Outcomes associated with initial narrow-spectrum versus broad-spectrum antibiotics in children hospitalized with urinary tract infections

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica L. Markham MD, MSc, Alaina Burns PharmD, BCPPS, Matthew Hall PhD, Matthew J. Molloy MD, MPH, John R. Stephens MD, Elisha McCoy MD, Irma T. Ugalde MD, MBE, Michael J. Steiner MD, MPH, Jillian M. Cotter MD, MSCS, Samantha A. House DO, MPH, Megan E. Collins MD, Andrew G. Yu MD, Michael J. Tchou MD, MSc, Samir S. Shah MD, MSCE
{"title":"Outcomes associated with initial narrow-spectrum versus broad-spectrum antibiotics in children hospitalized with urinary tract infections","authors":"Jessica L. Markham MD, MSc,&nbsp;Alaina Burns PharmD, BCPPS,&nbsp;Matthew Hall PhD,&nbsp;Matthew J. Molloy MD, MPH,&nbsp;John R. Stephens MD,&nbsp;Elisha McCoy MD,&nbsp;Irma T. Ugalde MD, MBE,&nbsp;Michael J. Steiner MD, MPH,&nbsp;Jillian M. Cotter MD, MSCS,&nbsp;Samantha A. House DO, MPH,&nbsp;Megan E. Collins MD,&nbsp;Andrew G. Yu MD,&nbsp;Michael J. Tchou MD, MSc,&nbsp;Samir S. Shah MD, MSCE","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to describe the proportion of children hospitalized with urinary tract infections (UTIs) who receive initial narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics across children's hospitals and explore whether the use of initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics is associated with different outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 2 months to 17 years hospitalized with UTI (inclusive of pyelonephritis) using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome and Measures</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed the proportions of children initially receiving narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics; additionally, we compiled antibiogram data for common uropathogenic organisms from participating hospitals to compare with the observed antibiotic susceptibility patterns. We examined the association of antibiotic type with adjusted outcomes including length of stay (LOS), costs, and 7- and 30-day emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 10,740 hospitalizations for UTI across 39 hospitals. Approximately 5% of encounters demonstrated initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics, with hospital-level narrow-spectrum use ranging from &lt;1% to 25%. Approximately 80% of hospital antibiograms demonstrated &gt;80% <i>Escherichia coli</i> susceptibility to cefazolin. In adjusted models, those who received initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics had shorter LOS (narrow-spectrum: 33.1 [95% confidence interval; CI]: 30.8–35.4] h vs. broad-spectrum: 46.1 [95% CI: 44.1–48.2] h) and reduced costs (narrow-spectrum: $4570 [$3751–5568] versus broad-spectrum: $5699 [$5005–$6491]). There were no differences in ED revisits or hospital readmissions. In summary, children's hospitals have low rates of narrow-spectrum antibiotic use for UTIs despite many reporting high rates of cefazolin-susceptible <i>E. coli</i>. These findings, coupled with the observed decreased LOS and costs among those receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics, highlight potential antibiotic stewardship opportunities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe the proportion of children hospitalized with urinary tract infections (UTIs) who receive initial narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics across children's hospitals and explore whether the use of initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics is associated with different outcomes.

Design, Setting and Participants

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of children aged 2 months to 17 years hospitalized with UTI (inclusive of pyelonephritis) using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.

Main Outcome and Measures

We analyzed the proportions of children initially receiving narrow- versus broad-spectrum antibiotics; additionally, we compiled antibiogram data for common uropathogenic organisms from participating hospitals to compare with the observed antibiotic susceptibility patterns. We examined the association of antibiotic type with adjusted outcomes including length of stay (LOS), costs, and 7- and 30-day emergency department (ED) revisits and hospital readmissions.

Results

We identified 10,740 hospitalizations for UTI across 39 hospitals. Approximately 5% of encounters demonstrated initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics, with hospital-level narrow-spectrum use ranging from <1% to 25%. Approximately 80% of hospital antibiograms demonstrated >80% Escherichia coli susceptibility to cefazolin. In adjusted models, those who received initial narrow-spectrum antibiotics had shorter LOS (narrow-spectrum: 33.1 [95% confidence interval; CI]: 30.8–35.4] h vs. broad-spectrum: 46.1 [95% CI: 44.1–48.2] h) and reduced costs (narrow-spectrum: $4570 [$3751–5568] versus broad-spectrum: $5699 [$5005–$6491]). There were no differences in ED revisits or hospital readmissions. In summary, children's hospitals have low rates of narrow-spectrum antibiotic use for UTIs despite many reporting high rates of cefazolin-susceptible E. coli. These findings, coupled with the observed decreased LOS and costs among those receiving narrow-spectrum antibiotics, highlight potential antibiotic stewardship opportunities.

Abstract Image

泌尿道感染住院患儿初始使用窄谱抗生素与广谱抗生素的相关结果。
研究目的本研究旨在描述各儿童医院中因尿路感染(UTI)住院的儿童最初使用窄谱抗生素与广谱抗生素的比例,并探讨最初使用窄谱抗生素是否与不同的治疗结果有关:我们利用儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)数据库对因UTI(包括肾盂肾炎)住院的2个月至17岁儿童进行了回顾性队列分析:我们分析了最初接受窄谱抗生素和广谱抗生素治疗的儿童比例;此外,我们还汇编了参与医院常见尿路病原菌的抗生素图谱数据,以便与观察到的抗生素敏感性模式进行比较。我们研究了抗生素类型与调整后结果的关系,包括住院时间(LOS)、费用、7 天和 30 天急诊科(ED)复诊率和再入院率:我们在 39 家医院中发现了 10,740 例UTI 住院病例。约有 5% 的患者首次使用了窄谱抗生素,医院层面的窄谱抗生素使用率从大肠埃希菌敏感率 80% 到头孢唑啉不等。在调整后的模型中,首次使用窄谱抗生素的患者的住院时间更短(窄谱:33.1(95% 置信区间[CI]:30.8-35.4)小时,广谱:46.1(95% 置信区间:44.1-48.2)小时),费用更低[窄谱:4570 美元(3751-5568 美元),广谱:5699 美元(5005-6491 美元)]。急诊室复诊率和再住院率没有差异。总之,尽管许多儿童医院报告的头孢唑啉敏感大肠杆菌感染率较高,但窄谱抗生素在UTI中的使用率较低。这些发现以及观察到的接受窄谱抗生素治疗的患者的住院时间和费用的减少,凸显了潜在的抗生素监管机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信