Experiences of Malaysian primary healthcare providers with vaccine hesitancy: A qualitative study.

Q3 Nursing
Malaysian Family Physician Pub Date : 2024-04-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.51866/oa.388
Megat Mohamad Amirul Amzar Megat Hashim, Nik Sherina Haidi Hanafi
{"title":"Experiences of Malaysian primary healthcare providers with vaccine hesitancy: A qualitative study.","authors":"Megat Mohamad Amirul Amzar Megat Hashim, Nik Sherina Haidi Hanafi","doi":"10.51866/oa.388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy was declared as one of the ten threats to global public health by the World Health Organization in 2019. It undermines the effort towards eradication of vaccine-preventable diseases. Healthcare providers, who are directly involved in vaccination services and vaccine advocacies, are important in combating vaccine hesitancy. Studies have shown that vaccine refusers have various reasons for refusal including distrust towards healthcare providers. Hence, it is important to understand healthcare providers' perspectives. This study aimed to explore primary healthcare providers (PHCPs)' experiences in dealing with vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted among public PHCPs across six states in Malaysia. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used. Fifteen primary healthcare doctors and nurses underwent in-depth interviews. Recruitment was stopped when data saturation was achieved. Data were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged: 1) views towards vaccination and vaccine hesitancy, 2) disparity in strategies and resources used among PHCPs, 3) fixed-minded vaccine deniers and religious incompatibility: the two towering hurdles and 4) negative impact after encounters with vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malaysian PHCPs encounter negative experiences with vaccine hesitancy, impacting them negatively. These experiences are attributed to the challenges and lack of standardised resources for reference. These findings suggest the development of a more flexible policy, a training module inclusive of all professional roles and a standardised repository of resources for managing vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":40017,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Family Physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51866/oa.388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy was declared as one of the ten threats to global public health by the World Health Organization in 2019. It undermines the effort towards eradication of vaccine-preventable diseases. Healthcare providers, who are directly involved in vaccination services and vaccine advocacies, are important in combating vaccine hesitancy. Studies have shown that vaccine refusers have various reasons for refusal including distrust towards healthcare providers. Hence, it is important to understand healthcare providers' perspectives. This study aimed to explore primary healthcare providers (PHCPs)' experiences in dealing with vaccine hesitancy.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted among public PHCPs across six states in Malaysia. Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used. Fifteen primary healthcare doctors and nurses underwent in-depth interviews. Recruitment was stopped when data saturation was achieved. Data were thematically analysed.

Results: Four themes emerged: 1) views towards vaccination and vaccine hesitancy, 2) disparity in strategies and resources used among PHCPs, 3) fixed-minded vaccine deniers and religious incompatibility: the two towering hurdles and 4) negative impact after encounters with vaccine hesitancy.

Conclusion: Malaysian PHCPs encounter negative experiences with vaccine hesitancy, impacting them negatively. These experiences are attributed to the challenges and lack of standardised resources for reference. These findings suggest the development of a more flexible policy, a training module inclusive of all professional roles and a standardised repository of resources for managing vaccine hesitancy.

马来西亚初级医疗保健提供者对疫苗犹豫不决的经历:定性研究。
导言:世界卫生组织于 2019 年宣布,疫苗接种犹豫不决是全球公共卫生面临的十大威胁之一。它破坏了根除疫苗可预防疾病的努力。直接参与疫苗接种服务和疫苗宣传的医疗保健提供者对于消除疫苗犹豫不决现象非常重要。研究表明,疫苗拒绝接种者有各种拒绝接种的原因,包括对医疗保健提供者的不信任。因此,了解医疗服务提供者的观点非常重要。本研究旨在探讨初级医疗保健提供者(PHCPs)在处理疫苗犹豫问题时的经验:这项定性研究在马来西亚六个州的公立初级卫生保健提供者中进行。采用了有目的抽样和滚雪球抽样方法。15 名初级保健医生和护士接受了深入访谈。当数据达到饱和时停止招募。对数据进行了主题分析:结果:出现了四个主题:1)对疫苗接种和疫苗犹豫不决的看法;2)初级保健医生在策略和资源使用上的差异;3)固执的疫苗否定者和宗教不相容:两大障碍;4)遇到疫苗犹豫不决后的负面影响:结论:马来西亚初级保健医生在遇到疫苗犹豫不决问题时会有负面经历,并对他们产生负面影响。这些经历可归因于所面临的挑战和缺乏可供参考的标准化资源。这些发现建议制定更灵活的政策、涵盖所有专业角色的培训模块以及管理疫苗犹豫不决的标准化资源库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Family Physician
Malaysian Family Physician Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Family Physician is the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. It is published three times a year. Circulation: The journal is distributed free of charge to all members of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. Complimentary copies are also sent to other organizations that are members of the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信