Does Behavior Evolve First? Correlated Responses to Selection for Voluntary Wheel-Running Behavior in House Mice.

Ecological and evolutionary physiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1086/730153
Rahim H Khan, Justin S Rhodes, Isabelle A Girard, Nicole E Schwartz, Theodore Garland
{"title":"Does Behavior Evolve First? Correlated Responses to Selection for Voluntary Wheel-Running Behavior in House Mice.","authors":"Rahim H Khan, Justin S Rhodes, Isabelle A Girard, Nicole E Schwartz, Theodore Garland","doi":"10.1086/730153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractHow traits at multiple levels of biological organization evolve in a correlated fashion in response to directional selection is poorly understood, but two popular models are the very general \"behavior evolves first\" (BEF) hypothesis and the more specific \"morphology-performance-behavior-fitness\" (MPBF) paradigm. Both acknowledge that selection often acts relatively directly on behavior and that when behavior evolves, other traits will as well but most with some lag. However, this proposition is exceedingly difficult to test in nature. Therefore, we studied correlated responses in the high-runner (HR) mouse selection experiment, in which four replicate lines have been bred for voluntary wheel-running behavior and compared with four nonselected control (C) lines. We analyzed a wide range of traits measured at generations 20-24 (with a focus on new data from generation 22), coinciding with the point at which all HR lines were reaching selection limits (plateaus). Significance levels (226 <i>P</i> values) were compared across trait types by ANOVA, and we used the positive false discovery rate to control for multiple comparisons. This meta-analysis showed that, surprisingly, the measures of performance (including maximal oxygen consumption during forced exercise) showed no evidence of having diverged between the HR and C lines, nor did any of the life history traits (e.g., litter size), whereas body mass had responded (decreased) at least as strongly as wheel running. Overall, results suggest that the HR lines of mice had evolved primarily by changes in motivation rather than performance ability at the time they were reaching selection limits. In addition, neither the BEF model nor the MPBF model of hierarchical evolution provides a particularly good fit to the HR mouse selection experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":519900,"journal":{"name":"Ecological and evolutionary physiology","volume":"97 2","pages":"97-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological and evolutionary physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/730153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractHow traits at multiple levels of biological organization evolve in a correlated fashion in response to directional selection is poorly understood, but two popular models are the very general "behavior evolves first" (BEF) hypothesis and the more specific "morphology-performance-behavior-fitness" (MPBF) paradigm. Both acknowledge that selection often acts relatively directly on behavior and that when behavior evolves, other traits will as well but most with some lag. However, this proposition is exceedingly difficult to test in nature. Therefore, we studied correlated responses in the high-runner (HR) mouse selection experiment, in which four replicate lines have been bred for voluntary wheel-running behavior and compared with four nonselected control (C) lines. We analyzed a wide range of traits measured at generations 20-24 (with a focus on new data from generation 22), coinciding with the point at which all HR lines were reaching selection limits (plateaus). Significance levels (226 P values) were compared across trait types by ANOVA, and we used the positive false discovery rate to control for multiple comparisons. This meta-analysis showed that, surprisingly, the measures of performance (including maximal oxygen consumption during forced exercise) showed no evidence of having diverged between the HR and C lines, nor did any of the life history traits (e.g., litter size), whereas body mass had responded (decreased) at least as strongly as wheel running. Overall, results suggest that the HR lines of mice had evolved primarily by changes in motivation rather than performance ability at the time they were reaching selection limits. In addition, neither the BEF model nor the MPBF model of hierarchical evolution provides a particularly good fit to the HR mouse selection experiment.

行为先进化吗?家鼠自愿轮跑行为选择的相关反应
摘要 人们对生物组织中多个层次的性状如何在定向选择的作用下以相关的方式进化还知之甚少,但有两种流行的模式,一种是非常普遍的 "行为先行进化"(BEF)假说,另一种是更具体的 "形态-性能-行为-适配性"(MPBF)模式。这两种假说都承认,选择通常会相对直接地作用于行为,当行为发生进化时,其他特征也会随之发生进化,但大多会有一定的滞后性。然而,这一命题在自然界中极难验证。因此,我们研究了高奔跑(HR)小鼠选择实验中的相关反应,在该实验中,我们培育了四个具有自主车轮奔跑行为的重复品系,并与四个未被选择的对照品系(C)进行了比较。我们分析了在第 20-24 代(重点是第 22 代的新数据)测量的一系列性状,这与所有 HR 品系达到选择极限(高原)的时间点相吻合。我们通过方差分析比较了不同性状类型的显著性水平(226 个 P 值),并使用正误发现率来控制多重比较。这项荟萃分析表明,令人惊讶的是,HR 系和 C 系之间的运动表现(包括强迫运动时的最大耗氧量)和生活史性状(如产仔数)都没有出现分化,而体重的反应(下降)至少与车轮跑一样强烈。总之,研究结果表明,HR品系小鼠在达到选择极限时,主要是通过动机的变化而不是表现能力的变化来进化的。此外,分层进化的 BEF 模型和 MPBF 模型都不能很好地适应 HR 小鼠的选择实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信