Benefits and Limits of Phasing Alleles for Network Inference of Allopolyploid Complexes.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
George P Tiley, Andrew A Crowl, Paul S Manos, Emily B Sessa, Claudia Solís-Lemus, Anne D Yoder, J Gordon Burleigh
{"title":"Benefits and Limits of Phasing Alleles for Network Inference of Allopolyploid Complexes.","authors":"George P Tiley, Andrew A Crowl, Paul S Manos, Emily B Sessa, Claudia Solís-Lemus, Anne D Yoder, J Gordon Burleigh","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurately reconstructing the reticulate histories of polyploids remains a central challenge for understanding plant evolution. Although phylogenetic networks can provide insights into relationships among polyploid lineages, inferring networks may be hindered by the complexities of homology determination in polyploid taxa. We use simulations to show that phasing alleles from allopolyploid individuals can improve phylogenetic network inference under the multispecies coalescent by obtaining the true network with fewer loci compared with haplotype consensus sequences or sequences with heterozygous bases represented as ambiguity codes. Phased allelic data can also improve divergence time estimates for networks, which is helpful for evaluating allopolyploid speciation hypotheses and proposing mechanisms of speciation. To achieve these outcomes in empirical data, we present a novel pipeline that leverages a recently developed phasing algorithm to reliably phase alleles from polyploids. This pipeline is especially appropriate for target enrichment data, where the depth of coverage is typically high enough to phase entire loci. We provide an empirical example in the North American Dryopteris fern complex that demonstrates insights from phased data as well as the challenges of network inference. We establish that our pipeline (PATÉ: Phased Alleles from Target Enrichment data) is capable of recovering a high proportion of phased loci from both diploids and polyploids. These data may improve network estimates compared with using haplotype consensus assemblies by accurately inferring the direction of gene flow, but statistical nonidentifiability of phylogenetic networks poses a barrier to inferring the evolutionary history of reticulate complexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":"666-682"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately reconstructing the reticulate histories of polyploids remains a central challenge for understanding plant evolution. Although phylogenetic networks can provide insights into relationships among polyploid lineages, inferring networks may be hindered by the complexities of homology determination in polyploid taxa. We use simulations to show that phasing alleles from allopolyploid individuals can improve phylogenetic network inference under the multispecies coalescent by obtaining the true network with fewer loci compared with haplotype consensus sequences or sequences with heterozygous bases represented as ambiguity codes. Phased allelic data can also improve divergence time estimates for networks, which is helpful for evaluating allopolyploid speciation hypotheses and proposing mechanisms of speciation. To achieve these outcomes in empirical data, we present a novel pipeline that leverages a recently developed phasing algorithm to reliably phase alleles from polyploids. This pipeline is especially appropriate for target enrichment data, where the depth of coverage is typically high enough to phase entire loci. We provide an empirical example in the North American Dryopteris fern complex that demonstrates insights from phased data as well as the challenges of network inference. We establish that our pipeline (PATÉ: Phased Alleles from Target Enrichment data) is capable of recovering a high proportion of phased loci from both diploids and polyploids. These data may improve network estimates compared with using haplotype consensus assemblies by accurately inferring the direction of gene flow, but statistical nonidentifiability of phylogenetic networks poses a barrier to inferring the evolutionary history of reticulate complexes.

异源多倍体复合体网络推断中分阶段等位基因的优势与局限性
准确重建多倍体的网状历史仍然是了解植物进化的核心挑战。虽然系统发育网络可以让人们深入了解多倍体系之间的关系,但推断网络可能会受到多倍体类群同源性测定复杂性的阻碍。我们通过模拟实验表明,与单倍型共识序列或以模糊代码表示杂合碱基的序列相比,从异源多倍体个体中分期等位基因可以用较少的位点获得真正的网络,从而改善多物种聚合下的系统发生网络推断。分阶段等位基因数据还能改善网络的分歧时间估计,这有助于评估全多倍体物种形成假说和提出物种形成机制。为了在实证数据中取得这些成果,我们提出了一种新的方法,利用最近开发的相位算法对来自多倍体的等位基因进行可靠的相位分析。该管道尤其适用于目标富集数据,因为目标富集数据的覆盖深度通常很高,足以对整个基因座进行分期。我们提供了一个北美蕨类植物干蕨复合体的经验实例,展示了分阶段数据的启示以及网络推断所面临的挑战。我们发现,我们的管道(PATÉ:从目标富集数据中分期等位基因)能够从二倍体和多倍体中恢复很高比例的分期基因座。与使用单倍型共识组装相比,这些数据可以通过准确推断基因流的方向来改进网络估计,但系统发生网络的统计不可识别性对推断网状复合体的进化历史构成了障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信