Does the adjunctive use of autologous platelet concentrate during secondary alveolar bone grafting reduce the risk of wound dehiscence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Does the adjunctive use of autologous platelet concentrate during secondary alveolar bone grafting reduce the risk of wound dehiscence? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wound dehiscence is a common complication after secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG), leading to unfavourable surgical outcomes. Studies have shown that autologous platelet concentrates (APC) may enhance wound healing and improve outcomes. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate in patients with alveolar clefts, whether using APC and iliac crest bone graft can mitigate the likelihood of wound dehiscence formation compared with those who underwent iliac bone grafting only following SABG. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and grey literature, to include studies until July 31, 2023, without any restriction to language and time of publication. Only randomized (RCT) and controlled (CCT) clinical trials were included. Two independent reviewers screened the studies based on the predefined criteria, after which a qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted. The search yielded 821 studies, of which seven were deemed eligible for systematic review. The risk of bias assessment done using “The Cochrane collaboration tool for risk of bias assessment” for six RCTs and the “Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions” for one CCT revealed a moderate to high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of five studies showed that the overall risk of developing wound dehiscence was lower in the APC group (RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.71; p = 0.005; χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.82; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Subgroup analyses based on study design further supported these findings. Although the adjuvant use of APC for alveolar cleft reconstruction reduces the risk of wound dehiscence, more studies with increased scientific rigour and fewer confounding variables are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"52 8","pages":"Pages 895-905"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224001653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wound dehiscence is a common complication after secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG), leading to unfavourable surgical outcomes. Studies have shown that autologous platelet concentrates (APC) may enhance wound healing and improve outcomes. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate in patients with alveolar clefts, whether using APC and iliac crest bone graft can mitigate the likelihood of wound dehiscence formation compared with those who underwent iliac bone grafting only following SABG. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and grey literature, to include studies until July 31, 2023, without any restriction to language and time of publication. Only randomized (RCT) and controlled (CCT) clinical trials were included. Two independent reviewers screened the studies based on the predefined criteria, after which a qualitative and quantitative analysis was conducted. The search yielded 821 studies, of which seven were deemed eligible for systematic review. The risk of bias assessment done using “The Cochrane collaboration tool for risk of bias assessment” for six RCTs and the “Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions” for one CCT revealed a moderate to high risk of bias. The meta-analysis of five studies showed that the overall risk of developing wound dehiscence was lower in the APC group (RR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.71; p = 0.005; χ2 = 0.82; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses based on study design further supported these findings. Although the adjuvant use of APC for alveolar cleft reconstruction reduces the risk of wound dehiscence, more studies with increased scientific rigour and fewer confounding variables are warranted.

二次牙槽骨移植过程中辅助使用自体血小板浓缩物是否能降低伤口开裂的风险?系统综述与荟萃分析。
伤口开裂是继发性牙槽骨移植术(SABG)后常见的并发症,会导致不利的手术效果。研究表明,自体血小板浓缩物(APC)可促进伤口愈合,改善手术效果。因此,本综述旨在评估牙槽骨裂患者在接受 SABG 后,与仅接受髂骨移植的患者相比,使用 APC 和髂嵴植骨是否能减少伤口裂开的可能性。我们使用各种电子数据库(包括 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、EBSCOhost、Ovid MEDLINE、LILACS、Cochrane Library 和灰色文献)进行了全面的文献检索,包括 2023 年 7 月 31 日之前的研究,对语言和发表时间没有任何限制。只纳入了随机(RCT)和对照(CCT)临床试验。两位独立审稿人根据预先确定的标准对研究进行筛选,然后进行定性和定量分析。搜索结果显示有 821 项研究,其中 7 项被认为符合系统性审查的条件。使用 "Cochrane 协作偏倚风险评估工具 "对 6 项研究进行了偏倚风险评估,并使用 "非随机研究-干预措施的偏倚风险 "对 1 项 CCT 进行了偏倚风险评估,结果显示存在中度至高度偏倚风险。五项研究的荟萃分析表明,APC 组发生伤口开裂的总体风险较低(RR = 0.33;95% CI:0.16,0.71;P = 0.005;χ2 = 0.82;I2 = 0%)。基于研究设计的亚组分析进一步支持了这些发现。尽管在牙槽裂重建中辅助使用 APC 可降低伤口开裂的风险,但仍需进行更多科学严谨、混杂变量更少的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信