Improving Prostate MR Image Quality in Practice—Initial Results From the ACR Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Improving Prostate MR Image Quality in Practice—Initial Results From the ACR Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Variability in prostate MRI quality is an increasingly recognized problem that negatively affects patient care. This report aims to describe the results and key learnings of the first cohort of the ACR Learning Network Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Teams from five organizations in the United States were trained on a structured improvement method. After reaching a consensus on image quality and auditing their images using the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) system, teams conducted a current state analysis to identify barriers to obtaining high-quality images. Through plan-do-study-act cycles involving frontline staff, each site designed and tested interventions targeting image quality key drivers. The percentage of examinations meeting quality criteria (ie, PI-QUAL score ≥4) was plotted on a run chart, and project progress was reviewed in weekly meetings. At the collaborative level, the goal was to increase the percentage of examinations with PI-QUAL ≥4 to at least 85%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across 2,380 examinations audited, the mean weekly rates of prostate MR examinations meeting image quality criteria increased from 67% (range: 60%-74%) at baseline to 87% (range: 80%-97%) upon program completion. The most commonly employed interventions were MR protocol adjustments, development and implementation of patient preparation instructions, personnel training, and development of an auditing process mechanism.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A learning network model, in which organizations share knowledge and work together toward a common goal, can improve prostate MR image quality at multiple sites simultaneously. The inaugural cohort’s key learnings provide a road map for improvement on a broader scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024004162/pdfft?md5=b2402517ef751a53ddb86a9bb1f66625&pid=1-s2.0-S1546144024004162-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024004162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Variability in prostate MRI quality is an increasingly recognized problem that negatively affects patient care. This report aims to describe the results and key learnings of the first cohort of the ACR Learning Network Prostate MR Image Quality Improvement Collaborative.

Methods

Teams from five organizations in the United States were trained on a structured improvement method. After reaching a consensus on image quality and auditing their images using the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) system, teams conducted a current state analysis to identify barriers to obtaining high-quality images. Through plan-do-study-act cycles involving frontline staff, each site designed and tested interventions targeting image quality key drivers. The percentage of examinations meeting quality criteria (ie, PI-QUAL score ≥4) was plotted on a run chart, and project progress was reviewed in weekly meetings. At the collaborative level, the goal was to increase the percentage of examinations with PI-QUAL ≥4 to at least 85%.

Results

Across 2,380 examinations audited, the mean weekly rates of prostate MR examinations meeting image quality criteria increased from 67% (range: 60%-74%) at baseline to 87% (range: 80%-97%) upon program completion. The most commonly employed interventions were MR protocol adjustments, development and implementation of patient preparation instructions, personnel training, and development of an auditing process mechanism.

Conclusion

A learning network model, in which organizations share knowledge and work together toward a common goal, can improve prostate MR image quality at multiple sites simultaneously. The inaugural cohort’s key learnings provide a road map for improvement on a broader scale.

在实践中提高前列腺 MR 图像质量--ACR 前列腺 MR 图像质量提高合作组织的初步成果。
目的:前列腺磁共振成像质量的不一致性是一个日益公认的问题,它对患者护理产生了负面影响。本报告旨在介绍 ACR 学习网络前列腺 MR 图像质量改进协作项目第一批学员的成果和主要心得:来自美国五家机构的团队接受了结构化改进方法的培训。在就图像质量达成共识并使用前列腺成像质量(PI-QUAL)系统对其图像进行审核后,各小组进行了现状分析,以确定获得高质量图像的障碍。通过有一线员工参与的 "计划-实施-研究-行动 "周期,每个站点都设计并测试了针对图像质量关键驱动因素的干预措施。符合质量标准(即 PI-QUAL 分数≥4)的检查百分比被绘制在运行图上,并在每周会议上对项目进展情况进行审查。在合作层面,目标是将 PI-QUAL ≥ 4 分的考试百分比至少提高到 85%:结果:在接受审核的 2380 例检查中,符合图像质量标准的前列腺 MR 检查的每周平均比例从基线时的 67%(范围:60-74%)提高到计划完成时的 87%(范围:80-97%)。最常采用的干预措施包括磁共振检查方案调整、制定和实施患者准备指导、人员培训以及制定审核流程机制:在学习网络模式下,各组织共享知识并为实现共同目标而合作,可同时提高多个地点的前列腺磁共振成像质量。首批学员的主要学习成果为更大范围的改进提供了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信