The significance of paramedic communication during women’s birth experiences: A scoping review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
{"title":"The significance of paramedic communication during women’s birth experiences: A scoping review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Internationally, over one-third of women experience birth trauma, leading to adverse mental health outcomes. Poor communication with healthcare professionals is a primary contributing factor. Paramedics attend various clinical presentations, including childbirth, yet their potential impact on women's birth experiences has been largely overlooked.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework. The search identified 1015 potentially suitable articles, and 5 articles met the inclusion criteria. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis from a feminist standpoint.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three themes were generated: 1. <em>First Impressions Count:</em> paramedic demeanour impacted the woman's sense of safety and perception of paramedic clinical competence. 2. <em>Choice as a Pathway to Control:</em> when paramedics involved women in decision-making, it led to empowerment, while non-involvement led to women becoming passive participants. 3. <em>Exposed, Violated and Disempowered:</em> some paramedics disrespected and abused women, treating them solely as objects for the purpose of producing a baby.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This review highlights the influence of paramedic communication on women's birth experiences. While some paramedics communicated respectfully, other paramedics were the perpetrators of Obstetric Violence. Future research should inform paramedic education and improve outcomes for birthing women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 218-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X2400023X/pdfft?md5=db073b87497e7113f51febc56284a211&pid=1-s2.0-S2588994X2400023X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X2400023X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Internationally, over one-third of women experience birth trauma, leading to adverse mental health outcomes. Poor communication with healthcare professionals is a primary contributing factor. Paramedics attend various clinical presentations, including childbirth, yet their potential impact on women's birth experiences has been largely overlooked.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework. The search identified 1015 potentially suitable articles, and 5 articles met the inclusion criteria. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis from a feminist standpoint.

Results

Three themes were generated: 1. First Impressions Count: paramedic demeanour impacted the woman's sense of safety and perception of paramedic clinical competence. 2. Choice as a Pathway to Control: when paramedics involved women in decision-making, it led to empowerment, while non-involvement led to women becoming passive participants. 3. Exposed, Violated and Disempowered: some paramedics disrespected and abused women, treating them solely as objects for the purpose of producing a baby.

Conclusions

This review highlights the influence of paramedic communication on women's birth experiences. While some paramedics communicated respectfully, other paramedics were the perpetrators of Obstetric Violence. Future research should inform paramedic education and improve outcomes for birthing women.

在妇女分娩过程中辅助医务人员沟通的重要性:范围综述。
背景:在国际上,超过三分之一的妇女经历过分娩创伤,导致不良的心理健康后果。与医护人员沟通不畅是主要原因。辅助医务人员参与了包括分娩在内的各种临床表现,但他们对妇女分娩经历的潜在影响却在很大程度上被忽视了:按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的方法框架进行了系统的文献检索。搜索共发现 1015 篇潜在的合适文章,其中 5 篇符合纳入标准。从女性主义立场出发,采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析:产生了三个主题:1.第一印象很重要:辅助医务人员的举止影响了女性的安全感和对辅助医务人员临床能力的感知。2.2. 选择是控制的途径:当辅助医务人员让妇女参与决策时,会赋予妇女权力,而不参与则会使妇女成为被动的参与者。3.暴露、侵犯和剥夺权力:一些辅助医务人员不尊重和虐待妇女,只把她们当作生孩子的物品:本综述强调了辅助医务人员的沟通对产妇分娩经历的影响。虽然有些辅助医务人员的沟通方式令人尊敬,但有些辅助医务人员却是产科暴力的实施者。未来的研究应为辅助医务人员的教育提供依据,并改善分娩妇女的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信