Meaning in Life: A Novel Factor for Promoting Wellbeing in COPD.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Caitlin Batzlaff, Madison Roy, Johanna Hoult, Roberto Benzo
{"title":"Meaning in Life: A Novel Factor for Promoting Wellbeing in COPD.","authors":"Caitlin Batzlaff, Madison Roy, Johanna Hoult, Roberto Benzo","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research evidence indicates that meaning in life (MIL) is a meaningful outcome in individuals living with chronic illness, but evidence is lacking for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that MIL is independently associated with clinically meaningful outcomes for patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed cross-sectional analysis from a large cohort with moderate-severe COPD that participated in a home pulmonary rehabilitation study. MIL was measured using the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), with domains of Presence and Search. The study included 340 participants: mean age 69 years old (standard deviation [SD] 9.4), 55.3% female, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) 44.3% (SD 19.4), and a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale of 2.69 (SD 0.84).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with high MLQ Presence (versus low score) had meaningfully better scores (beyond the minimal clinically important difference) across all Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) domains: Dyspnea, Fatigue, Emotions, and Mastery (<i>p</i>≤0.02); self-management (<i>p</i>≤0.001); social support (<i>p</i>≤0.001); anxiety (<i>p</i>≤0.001); and depression (<i>p</i>≤0.01) scores. When adjusting for age, sex, FEV<sub>1</sub>, mMRC, social support, and anxiety, MLQ Presence was independently associated with CRQ domains Fatigue, Emotions, and self-management (<i>p</i>≤0.01). MLQ Search was independently associated with CRQ Dyspnea, Fatigue, and Mastery (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with COPD, the perception that life has meaning or the willingness to search for MIL is associated with the outcomes that patients consider most important. Our results are novel as MIL is a potentially modifiable outcome that could complement person-centered conversations during clinical visits, pulmonary rehabilitation, and health coaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2023.0476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Research evidence indicates that meaning in life (MIL) is a meaningful outcome in individuals living with chronic illness, but evidence is lacking for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Objectives: We hypothesized that MIL is independently associated with clinically meaningful outcomes for patients with COPD.

Methods: We performed cross-sectional analysis from a large cohort with moderate-severe COPD that participated in a home pulmonary rehabilitation study. MIL was measured using the Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ), with domains of Presence and Search. The study included 340 participants: mean age 69 years old (standard deviation [SD] 9.4), 55.3% female, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 44.3% (SD 19.4), and a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale of 2.69 (SD 0.84).

Results: Patients with high MLQ Presence (versus low score) had meaningfully better scores (beyond the minimal clinically important difference) across all Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) domains: Dyspnea, Fatigue, Emotions, and Mastery (p≤0.02); self-management (p≤0.001); social support (p≤0.001); anxiety (p≤0.001); and depression (p≤0.01) scores. When adjusting for age, sex, FEV1, mMRC, social support, and anxiety, MLQ Presence was independently associated with CRQ domains Fatigue, Emotions, and self-management (p≤0.01). MLQ Search was independently associated with CRQ Dyspnea, Fatigue, and Mastery (p<0.05).

Conclusions: In patients with COPD, the perception that life has meaning or the willingness to search for MIL is associated with the outcomes that patients consider most important. Our results are novel as MIL is a potentially modifiable outcome that could complement person-centered conversations during clinical visits, pulmonary rehabilitation, and health coaching.

生命的意义:促进慢性阻塞性肺病患者福祉的新因素。
研究证据表明,生命意义(MIL)对慢性病患者来说是一种有意义的结果,但对于慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)来说却缺乏证据。我们假设 MIL 与慢性阻塞性肺病患者有临床意义的结果独立相关。我们对参与家庭肺康复研究的大量中重度慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了横断面分析。生活意义问卷(MLQ)包含 "存在 "和 "寻找 "两个领域。该研究包括 340 名参与者:平均年龄 69 岁/o(SD 9.4),55.3% 为女性,FEV1% 为 44.3%(SD 19.4),mMRC 呼吸困难量表为 2.69(SD 0.84)。MLQ Presence得分高的患者(与得分低的患者相比)在所有慢性呼吸问卷领域的呼吸困难、疲劳、情绪和掌握(p ≤ 0.02)、自我管理(p ≤ 0.001)、社会支持(p ≤ 0.001)、焦虑(p ≤ 0.001)和抑郁(p ≤ 0.01)得分都有显著提高(超过 MCID)。在对年龄、性别、FEV1、mMRC、社会支持和焦虑进行调整后,MLQ "存在 "与 CRQ "疲劳"、"情绪 "和 "自我管理 "领域独立相关(p ≤ 0.01)。MLQ Search 与 CRQ Dyspnea、疲劳和掌握度独立相关(p < 0.05)。在慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,对生命意义的感知或寻找 MIL 的意愿与患者认为最重要的结果相关。我们的研究结果很新颖,因为MIL是一种潜在的可改变的结果,可以在临床就诊、肺康复和健康指导过程中补充以人为本的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信