Predicting Mortality Before Interhospital Hospital for "Unseen" General Surgery Patients: Development, Validation, and Feasibility Trial of a Mortality Risk Calculator.
Sayf Al-Deen Said, Corey K Gentle, Abby Gross, Kelly Nimylowycz, Mir Shanaz Hossain, Allison Weathers, R Matthew Walsh, Scott R Steele, Miguel Regueiro, Toms Augustin
{"title":"Predicting Mortality Before Interhospital Hospital for \"Unseen\" General Surgery Patients: Development, Validation, and Feasibility Trial of a Mortality Risk Calculator.","authors":"Sayf Al-Deen Said, Corey K Gentle, Abby Gross, Kelly Nimylowycz, Mir Shanaz Hossain, Allison Weathers, R Matthew Walsh, Scott R Steele, Miguel Regueiro, Toms Augustin","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and validate a mortality risk calculator that could be utilized at the time of transfer, leveraging routinely collected variables that could be obtained by trained nonclinical transfer personnel.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no objective tools to predict mortality at the time of interhospital transfer for Emergency General Surgery patients that are \"unseen\" by the accepting system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients transferred to general or colorectal surgery services from January 2016 to August 2022 were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (3:1 ratio). The primary outcome was admission-related mortality, defined as death during the index admission or within 30 days postdischarge. Multiple predictive models were developed and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4664 transferred patients, 280 (6.0%) experienced mortality. Predictive models were generated utilizing 19 routinely collected variables; the penalized regression model was selected over other models due to excellent performance using only 12 variables. The model performance on the validating set resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of 0.851, 0.90, 0.67, and 0.79, respectively. After bias correction, the Brier score was 0.04, indicating a strong association between the assigned risk and the observed frequency of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A risk calculator using 12 variables has excellent predictive ability for mortality at the time of interhospital transfer among \"unseen\" Emergency General Surgery patients. Quantifying a patient's mortality risk at the time of transfer could improve patient triage, bed and resource allocation, and standardize care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"267-274"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Develop and validate a mortality risk calculator that could be utilized at the time of transfer, leveraging routinely collected variables that could be obtained by trained nonclinical transfer personnel.
Background: There are no objective tools to predict mortality at the time of interhospital transfer for Emergency General Surgery patients that are "unseen" by the accepting system.
Methods: Patients transferred to general or colorectal surgery services from January 2016 to August 2022 were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (3:1 ratio). The primary outcome was admission-related mortality, defined as death during the index admission or within 30 days postdischarge. Multiple predictive models were developed and validated.
Results: Among 4664 transferred patients, 280 (6.0%) experienced mortality. Predictive models were generated utilizing 19 routinely collected variables; the penalized regression model was selected over other models due to excellent performance using only 12 variables. The model performance on the validating set resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of 0.851, 0.90, 0.67, and 0.79, respectively. After bias correction, the Brier score was 0.04, indicating a strong association between the assigned risk and the observed frequency of mortality.
Conclusions: A risk calculator using 12 variables has excellent predictive ability for mortality at the time of interhospital transfer among "unseen" Emergency General Surgery patients. Quantifying a patient's mortality risk at the time of transfer could improve patient triage, bed and resource allocation, and standardize care.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.