Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder: Based on Integrated Bioinformatics and Clinical Validation.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Molecular Neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1007/s12035-024-04217-1
Xiaogang Zhong, Yue Chen, Weiyi Chen, Yiyun Liu, Siwen Gui, Juncai Pu, Dongfang Wang, Yong He, Xiang Chen, Xiaopeng Chen, Renjie Qiao, Peng Xie
{"title":"Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder: Based on Integrated Bioinformatics and Clinical Validation.","authors":"Xiaogang Zhong, Yue Chen, Weiyi Chen, Yiyun Liu, Siwen Gui, Juncai Pu, Dongfang Wang, Yong He, Xiang Chen, Xiaopeng Chen, Renjie Qiao, Peng Xie","doi":"10.1007/s12035-024-04217-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mental illness characterized by a lack of objective biomarkers. Mounting evidence suggests there are extensive transcriptional molecular changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of individuals with MDD. However, it remains unclear whether there are specific genes that are consistently altered and possess diagnostic power. In this study, we conducted a systematic search of PFC datasets of MDD patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. We calculated the differential expression of genes (DEGs) and identified robust DEGs using the RRA and MetaDE methods. Furthermore, we validated the consistently altered genes and assessed their diagnostic power through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiments in our clinical blood cohort. Additionally, we evaluated the diagnostic power of hub DEGs in independent public blood datasets. We obtained eight PFC datasets, comprising 158 MDD patients and 263 healthy controls, and identified a total of 1468 unique DEGs. Through integrated analysis, we identified 290 robustly altered DEGs. Among these, seven hub DEGs (SLC1A3, PON2, AQP1, EFEMP1, GJA1, CENPD, HSD11B1) were significantly down-regulated at the protein level in our clinical blood cohort. Moreover, these hub DEGs exhibited a negative correlation with the Hamilton Depression Scale score (P < 0.05). Furthermore, these hub DEGs formed a panel with promising diagnostic power in three independent public blood datasets (average AUCs of 0.85) and our clinical blood cohort (AUC of 0.92). The biomarker panel composed of these genes demonstrated promising diagnostic efficacy for MDD and serves as a useful tool for its diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18762,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Neurobiology","volume":" ","pages":"10355-10364"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04217-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe mental illness characterized by a lack of objective biomarkers. Mounting evidence suggests there are extensive transcriptional molecular changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of individuals with MDD. However, it remains unclear whether there are specific genes that are consistently altered and possess diagnostic power. In this study, we conducted a systematic search of PFC datasets of MDD patients from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. We calculated the differential expression of genes (DEGs) and identified robust DEGs using the RRA and MetaDE methods. Furthermore, we validated the consistently altered genes and assessed their diagnostic power through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay experiments in our clinical blood cohort. Additionally, we evaluated the diagnostic power of hub DEGs in independent public blood datasets. We obtained eight PFC datasets, comprising 158 MDD patients and 263 healthy controls, and identified a total of 1468 unique DEGs. Through integrated analysis, we identified 290 robustly altered DEGs. Among these, seven hub DEGs (SLC1A3, PON2, AQP1, EFEMP1, GJA1, CENPD, HSD11B1) were significantly down-regulated at the protein level in our clinical blood cohort. Moreover, these hub DEGs exhibited a negative correlation with the Hamilton Depression Scale score (P < 0.05). Furthermore, these hub DEGs formed a panel with promising diagnostic power in three independent public blood datasets (average AUCs of 0.85) and our clinical blood cohort (AUC of 0.92). The biomarker panel composed of these genes demonstrated promising diagnostic efficacy for MDD and serves as a useful tool for its diagnosis.

Abstract Image

鉴定重度抑郁障碍的潜在生物标记物:基于综合生物信息学和临床验证。
重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是一种严重的精神疾病,其特点是缺乏客观的生物标志物。越来越多的证据表明,MDD 患者的前额叶皮层(PFC)存在广泛的转录分子变化。然而,是否存在持续改变并具有诊断能力的特定基因仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们从基因表达总库(Gene Expression Omnibus)数据库中对 MDD 患者的前额叶皮层数据集进行了系统搜索。我们计算了基因的差异表达(DEGs),并使用 RRA 和 MetaDE 方法鉴定了稳健的 DEGs。此外,我们还验证了持续改变的基因,并在临床血液队列中通过酶联免疫吸附试验评估了这些基因的诊断能力。此外,我们还在独立的公共血液数据集中评估了枢纽 DEGs 的诊断能力。我们获得了 8 个 PFC 数据集,其中包括 158 名 MDD 患者和 263 名健康对照者,共鉴定出 1468 个独特的 DEGs。通过综合分析,我们确定了 290 个稳健改变的 DEGs。其中,7 个中枢 DEGs(SLC1A3、PON2、AQP1、EFEMP1、GJA1、CENPD、HSD11B1)在我们的临床血液队列中的蛋白水平显著下调。此外,这些枢纽 DEGs 与汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分呈负相关(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Neurobiology
Molecular Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Neurobiology is an exciting journal for neuroscientists needing to stay in close touch with progress at the forefront of molecular brain research today. It is an especially important periodical for graduate students and "postdocs," specifically designed to synthesize and critically assess research trends for all neuroscientists hoping to stay active at the cutting edge of this dramatically developing area. This journal has proven to be crucial in departmental libraries, serving as essential reading for every committed neuroscientist who is striving to keep abreast of all rapid developments in a forefront field. Most recent significant advances in experimental and clinical neuroscience have been occurring at the molecular level. Until now, there has been no journal devoted to looking closely at this fragmented literature in a critical, coherent fashion. Each submission is thoroughly analyzed by scientists and clinicians internationally renowned for their special competence in the areas treated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信