Homeopathy as Praxis: Integration of Homeopathy as Supportive Care into Daily Life in Early Breast Cancer Patients.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Clair-Antoine Veyrier, Guillaume Roucoux, Laurence Baumann-Coblentz, Jacques Massol, Jean-Claude Karp, Jean-Philippe Wagner, Olivier Chassany, Martin Duracinsky
{"title":"Homeopathy as Praxis: Integration of Homeopathy as Supportive Care into Daily Life in Early Breast Cancer Patients.","authors":"Clair-Antoine Veyrier, Guillaume Roucoux, Laurence Baumann-Coblentz, Jacques Massol, Jean-Claude Karp, Jean-Philippe Wagner, Olivier Chassany, Martin Duracinsky","doi":"10.1177/15347354241233302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Homeopathy is one of most widely used non-conventional supportive care methods used by women with breast cancer. This article aims to describe the routines and practices related to homeopathy as supportive care used by women with non-metastatic breast cancer in France.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used Grounded Theory. Participants were women with early breast cancer and healthcare professionals (General Practitioner homeopaths & oncologists). Inclusion depended on specific criteria and the aim of theoretical sampling until data saturation. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups following evolving topic guides. Transcribed interviews underwent in-depth thematic analysis. Inclusion, interviewing, transcription and coding occurred iteratively. Data was reported according to COREQ guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The therapeutic agency of homeopathy was distributed to different actors and ritualized material activities highly involving the patient. The choice of remedy was mostly delegated by patients to General Practitioner homeopaths (GPH) during consultations. Individualization, that is to say adaptation to the patient, differed from other modes of access to homeopathy (self-medication and oncologists). Self-medication was mostly limited to known products in a limited time frame. However, we identified a supported self-medication using trusted homeopathic protocols. Following homeopathic prescriptions involves a high level of commitment on behalf of the patient and follows different rules for homeopathy intake. This knowledge was either acquired earlier for users or discovered along breast cancer treatment for non-users. Taking homeopathy involved small daily actions for intake of different products at different times of the day. New users used strategies to ease the integration of homeopathy into their daily life. The stance toward such rules differed among patients. Some followed rules to optimize their effects while others simplified the rules and took those rituals as part of homeopathy benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Homeopathy as supportive care in breast cancer is distributed toward different actors and ritualized activities. Homeopathy is a supported practice where GPH played a role in the prescription. Health Literacy in homeopathy played a role to ease its integration into daily life and identify the potential benefits. The high involvement of patients in their homeopathic treatment is a form of treatment reappropriation and empowerment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13734,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","volume":"23 ","pages":"15347354241233302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11084993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Cancer Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347354241233302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Homeopathy is one of most widely used non-conventional supportive care methods used by women with breast cancer. This article aims to describe the routines and practices related to homeopathy as supportive care used by women with non-metastatic breast cancer in France.

Methods: This qualitative study used Grounded Theory. Participants were women with early breast cancer and healthcare professionals (General Practitioner homeopaths & oncologists). Inclusion depended on specific criteria and the aim of theoretical sampling until data saturation. Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups following evolving topic guides. Transcribed interviews underwent in-depth thematic analysis. Inclusion, interviewing, transcription and coding occurred iteratively. Data was reported according to COREQ guidelines.

Results: The therapeutic agency of homeopathy was distributed to different actors and ritualized material activities highly involving the patient. The choice of remedy was mostly delegated by patients to General Practitioner homeopaths (GPH) during consultations. Individualization, that is to say adaptation to the patient, differed from other modes of access to homeopathy (self-medication and oncologists). Self-medication was mostly limited to known products in a limited time frame. However, we identified a supported self-medication using trusted homeopathic protocols. Following homeopathic prescriptions involves a high level of commitment on behalf of the patient and follows different rules for homeopathy intake. This knowledge was either acquired earlier for users or discovered along breast cancer treatment for non-users. Taking homeopathy involved small daily actions for intake of different products at different times of the day. New users used strategies to ease the integration of homeopathy into their daily life. The stance toward such rules differed among patients. Some followed rules to optimize their effects while others simplified the rules and took those rituals as part of homeopathy benefits.

Conclusion: Homeopathy as supportive care in breast cancer is distributed toward different actors and ritualized activities. Homeopathy is a supported practice where GPH played a role in the prescription. Health Literacy in homeopathy played a role to ease its integration into daily life and identify the potential benefits. The high involvement of patients in their homeopathic treatment is a form of treatment reappropriation and empowerment.

顺势疗法作为实践:将顺势疗法作为支持性护理融入早期乳腺癌患者的日常生活。
导言:顺势疗法是乳腺癌女性患者最广泛使用的非常规辅助治疗方法之一。本文旨在描述法国非转移性乳腺癌妇女使用顺势疗法作为支持性护理的相关常规和实践:这项定性研究采用了基础理论。参与者为患有早期乳腺癌的妇女和医护人员(全科顺势疗法医师和肿瘤医师)。根据具体标准和理论取样的目的纳入研究对象,直至数据饱和。根据不断发展的主题指南,通过个人半结构化访谈和焦点小组收集数据。对转录的访谈内容进行了深入的专题分析。纳入、访谈、转录和编码是反复进行的。数据按照 COREQ 指南进行报告:顺势疗法的治疗机构被分配给了不同的参与者,仪式化的物质活动让患者高度参与其中。在咨询过程中,患者大多委托全科顺势疗法医生(GPH)选择药物。个性化,即根据病人的情况进行调整,与其他顺势疗法的使用方式(自我药疗和肿瘤专家)有所不同。自我药疗大多仅限于在有限的时间内使用已知产品。不过,我们发现有一种使用可信顺势疗法方案的自我药疗得到了支持。遵从顺势疗法处方需要患者做出高度承诺,并遵循不同的顺势疗法摄入规则。对于使用顺势疗法的患者来说,这些知识是在早期获得的,而对于未使用顺势疗法的患者来说,这些知识则是在乳腺癌治疗过程中发现的。服用顺势疗法涉及每天在不同时间服用不同产品的小行动。新使用者会采取一些策略,使顺势疗法更容易融入他们的日常生活。患者对这些规则的态度各不相同。有些人遵守规则以优化疗效,有些人则简化了规则,并将这些仪式视为顺势疗法益处的一部分:结论:顺势疗法作为乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗手段,其参与者和仪式化活动各不相同。顺势疗法是一种支持性实践,GPH 在处方中发挥了作用。顺势疗法中的健康知识在促进其融入日常生活和识别潜在益处方面发挥了作用。患者对顺势疗法治疗的高度参与是一种治疗再利用和赋权的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrative Cancer Therapies
Integrative Cancer Therapies 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ICT is the first journal to spearhead and focus on a new and growing movement in cancer treatment. The journal emphasizes scientific understanding of alternative medicine and traditional medicine therapies, and their responsible integration with conventional health care. Integrative care includes therapeutic interventions in diet, lifestyle, exercise, stress care, and nutritional supplements, as well as experimental vaccines, chrono-chemotherapy, and other advanced treatments. Contributors are leading oncologists, researchers, nurses, and health-care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信