Decolonising global health: why the new Pandemic Agreement should have included the principle of subsidiarity.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00186-4
Thana C de Campos-Rudinsky, Sarah L Bosha, Daniel Wainstock, Sharifah Sekalala, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Caesar Alimsinya Atuire
{"title":"Decolonising global health: why the new Pandemic Agreement should have included the principle of subsidiarity.","authors":"Thana C de Campos-Rudinsky, Sarah L Bosha, Daniel Wainstock, Sharifah Sekalala, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Caesar Alimsinya Atuire","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00186-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The negotiations for the WHO Pandemic Agreement have brought attention to issues of racism and colonialism in global health. Although the agreement aims to promote global solidarity, it fails to address these deeply embedded problems. This Viewpoint argues that not including the principle of subsidiarity into Article 4 of the agreement as a pragmatic strategy was a missed opportunity to decolonise global health governance and promote global solidarity. Subsidiarity, as a structural principle, empowers local units to make decisions and address issues at their level, fostering collaboration, coordination, and cooperation. By integrating subsidiarity, the agreement could have ensured contextually appropriate responses, empowered local communities, and achieved justice in global health. This paper discusses the elements of subsidiarity-namely, agency and non-abandonment-and highlights the need to strike a balance between them. It also maps the principle of subsidiarity within the Pandemic Agreement, emphasising the importance of creating a practical framework for its implementation. By integrating subsidiarity into the agreement, a just and decolonialised approach to pandemic prevention and response could have been closer to being realised, promoting global solidarity and addressing health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00186-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The negotiations for the WHO Pandemic Agreement have brought attention to issues of racism and colonialism in global health. Although the agreement aims to promote global solidarity, it fails to address these deeply embedded problems. This Viewpoint argues that not including the principle of subsidiarity into Article 4 of the agreement as a pragmatic strategy was a missed opportunity to decolonise global health governance and promote global solidarity. Subsidiarity, as a structural principle, empowers local units to make decisions and address issues at their level, fostering collaboration, coordination, and cooperation. By integrating subsidiarity, the agreement could have ensured contextually appropriate responses, empowered local communities, and achieved justice in global health. This paper discusses the elements of subsidiarity-namely, agency and non-abandonment-and highlights the need to strike a balance between them. It also maps the principle of subsidiarity within the Pandemic Agreement, emphasising the importance of creating a practical framework for its implementation. By integrating subsidiarity into the agreement, a just and decolonialised approach to pandemic prevention and response could have been closer to being realised, promoting global solidarity and addressing health inequities.

全球卫生非殖民化:为什么新的《大流行病协定》应包括辅助性原则?
世卫组织《大流行病协定》的谈判使人们开始关注全球卫生领域的种族主义和殖民主义问题。尽管该协议旨在促进全球团结,但却未能解决这些根深蒂固的问题。本观点认为,作为一项务实的战略,未将辅助性原则纳入协定第 4 条,是错失了一个使全球卫生治理非殖民化并促进全球团结的机会。作为一项结构性原则,辅助性赋予地方单位在其层面上决策和解决问题的权力,促进协作、协调与合作。通过纳入辅助性原则,该协议本可确保根据具体情况采取适当的应对措施,增强地方社区的能力,并在全球卫生领域实现公正。本文讨论了辅助性的要素--即代理和不放弃--并强调了在两者之间取得平衡的必要性。本文还描绘了《大流行病协议》中的辅助性原则,强调了建立一个切实可行的实施框架的重要性。通过将辅助性原则纳入协议,一种公正的、非殖民地化的大流行病预防和应对方法本可以更接近实现,从而促进全球团结并解决卫生不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信