The Depth of Invasion and Level IV Cervical Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinically N0 Tongue Cancer.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Imdat Yüce, Aslıhan Oflaz Çapar, Veli Çetinaslan, Kemal Deniz, Alperen Vural, Sedat Çağlı, Serap Doğan, Mete Gündoğ
{"title":"The Depth of Invasion and Level IV Cervical Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinically N0 Tongue Cancer.","authors":"Imdat Yüce, Aslıhan Oflaz Çapar, Veli Çetinaslan, Kemal Deniz, Alperen Vural, Sedat Çağlı, Serap Doğan, Mete Gündoğ","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01647-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate indication for level IV dissection is crucial for preventing complications such as phrenic nerve damage and chylous fistulas in clinically N0 tongue cancer. Although the depth of invasion is an established independent risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis in tongue cancer, its relationship with level IV metastasis has not been evaluated. This study investigated the relationship between the depth of invasion and level IV nodal metastasis in clinically N0 tongue cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated clinical N0 patients who underwent glossectomy and level I-IV neck dissection. We examined lymph node metastasis, risk factors, and the relationship between depth of invasion and metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study included 58 patients, and no patient had isolated level IV metastasis. Additionally, there was no level IV metastasis in well-differentiated tumors. Tumor size, depth of invasion, differentiation, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with level IV neck metastasis. We found a critical tumor size of 2.5 cm and depth of invasion of 8 mm for level IV neck metastasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, we recommend that level IV dissection should be considered for poorly differentiated tumors, tumors greater than 2.5 cm in size, and those deeper than 8 mm. This study highlights the importance of depth of invasion as a prognostic factor for predicting level IV metastasis and suggests that our findings can be used to prevent unnecessary level IV dissections that may lead to complications in tongue cancer surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11087439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01647-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The accurate indication for level IV dissection is crucial for preventing complications such as phrenic nerve damage and chylous fistulas in clinically N0 tongue cancer. Although the depth of invasion is an established independent risk factor for occult lymph node metastasis in tongue cancer, its relationship with level IV metastasis has not been evaluated. This study investigated the relationship between the depth of invasion and level IV nodal metastasis in clinically N0 tongue cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated clinical N0 patients who underwent glossectomy and level I-IV neck dissection. We examined lymph node metastasis, risk factors, and the relationship between depth of invasion and metastasis.

Results: Our study included 58 patients, and no patient had isolated level IV metastasis. Additionally, there was no level IV metastasis in well-differentiated tumors. Tumor size, depth of invasion, differentiation, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with level IV neck metastasis. We found a critical tumor size of 2.5 cm and depth of invasion of 8 mm for level IV neck metastasis.

Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend that level IV dissection should be considered for poorly differentiated tumors, tumors greater than 2.5 cm in size, and those deeper than 8 mm. This study highlights the importance of depth of invasion as a prognostic factor for predicting level IV metastasis and suggests that our findings can be used to prevent unnecessary level IV dissections that may lead to complications in tongue cancer surgery.

临床表现为 N0 的舌癌患者的侵袭深度和 IV 级宫颈结节转移。
背景:准确掌握 IV 级切除术的指征对于防止临床上 N0 级舌癌患者出现膈神经损伤和乳糜瘘等并发症至关重要。虽然侵犯深度是舌癌隐匿性淋巴结转移的独立危险因素,但其与 IV 级转移的关系尚未得到评估。本研究调查了临床N0级舌癌的侵犯深度与IV级结节转移之间的关系:方法:我们回顾性研究了接受舌体切除术和 I-IV 级颈部清扫术的临床 N0 患者。我们研究了淋巴结转移、风险因素以及侵犯深度与转移之间的关系:我们的研究共纳入了 58 例患者,没有患者出现孤立的 IV 级转移。此外,在分化良好的肿瘤中也没有 IV 级转移。肿瘤大小、浸润深度、分化程度和神经周围浸润与颈部 IV 级转移显著相关。我们发现,颈部 IV 级转移的临界肿瘤大小为 2.5 厘米,浸润深度为 8 毫米:根据我们的研究结果,我们建议分化较差的肿瘤、大小超过 2.5 厘米的肿瘤和深度超过 8 毫米的肿瘤应考虑 IV 级切除。这项研究强调了侵袭深度作为预测 IV 级转移的预后因素的重要性,并认为我们的研究结果可用于防止不必要的 IV 级切除,以免在舌癌手术中导致并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信