Self-Management Support Improves Diabetes Outcomes Without Exacerbating Inequities.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Devika Krishnakumar, Danielle Hessler Jones, Michael B Potter
{"title":"Self-Management Support Improves Diabetes Outcomes Without Exacerbating Inequities.","authors":"Devika Krishnakumar, Danielle Hessler Jones, Michael B Potter","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230324R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous research has found an association between low health literacy and poor clinical outcomes in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. We sought to determine if this association can be mitigated by a self-management support (SMS) program provided by trained health workers using a technology assisted menu driven program, called Connection to Health (CTH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis from a randomized trial of 2 similar versions of CTH implemented in 12 Northern California community health centers. As part of this, each participant completed a single validated question to assess health literacy. We used unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses to determine the extent to which baseline health literacy was predictive of prepost changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 365 participants for whom prepost HbA1c data were available, HbA1c concentrations declined by an average of 0.76% (from 9.9% to 9.2%, 95% CI (0.53%-1.0%). Almost 114 (31.2%) of the participants had low health literacy, but there was no significant association between health literacy and the reduction in HbA1c concentrations in either the unadjusted or adjusted models, nor did baseline health literacy predict prepost changes in body mass index, medication adherence, exercise, or diet.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study found that implementing the CTH program in 2 versions via a randomized clinical trial improved HbA1c concentrations without increasing disparities between participants with high and low health literacy. This suggests CTH-like programs can enhance diabetes outcomes in community health centers without exacerbating inequities for those with low health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 2","pages":"303-308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230324R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has found an association between low health literacy and poor clinical outcomes in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients. We sought to determine if this association can be mitigated by a self-management support (SMS) program provided by trained health workers using a technology assisted menu driven program, called Connection to Health (CTH).

Methods: This study is a secondary analysis from a randomized trial of 2 similar versions of CTH implemented in 12 Northern California community health centers. As part of this, each participant completed a single validated question to assess health literacy. We used unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses to determine the extent to which baseline health literacy was predictive of prepost changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

Results: Of 365 participants for whom prepost HbA1c data were available, HbA1c concentrations declined by an average of 0.76% (from 9.9% to 9.2%, 95% CI (0.53%-1.0%). Almost 114 (31.2%) of the participants had low health literacy, but there was no significant association between health literacy and the reduction in HbA1c concentrations in either the unadjusted or adjusted models, nor did baseline health literacy predict prepost changes in body mass index, medication adherence, exercise, or diet.

Discussion: The study found that implementing the CTH program in 2 versions via a randomized clinical trial improved HbA1c concentrations without increasing disparities between participants with high and low health literacy. This suggests CTH-like programs can enhance diabetes outcomes in community health centers without exacerbating inequities for those with low health literacy.

自我管理支持可改善糖尿病治疗效果,同时不会加剧不平等。
简介先前的研究发现,2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的健康素养低与临床疗效差之间存在关联。我们试图确定,由训练有素的医务工作者通过技术辅助菜单驱动的自我管理支持(SMS)计划(名为 "健康连接"(CTH))能否缓解这种关联:本研究是对北加州 12 个社区卫生中心实施的两个类似版本的 CTH 随机试验的二次分析。作为其中的一部分,每位参与者都填写了一个评估健康素养的验证问题。我们使用未经调整和调整的线性回归分析来确定基线健康素养在多大程度上可以预测预后血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)的变化:在有 HbA1c 预测数据的 365 名参与者中,HbA1c 浓度平均下降了 0.76%(从 9.9% 降至 9.2%,95% CI (0.53%-1.0%))。近 114 名参与者(31.2%)的健康素养较低,但无论是在未调整模型还是调整模型中,健康素养与 HbA1c 浓度的降低之间都没有显著的关联,基线健康素养也不能预测体重指数、服药依从性、运动或饮食方面的前期变化:讨论:研究发现,通过随机临床试验实施两个版本的 CTH 计划可改善 HbA1c 浓度,同时不会增加高健康素养和低健康素养参与者之间的差异。这表明,类似于CTH的项目可以提高社区卫生中心的糖尿病治疗效果,同时不会加剧健康素养较低人群的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信