Trends in HCAHPS Survey Scores, 2008-2019: A Quality Improvement Perspective.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002001
Megan K Beckett, Denise D Quigley, Christopher W Cohea, William G Lehrman, Chelsea Russ, Laura A Giordano, Elizabeth Goldstein, Marc N Elliott
{"title":"Trends in HCAHPS Survey Scores, 2008-2019: A Quality Improvement Perspective.","authors":"Megan K Beckett, Denise D Quigley, Christopher W Cohea, William G Lehrman, Chelsea Russ, Laura A Giordano, Elizabeth Goldstein, Marc N Elliott","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HCAHPS' 2008 initial public reporting, 2012 inclusion in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), and 2015 inclusion in Hospital Star Ratings were intended to improve patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Characterize pre-COVID-19 (2008-2019) trends in hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Describe HCAHPS score trends overall, by phase: (1) initial public reporting period (2008-2013), (2) first 2 years of HVBP (2013-2015), and (3) initial HCAHPS Star Ratings reporting (2015-2019); and by hospital characteristics (HCAHPS decile, ownership, size, teaching affiliation, and urban/rural).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 3909 HCAHPS-participating US hospitals.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>HCAHPS summary score (HCAHPS-SS) and 9 measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean 2007-2019 HCAHPS-SS improvement in most-positive-category (\"top-box\") responses was +5.2 percentage points/pp across all hospitals (where differences of 5pp, 3pp, and 1pp are \"large,\" \"medium,\" and \"small\"). Improvement rate was largest in phase 1 (+0.8/pp/year vs. +0.2pp/year and +0.1pp/year for phases 2 and 3, respectively). Improvement was largest for Overall Rating of Hospital (+8.5pp), Discharge Information (+7.3pp), and Nurse Communication (+6.5pp), smallest for Doctor Communication (+0.8pp). Some measures improved notably through phases 2 and 3 (Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness, Overall Rating of Hospital), but others slowed or reversed in Phase 3 (Communication about Medicines, Quietness). Bottom-decile hospitals improved more than other hospitals for all measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All HCAHPS measures improved rapidly 2008-2013, especially among low-performing (bottom-decile) hospitals, narrowing the range of performance and improving scores overall. This initial improvement may reflect widespread, general quality improvement (QI) efforts in lower-performing hospitals. Subsequent slower improvement following the introduction of HVBP and Star Ratings may have reflected targeted, resource-intensive QI in higher-performing hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: HCAHPS' 2008 initial public reporting, 2012 inclusion in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (HVBP), and 2015 inclusion in Hospital Star Ratings were intended to improve patient experiences.

Objectives: Characterize pre-COVID-19 (2008-2019) trends in hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores.

Research design: Describe HCAHPS score trends overall, by phase: (1) initial public reporting period (2008-2013), (2) first 2 years of HVBP (2013-2015), and (3) initial HCAHPS Star Ratings reporting (2015-2019); and by hospital characteristics (HCAHPS decile, ownership, size, teaching affiliation, and urban/rural).

Subjects: A total of 3909 HCAHPS-participating US hospitals.

Measures: HCAHPS summary score (HCAHPS-SS) and 9 measures.

Results: The mean 2007-2019 HCAHPS-SS improvement in most-positive-category ("top-box") responses was +5.2 percentage points/pp across all hospitals (where differences of 5pp, 3pp, and 1pp are "large," "medium," and "small"). Improvement rate was largest in phase 1 (+0.8/pp/year vs. +0.2pp/year and +0.1pp/year for phases 2 and 3, respectively). Improvement was largest for Overall Rating of Hospital (+8.5pp), Discharge Information (+7.3pp), and Nurse Communication (+6.5pp), smallest for Doctor Communication (+0.8pp). Some measures improved notably through phases 2 and 3 (Nurse Communication, Staff Responsiveness, Overall Rating of Hospital), but others slowed or reversed in Phase 3 (Communication about Medicines, Quietness). Bottom-decile hospitals improved more than other hospitals for all measures.

Conclusions: All HCAHPS measures improved rapidly 2008-2013, especially among low-performing (bottom-decile) hospitals, narrowing the range of performance and improving scores overall. This initial improvement may reflect widespread, general quality improvement (QI) efforts in lower-performing hospitals. Subsequent slower improvement following the introduction of HVBP and Star Ratings may have reflected targeted, resource-intensive QI in higher-performing hospitals.

2008-2019 年 HCAHPS 调查得分趋势:质量改进视角。
背景:HCAHPS 于 2008 年首次公开报告,2012 年被纳入医院价值采购计划 (HVBP),2015 年被纳入医院星级评定,旨在改善患者体验:描述 COVID-19 前(2008-2019 年)医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估(HCAHPS)得分趋势:研究设计:描述 HCAHPS 评分的整体趋势,按阶段划分:(1)最初的公开报告期(2008-2013 年),(2)HVBP 的前两年(2013-2015 年),(3)最初的 HCAHPS 星级评级报告(2015-2019 年);以及按医院特征(HCAHPS 十分位数、所有权、规模、教学附属机构和城市/农村)划分:共有 3909 家参与 HCAHPS 的美国医院:HCAHPS总分(HCAHPS-SS)和9项指标:所有医院 2007-2019 年 HCAHPS-SS 最积极类别("顶部方框")响应的平均改善率为 +5.2 个百分点/百分点(其中 5 个百分点、3 个百分点和 1 个百分点的差异为 "大"、"中 "和 "小")。第 1 阶段的改善幅度最大(+0.8 个百分点/年,第 2 和第 3 阶段分别为+0.2 个百分点/年和+0.1 个百分点/年)。医院总体评价(+8.5 个百分点)、出院信息(+7.3 个百分点)和护士沟通(+6.5 个百分点)的改善幅度最大,医生沟通(+0.8 个百分点)的改善幅度最小。一些指标在第二和第三阶段有显著改善(护士沟通、员工响应度、医院总体评价),但其他指标在第三阶段有所放缓或逆转(药品沟通、安静度)。在所有衡量标准中,排名倒数第 10 位的医院比其他医院进步更大:所有 HCAHPS 指标在 2008-2013 年间都得到了迅速改善,尤其是在表现较差的医院(倒数第 10 位)中,从而缩小了表现范围并提高了总体得分。最初的改善可能反映了表现较差的医院在质量改进(QI)方面的广泛努力。在引入 HVBP 和星级评定后,随后的改善速度放缓,这可能反映了绩效较高医院有针对性的、资源密集型 QI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信