Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Study Findings Differ Between Patients With Double-crush Syndrome and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicholas B Pohl, Rajkishen Narayanan, Parker L Brush, Yunsoo Lee, Rabia Qureshi, Arun Kanhere, M Lauren Micou, Sebastian I Fras, Ian David Kaye, John J Mangan, Mark F Kurd, Michael J Mehnert, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Preoperative Electrodiagnostic Study Findings Differ Between Patients With Double-crush Syndrome and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Propensity Matched Analysis.","authors":"Nicholas B Pohl, Rajkishen Narayanan, Parker L Brush, Yunsoo Lee, Rabia Qureshi, Arun Kanhere, M Lauren Micou, Sebastian I Fras, Ian David Kaye, John J Mangan, Mark F Kurd, Michael J Mehnert, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Double-crush syndrome (DCS) represents a condition that involves peripheral nerve compression in combination with spinal nerve root impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare electrodiagnostic study (EDS) results in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome with those undergoing both CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for DCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving an isolated CTR were compared with those undergoing CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion within two years of CTR. The latter group was defined as our DCS cohort. Electrodiagnostic study results were collected which included sensory and motor nerve conduction data as well as electromyogram (EMG) findings. All electrodiagnostic studies were done before CTR in both sets of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four patients with DCS and 137 CTR-only patients were included. Patients with DCS were found to have decreased sensory onset latency (3.51 vs 4.01; P = 0.015) and peak latency (4.25 vs 5.17; P = 0.004) compared with the CTR-only patients. Patients with DCS had slower wrist motor velocity (30.5 vs 47.7; P = 0.012), decreased elbow motor latency (9.62 vs 10.6; P = 0.015), and faster elbow motor velocity (56.0 vs 49.4; P = 0.031). EMG results showed that patients with DCS were more likely to have positive findings in the biceps (31.9% vs 1.96%; P < 0.001) and triceps (24.4% vs 2.97%; P < 0.001), but not abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (45.7% vs 37.9%; P = 0.459).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified changes on EDS between patients with and without DCS. In patients with DCS, sensory nerve studies showed shorter peak and onset latency than in CTR-only patients. Interestingly, DCS and CTR-only patients had different patterns of wrist and elbow motor nerve conduction. Providers observing positive EMG findings proximal to the APB should raise their suspicion for possible cervical radiculopathy and when present with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms, should also consider DCS in their diagnostic differential.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"856-861"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Double-crush syndrome (DCS) represents a condition that involves peripheral nerve compression in combination with spinal nerve root impingement. The purpose of this study was to compare electrodiagnostic study (EDS) results in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR) for carpal tunnel syndrome with those undergoing both CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for DCS.

Methods: Patients receiving an isolated CTR were compared with those undergoing CTR and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion within two years of CTR. The latter group was defined as our DCS cohort. Electrodiagnostic study results were collected which included sensory and motor nerve conduction data as well as electromyogram (EMG) findings. All electrodiagnostic studies were done before CTR in both sets of patients.

Results: Fifty-four patients with DCS and 137 CTR-only patients were included. Patients with DCS were found to have decreased sensory onset latency (3.51 vs 4.01; P = 0.015) and peak latency (4.25 vs 5.17; P = 0.004) compared with the CTR-only patients. Patients with DCS had slower wrist motor velocity (30.5 vs 47.7; P = 0.012), decreased elbow motor latency (9.62 vs 10.6; P = 0.015), and faster elbow motor velocity (56.0 vs 49.4; P = 0.031). EMG results showed that patients with DCS were more likely to have positive findings in the biceps (31.9% vs 1.96%; P < 0.001) and triceps (24.4% vs 2.97%; P < 0.001), but not abductor pollicis brevis (APB) (45.7% vs 37.9%; P = 0.459).

Conclusion: We identified changes on EDS between patients with and without DCS. In patients with DCS, sensory nerve studies showed shorter peak and onset latency than in CTR-only patients. Interestingly, DCS and CTR-only patients had different patterns of wrist and elbow motor nerve conduction. Providers observing positive EMG findings proximal to the APB should raise their suspicion for possible cervical radiculopathy and when present with carpal tunnel syndrome-like symptoms, should also consider DCS in their diagnostic differential.

双挤压综合征和腕管综合征患者术前电诊断研究结果的差异:倾向匹配分析
简介双挤压综合征(DCS)是一种周围神经受压并伴有脊神经根撞击的病症。本研究旨在比较接受腕管松解术(CTR)治疗腕管综合征的患者与同时接受CTR和颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术治疗双挤压综合征的患者的电诊断研究(EDS)结果:将单独接受腕管松解术的患者与在腕管松解术后两年内同时接受腕管松解术和颈椎前路椎间盘切除及融合术的患者进行比较。后一组患者被定义为我们的 DCS 队列。收集的电诊断研究结果包括感觉和运动神经传导数据以及肌电图(EMG)结果。两组患者的所有电诊断检查均在 CTR 之前完成:结果:纳入了 54 名 DCS 患者和 137 名仅接受 CTR 的患者。与仅接受 CTR 的患者相比,DCS 患者的感觉起始潜伏期(3.51 vs 4.01;P = 0.015)和峰值潜伏期(4.25 vs 5.17;P = 0.004)均有所缩短。DCS患者的腕部运动速度较慢(30.5 vs 47.7;P = 0.012),肘部运动潜伏期较短(9.62 vs 10.6;P = 0.015),肘部运动速度较快(56.0 vs 49.4;P = 0.031)。EMG结果显示,DCS患者的肱二头肌(31.9% vs 1.96%;P <0.001)和肱三头肌(24.4% vs 2.97%;P <0.001)出现阳性结果的几率更高,但股骨外展肌(APB)(45.7% vs 37.9%;P = 0.459)却不高:我们发现了患有和未患有 DCS 的患者在 EDS 上的变化。与仅有 CTR 的患者相比,DCS 患者的感觉神经研究显示出更短的峰值和起始潜伏期。有趣的是,DCS 和纯 CTR 患者的腕部和肘部运动神经传导模式不同。医务人员在观察到APB近端EMG阳性结果时,应怀疑可能存在颈椎病,当出现类似腕管综合征的症状时,也应在诊断鉴别中考虑DCS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信