail/frail. Our study aimed to: (1) determine the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing a validated FRAIL Scale screening Tool into general practices in two disparate Australian regions (Sydney North and Brisbane South); and (2) map the resources and referral options required to support frailty management and potential reversal. Methods Using the FRAIL Scale Tool, practices screened eligible patients (aged ≥75years) for risk of frailty and referred to associated management options. The percentage of patients identified as frail/pre-frail, and management options and referrals made by practice staff for those identified as frail/pre-frail were recorded. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with practice staff to understand the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing the Tool. Results The Tool was implemented by 19 general practices in two Primary Health Networks and 1071 consenting patients were assessed. Overall, 80% of patients (n =860) met the criterion for frailty: 33% of patients (n =352) were frail, and 47% were pre-frail (n =508). They were predominantly then referred for exercise prescription, medication reviews and geriatric assessment. The Tool was acceptable to staff and patients and compatible with practice workflows. Conclusions This study demonstrates that frailty is identified frequently in Australians aged ≥75years who visit their general practice. It's identification, linked with management support to reverse or reduce frailty risk, can be readily incorporated into the Medicare-funded annual 75+ Health Assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Globally, frailty is associated with a high prevalence of avoidable hospital admissions and emergency department visits, with substantial associated healthcare and personal costs. International guidelines recommend incorporation of frailty identification and care planning into routine primary care workflow to support patients who may be identified as pre-frail/frail. Our study aimed to: (1) determine the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing a validated FRAIL Scale screening Tool into general practices in two disparate Australian regions (Sydney North and Brisbane South); and (2) map the resources and referral options required to support frailty management and potential reversal. Methods Using the FRAIL Scale Tool, practices screened eligible patients (aged ≥75years) for risk of frailty and referred to associated management options. The percentage of patients identified as frail/pre-frail, and management options and referrals made by practice staff for those identified as frail/pre-frail were recorded. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with practice staff to understand the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and determinants of implementing the Tool. Results The Tool was implemented by 19 general practices in two Primary Health Networks and 1071 consenting patients were assessed. Overall, 80% of patients (n =860) met the criterion for frailty: 33% of patients (n =352) were frail, and 47% were pre-frail (n =508). They were predominantly then referred for exercise prescription, medication reviews and geriatric assessment. The Tool was acceptable to staff and patients and compatible with practice workflows. Conclusions This study demonstrates that frailty is identified frequently in Australians aged ≥75years who visit their general practice. It's identification, linked with management support to reverse or reduce frailty risk, can be readily incorporated into the Medicare-funded annual 75+ Health Assessment.

在澳大利亚全科诊所就诊的 75 岁及以上澳大利亚人中进行虚弱筛查的可行性、可接受性和适当性。
背景 在全球范围内,体弱与可避免的入院和急诊就诊的高发率有关,并产生大量相关的医疗保健和个人费用。国际指南建议将体弱识别和护理规划纳入常规初级保健工作流程,为可能被识别为前期体弱/体弱的患者提供支持。我们的研究旨在(1)确定在澳大利亚两个不同地区(悉尼北区和布里斯班南区)的全科诊所实施经验证的 FRAIL 量表筛查工具的可行性、可接受性、适宜性和决定因素;以及(2)绘制支持虚弱管理和潜在逆转所需的资源和转诊选择图。方法 使用 FRAIL 量表工具,医疗机构对符合条件的患者(年龄≥75 岁)进行虚弱风险筛查,并推荐相关的管理方案。记录被确定为体弱/前期体弱的患者比例,以及医务人员对被确定为体弱/前期体弱的患者采取的管理方案和转诊情况。对医务人员进行了半结构化定性访谈,以了解实施该工具的可行性、可接受性、适宜性和决定因素。结果 两个初级健康网络中的 19 家综合诊所实施了该工具,并对 1071 名同意的患者进行了评估。总体而言,80% 的患者(n =860)符合体弱标准:33% 的患者(n =352)体弱,47% 的患者(n =508)体弱前期。随后,他们主要被转介接受运动处方、药物复查和老年病评估。工作人员和患者都能接受该工具,而且该工具与实践工作流程兼容。结论 本研究表明,在澳大利亚,年龄≥75 岁的老年人在普通诊所就诊时经常会被发现体弱。体弱的识别与管理支持相结合,以扭转或降低体弱风险,可随时纳入医疗保险资助的年度 75 岁以上健康评估中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信