The extended impact of co-designed personalised aids for people living with chronic conditions: an exploratory study in a healthcare setting.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Jonathan Howard, Zoe Fisher, Lorna H Tasker, Jeremy Tree
{"title":"The extended impact of co-designed personalised aids for people living with chronic conditions: an exploratory study in a healthcare setting.","authors":"Jonathan Howard, Zoe Fisher, Lorna H Tasker, Jeremy Tree","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2341844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assistive technology has great potential to help individuals living with chronic health conditions, however devices often fail to align with the unique requirements of users. These results in device abandonment and missed opportunities to benefit people. This exploratory study aims to evaluate the short and longer-term satisfaction, psychological benefit, use and resources involved in co-designed customised assistive devices within a current healthcare service. Individuals with chronic health conditions identified daily living challenges. Eleven individuals completed the trial and were involved throughout the design process. Outcome measures evaluated the impact of the devices provided, healthcare utilisation, help required, and resources used. Nineteen custom assistive devices were produced for twenty-four challenges in daily living identified. At 3-months, eighteen devices were still being used. Daily challenges had become easier for individuals to complete and required less help from informal carers. Individuals were satisfied with the devices and service provided. Improvements in competence, adaptability and self-esteem were sustained long-term. The average clinician's time required to produce a device was 5 h 55 min, with an average cost of £203.79. People with chronic conditions were able to benefit from the co-design process resulting in satisfaction and long-term utilisation of the device, and positive psycho-social benefits. The costs associated with embedding this approach in a healthcare service were calculated. Scaling up the co-design process reduced the associated costs per device compared to previous work. Further work is required to evaluate co-designing across larger samples and explore opportunities to further improve the cost-efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"3050-3062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2341844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assistive technology has great potential to help individuals living with chronic health conditions, however devices often fail to align with the unique requirements of users. These results in device abandonment and missed opportunities to benefit people. This exploratory study aims to evaluate the short and longer-term satisfaction, psychological benefit, use and resources involved in co-designed customised assistive devices within a current healthcare service. Individuals with chronic health conditions identified daily living challenges. Eleven individuals completed the trial and were involved throughout the design process. Outcome measures evaluated the impact of the devices provided, healthcare utilisation, help required, and resources used. Nineteen custom assistive devices were produced for twenty-four challenges in daily living identified. At 3-months, eighteen devices were still being used. Daily challenges had become easier for individuals to complete and required less help from informal carers. Individuals were satisfied with the devices and service provided. Improvements in competence, adaptability and self-esteem were sustained long-term. The average clinician's time required to produce a device was 5 h 55 min, with an average cost of £203.79. People with chronic conditions were able to benefit from the co-design process resulting in satisfaction and long-term utilisation of the device, and positive psycho-social benefits. The costs associated with embedding this approach in a healthcare service were calculated. Scaling up the co-design process reduced the associated costs per device compared to previous work. Further work is required to evaluate co-designing across larger samples and explore opportunities to further improve the cost-efficiency.

共同设计的个性化辅助工具对慢性病患者的扩展影响:一项在医疗机构开展的探索性研究。
辅助技术在帮助慢性病患者方面具有巨大潜力,但设备往往无法满足用户的独特需求。这就导致了设备的废弃,错失了造福人类的机会。这项探索性研究旨在评估当前医疗保健服务中共同设计的定制辅助设备的短期和长期满意度、心理益处、使用情况和涉及的资源。患有慢性疾病的个人确定了日常生活中的挑战。11 人完成了试验,并参与了整个设计过程。结果测量评估了所提供设备的影响、医疗保健利用率、所需帮助和所用资源。针对确定的 24 项日常生活挑战,共生产了 19 种定制辅助设备。3 个月后,有 18 个设备仍在使用。对个人而言,完成日常挑战变得更加容易,需要非正式护理人员提供的帮助也更少。个人对所提供的设备和服务感到满意。能力、适应性和自尊方面的改善得以长期保持。临床医生制作一个装置所需的平均时间为 5 小时 55 分钟,平均成本为 203.79 英镑。慢性病患者能够从共同设计过程中获益,从而对设备感到满意并长期使用,同时获得积极的社会心理益处。我们还计算了在医疗服务中采用这种方法的相关成本。与之前的工作相比,扩大协同设计过程降低了每个设备的相关成本。我们还需要进一步开展工作,在更大的样本范围内对共同设计进行评估,并探索进一步提高成本效益的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信