A framework for human–robot collaboration enhanced by preference learning and ergonomics

IF 9.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Matteo Meregalli Falerni , Vincenzo Pomponi , Hamid Reza Karimi , Matteo Lavit Nicora , Le Anh Dao , Matteo Malosio , Loris Roveda
{"title":"A framework for human–robot collaboration enhanced by preference learning and ergonomics","authors":"Matteo Meregalli Falerni ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Pomponi ,&nbsp;Hamid Reza Karimi ,&nbsp;Matteo Lavit Nicora ,&nbsp;Le Anh Dao ,&nbsp;Matteo Malosio ,&nbsp;Loris Roveda","doi":"10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Industry 5.0 aims to prioritize human operators, focusing on their well-being and capabilities, while promoting collaboration between humans and robots to enhance efficiency and productivity. The integration of collaborative robots must ensure the health and well-being of human operators. Indeed, this paper addresses the need for a human-centered framework proposing a preference-based optimization algorithm in a human–robot collaboration (HRC) scenario with an ergonomics assessment to improve working conditions. The HRC application consists of optimizing a collaborative robot end-effector pose during an object-handling task. The following approach (AmPL-RULA) utilizes an Active multi-Preference Learning (AmPL) algorithm, a preference-based optimization method, where the user is requested to iteratively provide qualitative feedback by expressing pairwise preferences between a couple of candidates. To address physical well-being, an ergonomic performance index, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), is combined with the user’s pairwise preferences, so that the optimal setting can be computed. Experimental tests have been conducted to validate the method, involving collaborative assembly during the object handling performed by the robot. Results illustrate that the proposed method can improve the physical workload of the operator while easing the collaborative task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21452,"journal":{"name":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 102781"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073658452400067X/pdfft?md5=152a05052b7af5056dcd89c29e77e26f&pid=1-s2.0-S073658452400067X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073658452400067X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industry 5.0 aims to prioritize human operators, focusing on their well-being and capabilities, while promoting collaboration between humans and robots to enhance efficiency and productivity. The integration of collaborative robots must ensure the health and well-being of human operators. Indeed, this paper addresses the need for a human-centered framework proposing a preference-based optimization algorithm in a human–robot collaboration (HRC) scenario with an ergonomics assessment to improve working conditions. The HRC application consists of optimizing a collaborative robot end-effector pose during an object-handling task. The following approach (AmPL-RULA) utilizes an Active multi-Preference Learning (AmPL) algorithm, a preference-based optimization method, where the user is requested to iteratively provide qualitative feedback by expressing pairwise preferences between a couple of candidates. To address physical well-being, an ergonomic performance index, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), is combined with the user’s pairwise preferences, so that the optimal setting can be computed. Experimental tests have been conducted to validate the method, involving collaborative assembly during the object handling performed by the robot. Results illustrate that the proposed method can improve the physical workload of the operator while easing the collaborative task.

通过偏好学习和人体工程学加强人机协作的框架
工业 5.0 的目标是优先考虑人类操作员,关注他们的福祉和能力,同时促进人类与机器人之间的协作,以提高效率和生产力。协作机器人的集成必须确保人类操作员的健康和福祉。事实上,本文针对以人为本的框架需求,在人机协作(HRC)场景中提出了一种基于偏好的优化算法,并进行了人体工程学评估,以改善工作条件。人机协作应用包括在物体搬运任务中优化协作机器人末端执行器的姿势。以下方法(AmPL-RULA)采用了主动多偏好学习(AmPL)算法,这是一种基于偏好的优化方法,要求用户在几个候选方案之间表达成对偏好,从而反复提供定性反馈。为解决身体健康问题,将人体工学性能指标--快速上肢评估(RULA)与用户的成对偏好相结合,从而计算出最佳设置。为了验证该方法,我们进行了实验测试,涉及机器人在搬运物体过程中的协作装配。结果表明,所提出的方法可以减轻操作员的体力工作量,同时减轻协作任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing
Robotics and Computer-integrated Manufacturing 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, focuses on sharing research applications that contribute to the development of new or enhanced robotics, manufacturing technologies, and innovative manufacturing strategies that are relevant to industry. Papers that combine theory and experimental validation are preferred, while review papers on current robotics and manufacturing issues are also considered. However, papers on traditional machining processes, modeling and simulation, supply chain management, and resource optimization are generally not within the scope of the journal, as there are more appropriate journals for these topics. Similarly, papers that are overly theoretical or mathematical will be directed to other suitable journals. The journal welcomes original papers in areas such as industrial robotics, human-robot collaboration in manufacturing, cloud-based manufacturing, cyber-physical production systems, big data analytics in manufacturing, smart mechatronics, machine learning, adaptive and sustainable manufacturing, and other fields involving unique manufacturing technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信