Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260
Hacer Oncu, Ebru Calik-Kutukcu, Naciye Vardar Yagli, Deniz Inal-Ince, Melda Saglam, Ferhat Unal, Sercan Aksoy
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.","authors":"Hacer Oncu, Ebru Calik-Kutukcu, Naciye Vardar Yagli, Deniz Inal-Ince, Melda Saglam, Ferhat Unal, Sercan Aksoy","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic pain, sensory disturbances, and lymphedema are frequent after breast cancer, leading to arm dysfunction. There is a need for objective performance-based clinical exercise tests for the upper extremity in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in breast cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight women with breast cancer (mean age = 55.40 ± 10.40 years) were included. All patients performed 6PBRT on the first day and one week later to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. The peak workload (W<sub>peak</sub>) and oxygen consumption level (VO<sub>2peak</sub>) during the arm ergometer test were used as outcomes for the criterion validity of the 6PBRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 6PBRT showed good test - retest reliability with an ICC<sub>1,2</sub> value of 0.871 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.769-0.928]. The first 6PBRT score was very strongly correlated with the second test score (<i>r</i> = 0.866, <i>p</i> < .001). The 6PBRT score was significantly correlated with VO<sub>2peak</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.634, <i>p</i> < .001), and W<sub>peak</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.546, <i>p</i> < .001). While the 6PBRT score had less effect on VO<sub>2peak</sub>, the determination of VO<sub>2peak</sub> in the model was very good (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.832).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 6PBRT has good test-retest reliability and is a valid test in individuals with breast cancer. These findings suggest that 6PBRT is a practical, useful, valid and reliable assessment tool for determining functional arm exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"643-655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2353260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain, sensory disturbances, and lymphedema are frequent after breast cancer, leading to arm dysfunction. There is a need for objective performance-based clinical exercise tests for the upper extremity in patients with breast cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test (6PBRT) in breast cancer survivors.

Methods: Forty-eight women with breast cancer (mean age = 55.40 ± 10.40 years) were included. All patients performed 6PBRT on the first day and one week later to investigate the test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated. The peak workload (Wpeak) and oxygen consumption level (VO2peak) during the arm ergometer test were used as outcomes for the criterion validity of the 6PBRT.

Results: The 6PBRT showed good test - retest reliability with an ICC1,2 value of 0.871 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.769-0.928]. The first 6PBRT score was very strongly correlated with the second test score (r = 0.866, p < .001). The 6PBRT score was significantly correlated with VO2peak (r = 0.634, p < .001), and Wpeak (r = 0.546, p < .001). While the 6PBRT score had less effect on VO2peak, the determination of VO2peak in the model was very good (R2 = 0.832).

Conclusion: The 6PBRT has good test-retest reliability and is a valid test in individuals with breast cancer. These findings suggest that 6PBRT is a practical, useful, valid and reliable assessment tool for determining functional arm exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.

乳腺癌患者功能锻炼能力 6 分钟钉板和环形测试的可靠性和有效性。
背景:乳腺癌术后经常出现慢性疼痛、感觉障碍和淋巴水肿,导致手臂功能障碍。因此需要对乳腺癌患者的上肢进行基于客观表现的临床运动测试:本研究旨在评估乳腺癌幸存者进行 6 分钟钉板和套环测试(6PBRT)的有效性和可靠性:研究纳入了 48 名乳腺癌女性患者(平均年龄为 55.40 ± 10.40 岁)。所有患者均在第一天和一周后进行了 6PBRT 测试,以研究 6PBRT 的重测可靠性,并计算类内相关系数(ICC)。手臂测力计测试期间的峰值工作量(Wpeak)和耗氧量水平(VO2peak)作为 6PBRT 的标准效度结果:结果:6PBRT显示出良好的测试-重测可靠性,ICC1,2值为0.871[95%置信区间(CI)0.769-0.928]。第一次 6PBRT 评分与第二次测试评分的相关性非常强(r = 0.866,p 2peak)(r = 0.634,p peak)(r = 0.546,p 2peak),模型中 VO2peak 的确定性非常好(R2 = 0.832):结论:6PBRT 具有良好的重复测试可靠性,对乳腺癌患者来说是一项有效的测试。这些研究结果表明,6PBRT 是一种实用、有用、有效且可靠的评估工具,可用于确定乳腺癌患者的手臂功能锻炼能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信