Communication rules regarding support seeking in patients with a physical illness, according to people with a Surinamese or a Dutch cultural background

IF 3.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Galaxy Rokadji, Arie Dijkstra
{"title":"Communication rules regarding support seeking in patients with a physical illness, according to people with a Surinamese or a Dutch cultural background","authors":"Galaxy Rokadji,&nbsp;Arie Dijkstra","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>People with different cultural backgrounds can evaluate the appropriateness of direct and indirect support seeking differently. In this study we explored how direct and indirect communication rules for verbal support seeking by patients with diabetes were perceived among Dutch and Surinamese female participants, and whether the appropriateness differed for the ingroup, outgroup and intercultural support seeker-support provider interactions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study applied a 2 (direct versus indirect support seeking) X 2 (Surinamese patient versus Dutch patient) X 2 (Surinamese support provider versus Dutch support provider)-design. Dutch and Surinamese participants (<em>N</em> = 686) were randomly assigned to one of the eight conditions in which they were provided with a depiction of the patient, the direct or indirect request for help, and the help provider. The main outcome was the rated appropriateness of the help-seeking request in the specific context.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results revealed a significant main effect of communication style: both, Surinamese and Dutch participants evaluated the direct help-seeking as more appropriate compared to indirect help-seeking, independent of patient or provider culture. This effect was particularly strong in participants who scored high on the individual difference in independent self, as shown by a significant interaction.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Literature usually identifies that Surinamese and Dutch populations have different cultural backgrounds and values that express themselves in different attitudes, in general more collectivistic and more individualistic, respectively. However, with regard to help seeking preferences the study results did not verify this expectation. These findings underscore the importance of the support providers’ role in assessing and understanding the individuals’ communication style with regard to help-seeking, rather than assuming communication preferences on the basis of cultural background.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000254/pdfft?md5=7b462b203c1b60784f8583b97b76619f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666623524000254-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623524000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

People with different cultural backgrounds can evaluate the appropriateness of direct and indirect support seeking differently. In this study we explored how direct and indirect communication rules for verbal support seeking by patients with diabetes were perceived among Dutch and Surinamese female participants, and whether the appropriateness differed for the ingroup, outgroup and intercultural support seeker-support provider interactions.

Methods

The study applied a 2 (direct versus indirect support seeking) X 2 (Surinamese patient versus Dutch patient) X 2 (Surinamese support provider versus Dutch support provider)-design. Dutch and Surinamese participants (N = 686) were randomly assigned to one of the eight conditions in which they were provided with a depiction of the patient, the direct or indirect request for help, and the help provider. The main outcome was the rated appropriateness of the help-seeking request in the specific context.

Results

The results revealed a significant main effect of communication style: both, Surinamese and Dutch participants evaluated the direct help-seeking as more appropriate compared to indirect help-seeking, independent of patient or provider culture. This effect was particularly strong in participants who scored high on the individual difference in independent self, as shown by a significant interaction.

Discussion

Literature usually identifies that Surinamese and Dutch populations have different cultural backgrounds and values that express themselves in different attitudes, in general more collectivistic and more individualistic, respectively. However, with regard to help seeking preferences the study results did not verify this expectation. These findings underscore the importance of the support providers’ role in assessing and understanding the individuals’ communication style with regard to help-seeking, rather than assuming communication preferences on the basis of cultural background.

有苏里南或荷兰文化背景的人在寻求身体疾病患者支持方面的交流规则
目的不同文化背景的人对直接和间接寻求支持的适当性会有不同的评价。在这项研究中,我们探讨了荷兰和苏里南女性参与者如何看待糖尿病患者在寻求口头支持时的直接和间接交流规则,以及在群体内、群体外和跨文化支持寻求者与支持提供者之间的互动中,适当性是否有所不同。荷兰和苏里南的参与者(N = 686)被随机分配到八个条件中的一个,在这八个条件中,他们将得到患者的描述、直接或间接的求助请求以及求助者。主要结果是对求助请求在特定情境中的恰当性进行评分。结果显示,沟通方式对主要结果有显著影响:苏里南和荷兰的参与者都认为直接求助比间接求助更恰当,这与患者或提供者的文化背景无关。文献通常认为,苏里南人和荷兰人有着不同的文化背景和价值观,这表现在他们不同的态度上,一般来说,他们分别更倾向于集体主义和个人主义。然而,在求助偏好方面,研究结果并没有验证这一预期。这些研究结果强调了提供支持者在评估和了解个人在寻求帮助方面的交流方式,而不是根据文化背景来假定交流偏好的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信