Extremes of Emergency Department Boarding are Associated With Poorer Financial Performance Among Hospitals.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-23-00150
Anthony M Napoli, Shihab Ali, Janette Baird, Dan Shanin, Nick Jouriles
{"title":"Extremes of Emergency Department Boarding are Associated With Poorer Financial Performance Among Hospitals.","authors":"Anthony M Napoli, Shihab Ali, Janette Baird, Dan Shanin, Nick Jouriles","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-23-00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Boarding emergency department (ED) patients is associated with reductions in quality of care, patient safety and experience, and ED operational efficiency. However, ED boarding is ultimately reflective of inefficiencies in hospital capacity management. The ability of a hospital to accommodate variability in patient flow presumably affects its financial performance, but this relationship is not well studied. We investigated the relationship between ED boarding and hospital financial performance measures. Our objective was to see if there was an association between key financial measures of business performance and limitations in patient progression efficiency, as evidenced by ED boarding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional ED operational data were collected from the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance, a voluntarily self-reporting operational database that includes 54% of EDs in the United States. Freestanding EDs, pediatric EDs and EDs with missing boarding data were excluded. The key operational outcome variable was boarding time. We reviewed the financial information of these nonprofit institutions by accessing their Internal Revenue Service Form 990. We examined standard measures of financial performance, including return on equity, total margin, total asset turnover, and equity multiplier (EM). We studied these associations using quantile regressions of added ED volume, ED admission percentage, urban versus nonurban ED site location, trauma status, and percentage of the population receiving Medicare and Medicaid as covariates in the regression models.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Operational data were available for 892 EDs from 31 states. Of those, 127 reported a Form 990 in the year corresponding to the ED boarding measures. Median boarding time across EDs was 148 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 100-216). A significant relationship exists between boarding and the EM, along with a negative association with the hospital's total profit margin in the highest-performing hospitals (by profit margin percentage). After adjusting for the covariates in the regression model, we found that for every 10 min above 90 min of boarding, the mean EM for the top quartile increased from 245.8% to 249.5% (p < .001). In hospitals in the top 90th percentile of total margin, every 10 min beyond the median ED boarding interval led to a decrease in total margin of 0.24%.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Using the largest available national registry of ED operational data and concordant nonprofit financial reports, higher boarding among the highest-profitability hospitals (i.e., top 10%) is associated with a drag on profit margin, while hospitals with the highest boarding are associated with the highest leverage (i.e., indicated by the EM). These relationships suggest an association between a key ED indicator of hospital capacity management and overall institutional financial performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"69 3","pages":"219-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-23-00150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Boarding emergency department (ED) patients is associated with reductions in quality of care, patient safety and experience, and ED operational efficiency. However, ED boarding is ultimately reflective of inefficiencies in hospital capacity management. The ability of a hospital to accommodate variability in patient flow presumably affects its financial performance, but this relationship is not well studied. We investigated the relationship between ED boarding and hospital financial performance measures. Our objective was to see if there was an association between key financial measures of business performance and limitations in patient progression efficiency, as evidenced by ED boarding.

Methods: Cross-sectional ED operational data were collected from the Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance, a voluntarily self-reporting operational database that includes 54% of EDs in the United States. Freestanding EDs, pediatric EDs and EDs with missing boarding data were excluded. The key operational outcome variable was boarding time. We reviewed the financial information of these nonprofit institutions by accessing their Internal Revenue Service Form 990. We examined standard measures of financial performance, including return on equity, total margin, total asset turnover, and equity multiplier (EM). We studied these associations using quantile regressions of added ED volume, ED admission percentage, urban versus nonurban ED site location, trauma status, and percentage of the population receiving Medicare and Medicaid as covariates in the regression models.

Principal findings: Operational data were available for 892 EDs from 31 states. Of those, 127 reported a Form 990 in the year corresponding to the ED boarding measures. Median boarding time across EDs was 148 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 100-216). A significant relationship exists between boarding and the EM, along with a negative association with the hospital's total profit margin in the highest-performing hospitals (by profit margin percentage). After adjusting for the covariates in the regression model, we found that for every 10 min above 90 min of boarding, the mean EM for the top quartile increased from 245.8% to 249.5% (p < .001). In hospitals in the top 90th percentile of total margin, every 10 min beyond the median ED boarding interval led to a decrease in total margin of 0.24%.

Practical applications: Using the largest available national registry of ED operational data and concordant nonprofit financial reports, higher boarding among the highest-profitability hospitals (i.e., top 10%) is associated with a drag on profit margin, while hospitals with the highest boarding are associated with the highest leverage (i.e., indicated by the EM). These relationships suggest an association between a key ED indicator of hospital capacity management and overall institutional financial performance.

急诊科住院人数的极值与医院较差的财务业绩有关。
目标:急诊科(ED)病人住院与护理质量、病人安全和体验以及急诊科运行效率的下降有关。然而,急诊科病人滞留最终反映了医院容量管理的效率低下。医院适应病人流量变化的能力可能会影响其财务业绩,但这种关系并没有得到很好的研究。我们调查了急诊室住院人数与医院财务绩效指标之间的关系。我们的目标是了解业务绩效的主要财务指标与急诊室寄宿情况所反映的患者就诊效率限制之间是否存在关联:我们从急诊科标杆联盟(Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance)收集了急诊科的横向运营数据,该联盟是一个自愿自我报告的运营数据库,包括美国 54% 的急诊科。独立的急诊室、儿科急诊室和登机数据缺失的急诊室被排除在外。关键的运行结果变量是登机时间。我们查阅了这些非营利机构的国内税收署 990 表,从而审查了其财务信息。我们研究了财务绩效的标准衡量指标,包括股本回报率、总利润率、总资产周转率和股本乘数(EM)。在回归模型中,我们将增加的急诊室数量、急诊室收治比例、城市与非城市急诊室地点、外伤状况以及接受医疗保险和医疗补助的人口比例作为协变量进行了量化回归,从而研究了这些关联:主要研究结果:我们获得了 31 个州 892 家急诊室的运营数据。其中,127 家急诊室在与急诊室登机时间测量相对应的年份提交了 990 表。各急诊室的中位登机时间为 148 分钟(四分位距 [IQR]:100-216)。在表现最好的医院(按利润率百分比计算)中,住院时间与急诊室之间存在明显的关系,同时与医院的总利润率呈负相关。在对回归模型中的协变量进行调整后,我们发现寄宿时间每超过 90 分钟 10 分钟,排名前四分位的医院的平均平均住院时间就会从 245.8% 增加到 249.5%(P 实际应用):利用现有最大的全国急诊室运营数据登记簿和一致的非营利性财务报告,盈利能力最高的医院(即前 10%)的寄宿率越高,利润率就越低,而寄宿率最高的医院的杠杆率也最高(即 EM 值)。这些关系表明,医院能力管理的一个关键性 ED 指标与整体机构财务绩效之间存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信