The Presence of Blood in a Strain Gauge Pressure Transducer Has a Clinical Effect on the Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Readings.

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-05-09 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001089
Emerson B Nairon, Jeslin Joseph, Abdulkadir Kamal, David R Busch, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"The Presence of Blood in a Strain Gauge Pressure Transducer Has a Clinical Effect on the Accuracy of Intracranial Pressure Readings.","authors":"Emerson B Nairon, Jeslin Joseph, Abdulkadir Kamal, David R Busch, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients admitted with cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral edema often undergo external ventricular drain (EVD) placement to monitor and manage intracranial pressure (ICP). A strain gauge transducer accompanies the EVD to convert a pressure signal to an electrical waveform and assign a numeric value to the ICP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored ICP accuracy in the presence of blood and other viscous fluid contaminates in the transducer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Preclinical comparative design study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Laboratory setting using two Natus EVDs, two strain gauge transducers, and a sealed pressure chamber.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>No human subjects or animal models were used.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A control transducer primed with saline was compared with an investigational transducer primed with blood or with saline/glycerol mixtures in mass:mass ratios of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% glycerol. Volume in a sealed chamber was manipulated to reflect changes in ICP to explore the impact of contaminates on pressure measurement.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>From 90 paired observations, ICP readings were statistically significantly different between the control (saline) and experimental (glycerol or blood) transducers. The time to a stable pressure reading was significantly different for saline vs. 25% glycerol (< 0.0005), 50% glycerol (< 0.005), 75% glycerol (< 0.0001), 100% glycerol (< 0.0005), and blood (< 0.0005). A difference in resting stable pressure was observed for saline vs. blood primed transducers (0.041).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There are statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in time to a stable pressure reading when contaminates are introduced into a closed drainage system. Changing a transducer based on the presence of blood contaminate should be considered to improve accuracy but must be weighed against the risk of introducing infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 5","pages":"e1089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11086962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patients admitted with cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral edema often undergo external ventricular drain (EVD) placement to monitor and manage intracranial pressure (ICP). A strain gauge transducer accompanies the EVD to convert a pressure signal to an electrical waveform and assign a numeric value to the ICP.

Objectives: This study explored ICP accuracy in the presence of blood and other viscous fluid contaminates in the transducer.

Design: Preclinical comparative design study.

Setting: Laboratory setting using two Natus EVDs, two strain gauge transducers, and a sealed pressure chamber.

Participants: No human subjects or animal models were used.

Interventions: A control transducer primed with saline was compared with an investigational transducer primed with blood or with saline/glycerol mixtures in mass:mass ratios of 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% glycerol. Volume in a sealed chamber was manipulated to reflect changes in ICP to explore the impact of contaminates on pressure measurement.

Measurements and main results: From 90 paired observations, ICP readings were statistically significantly different between the control (saline) and experimental (glycerol or blood) transducers. The time to a stable pressure reading was significantly different for saline vs. 25% glycerol (< 0.0005), 50% glycerol (< 0.005), 75% glycerol (< 0.0001), 100% glycerol (< 0.0005), and blood (< 0.0005). A difference in resting stable pressure was observed for saline vs. blood primed transducers (0.041).

Conclusions and relevance: There are statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in time to a stable pressure reading when contaminates are introduced into a closed drainage system. Changing a transducer based on the presence of blood contaminate should be considered to improve accuracy but must be weighed against the risk of introducing infection.

应变片压力传感器中的血液对颅内压读数的准确性有临床影响。
重要性:因脑出血或脑水肿入院的患者通常需要接受脑室外引流管(EVD)置入术,以监测和管理颅内压(ICP)。EVD 配有应变计传感器,可将压力信号转换为电波,并为 ICP 赋值:本研究探讨了在传感器中存在血液和其他粘性液体污染物的情况下 ICP 的准确性:临床前比较设计研究:实验室环境:使用两台 Natus EVD、两个应变计传感器和一个密封压力室:干预措施:干预措施:使用生理盐水的对照传感器与使用血液或质量比为 25%、50%、75% 和 100% 甘油的生理盐水/甘油混合物的研究型传感器进行比较。通过调节密封舱的容积来反映 ICP 的变化,以探索污染物对压力测量的影响:在 90 次配对观察中,对照组(生理盐水)和实验组(甘油或血液)传感器的 ICP 读数在统计学上有显著差异。生理盐水与 25% 甘油(< 0.0005)、50% 甘油(< 0.005)、75% 甘油(< 0.0001)、100% 甘油(< 0.0005)和血液(< 0.0005)相比,获得稳定压力读数的时间有显著差异。观察到生理盐水与血液引流传感器的静息稳定压存在差异(0.041):当污染物进入密闭引流系统时,在获得稳定压力读数的时间上存在明显的统计学差异和临床相关性。应考虑根据血液污染物的存在更换传感器,以提高准确性,但必须权衡引入感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信