Economic evaluation of automated external defibrillator deployment in public settings for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

Jalal Arabloo, Elaheh Ahmadizadeh, Aziz Rezapour, Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadeh, Vahid Alipour, Mohammad Mehdi Peighambari, Ali Sarabi Asiabar, Aghdas Souresrafil
{"title":"Economic evaluation of automated external defibrillator deployment in public settings for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review.","authors":"Jalal Arabloo, Elaheh Ahmadizadeh, Aziz Rezapour, Seyed Jafar Ehsanzadeh, Vahid Alipour, Mohammad Mehdi Peighambari, Ali Sarabi Asiabar, Aghdas Souresrafil","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2354472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major issue in aging populations. The use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places improves cardiac arrest survival rates. The purpose of this study is to review economic evaluation studies of the use of AED technology in public settings for cardiac arrest resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our search covered 1990-2021 and included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies that analyzed cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit of the AED technology. Also, we performed the quality assessment of the studies through the checklist of quality assessment standard of health economic studies (QHES).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our inclusion criteria were met by 25 studies. AEDs are found to be cost-effective in places with a high occurrence of cardiac arrest. In addition, proper integration of drones with AEDs into existing systems has the potential to significantly improve OHCA survival rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study found that putting AEDs in high-cardiac arrest and crowded areas reduces average costs. Despite this, the costs associated with acquiring and maintaining AEDs prevent their widespread use. Further research is needed to evaluate feasibility and explore innovative strategies for AED maintenance and accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2354472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major issue in aging populations. The use of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places improves cardiac arrest survival rates. The purpose of this study is to review economic evaluation studies of the use of AED technology in public settings for cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Methods: Our search covered 1990-2021 and included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies that analyzed cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit of the AED technology. Also, we performed the quality assessment of the studies through the checklist of quality assessment standard of health economic studies (QHES).

Results: Our inclusion criteria were met by 25 studies. AEDs are found to be cost-effective in places with a high occurrence of cardiac arrest. In addition, proper integration of drones with AEDs into existing systems has the potential to significantly improve OHCA survival rates.

Conclusion: The present study found that putting AEDs in high-cardiac arrest and crowded areas reduces average costs. Despite this, the costs associated with acquiring and maintaining AEDs prevent their widespread use. Further research is needed to evaluate feasibility and explore innovative strategies for AED maintenance and accessibility.

针对院外心脏骤停在公共场所部署自动体外除颤器的经济评估:系统综述。
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是老龄人口的一个主要问题。在公共场所使用自动体外除颤器(AED)可提高心脏骤停患者的存活率。本研究旨在回顾在公共场所使用自动体外除颤器技术进行心脏骤停复苏的经济评估研究:我们的搜索范围涵盖 1990-2021 年,包括 PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Scopus 和 Web of Science。我们纳入了对自动体外除颤器技术的成本效益、成本效用和成本收益进行分析的研究。此外,我们还通过健康经济研究质量评估标准(QHES)核对表对研究进行了质量评估:结果:25 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。研究发现,在心脏骤停高发地区,自动体外除颤器具有成本效益。此外,将配备自动体外除颤器的无人机适当整合到现有系统中,有可能显著提高 OHCA 的存活率:本研究发现,在心脏骤停高发区和人群密集区放置自动体外除颤器可降低平均成本。尽管如此,购置和维护自动体外除颤器的相关费用阻碍了其广泛使用。需要进一步开展研究,评估可行性并探索 AED 维护和使用的创新策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信