Clinical analysis of transverse process fractures: A comprehensive study on patient characteristics, management, and outcomes in trauma care.

Göksal Günerhan, Afşin Emre Akpınar, Emin Çağıl
{"title":"Clinical analysis of transverse process fractures: A comprehensive study on patient characteristics, management, and outcomes in trauma care.","authors":"Göksal Günerhan, Afşin Emre Akpınar, Emin Çağıl","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.91387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transverse process fractures (TPFs) are commonly encountered in trauma patients and are often associated with polytrauma. While traditionally considered stable injuries, recent research suggests their significance in spinal trauma may be under-estimated. This study aims to provide insights into the management and outcomes of TPFs, evaluating their predictive potential for identifying clinically significant spinal fractures and associated injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of trauma registry data from a Level I trauma center was conducted, encompassing patients with TPFs from September 2022 to September 2023. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged 18 or older with confirmed TPFs via com-puted tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), managed nonoperatively. Data on demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, pain management, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Pain severity and functionality were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 patients, predominantly male (129 patients, 67.9%), with a mean age of 45.7 years, were included in the study. Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) were the leading cause of admission (44.7%). Thoracic injuries were the most common associ-ated pathology. Of the study cohort, 88 patients (46.3%) presented with single-level TPFs, while 102 patients (53.7%) had multilevel fractures. Analysis revealed distinct differences between these groups, with multilevel TPF patients exhibiting a higher frequency of associated injuries and a notable proportion requiring hospitalization or surgical intervention. Multilevel TPF patients exhibited higher initial pain and disability scores compared to single-level TPF patients. Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores at the 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPFs, previously considered minor injuries, demonstrate significant pain and functional limitations. They often accompany systemic pathologies, particularly in multilevel fractures, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to management. The \"Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation\" (PRICE) approach, including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants, along with collar or brace support when necessary, proves effective in pain management and functional improvement. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing TPFs as complex injuries requiring tailored management strategies. Further research and collaboration among healthcare providers are warranted to refine treatment approaches and optimize outcomes for patients with TPFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11154072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.91387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transverse process fractures (TPFs) are commonly encountered in trauma patients and are often associated with polytrauma. While traditionally considered stable injuries, recent research suggests their significance in spinal trauma may be under-estimated. This study aims to provide insights into the management and outcomes of TPFs, evaluating their predictive potential for identifying clinically significant spinal fractures and associated injuries.

Methods: A retrospective review of trauma registry data from a Level I trauma center was conducted, encompassing patients with TPFs from September 2022 to September 2023. Inclusion criteria involved patients aged 18 or older with confirmed TPFs via com-puted tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), managed nonoperatively. Data on demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, pain management, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Pain severity and functionality were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

Results: A total of 190 patients, predominantly male (129 patients, 67.9%), with a mean age of 45.7 years, were included in the study. Motor vehicle accidents (MVA) were the leading cause of admission (44.7%). Thoracic injuries were the most common associ-ated pathology. Of the study cohort, 88 patients (46.3%) presented with single-level TPFs, while 102 patients (53.7%) had multilevel fractures. Analysis revealed distinct differences between these groups, with multilevel TPF patients exhibiting a higher frequency of associated injuries and a notable proportion requiring hospitalization or surgical intervention. Multilevel TPF patients exhibited higher initial pain and disability scores compared to single-level TPF patients. Both groups showed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores at the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion: TPFs, previously considered minor injuries, demonstrate significant pain and functional limitations. They often accompany systemic pathologies, particularly in multilevel fractures, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to management. The "Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation" (PRICE) approach, including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants, along with collar or brace support when necessary, proves effective in pain management and functional improvement. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing TPFs as complex injuries requiring tailored management strategies. Further research and collaboration among healthcare providers are warranted to refine treatment approaches and optimize outcomes for patients with TPFs.

横突骨折的临床分析:关于创伤护理中患者特征、管理和结果的综合研究。
背景:横突骨折(TPFs)在创伤患者中很常见,而且往往与多发性创伤有关。虽然横突骨折传统上被认为是稳定型损伤,但最近的研究表明其在脊柱创伤中的重要性可能被低估了。本研究旨在深入了解 TPFs 的管理和结果,评估其在识别具有临床意义的脊柱骨折和相关损伤方面的预测潜力:对一家一级创伤中心的创伤登记数据进行了回顾性分析,涵盖了 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 9 月期间的 TPF 患者。纳入标准包括经计算机断层扫描(CT)和核磁共振成像(MRI)证实为TPF的18岁或18岁以上非手术治疗患者。对有关人口统计学、损伤机制、相关损伤、疼痛管理和治疗效果的数据进行了分析。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和奥斯韦斯特里残疾指数(ODI)对疼痛严重程度和功能进行评估:共有 190 名患者参与了研究,其中男性居多(129 人,占 67.9%),平均年龄为 45.7 岁。机动车事故(MVA)是入院的主要原因(44.7%)。胸腔损伤是最常见的相关病理。在研究队列中,88 名患者(46.3%)为单层 TPF,102 名患者(53.7%)为多层骨折。分析表明,这两组患者之间存在明显差异,多层次 TPF 患者伴发损伤的频率更高,需要住院或手术治疗的比例也明显更高。与单层 TPF 患者相比,多层 TPF 患者的初始疼痛和残疾评分更高。在3个月的随访中,两组患者的VAS和ODI评分均有明显下降:结论:以往被认为是轻微损伤的 TPF 显示出明显的疼痛和功能限制。结论:TPF 以前被认为是轻微损伤,但会造成严重的疼痛和功能限制,通常会伴随全身性病变,尤其是多层次骨折,因此有必要采用多学科方法进行治疗。保护、休息、冰敷、加压、抬高"(PRICE)方法,包括非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和肌肉松弛剂,以及必要时的项圈或支架支撑,在疼痛控制和功能改善方面证明是有效的。这些研究结果强调了将 TPF 视为复杂损伤的重要性,需要采取量身定制的管理策略。有必要在医疗服务提供者之间开展进一步的研究和合作,以完善治疗方法并优化 TPFs 患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信