Predicting Mortality Before Interhospital Hospital for "Unseen" General Surgery Patients: Development, Validation, and Feasibility Trial of a Mortality Risk Calculator.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006334
Sayf Al-Deen Said, Corey K Gentle, Abby Gross, Kelly Nimylowycz, Mir Shanaz Hossain, Allison Weathers, R Matthew Walsh, Scott R Steele, Miguel Regueiro, Toms Augustin
{"title":"Predicting Mortality Before Interhospital Hospital for \"Unseen\" General Surgery Patients: Development, Validation, and Feasibility Trial of a Mortality Risk Calculator.","authors":"Sayf Al-Deen Said, Corey K Gentle, Abby Gross, Kelly Nimylowycz, Mir Shanaz Hossain, Allison Weathers, R Matthew Walsh, Scott R Steele, Miguel Regueiro, Toms Augustin","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop and validate a mortality risk calculator that could be utilized at the time of transfer, leveraging routinely collected variables that could be obtained by trained nonclinical transfer personnel.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no objective tools to predict mortality at the time of interhospital transfer for Emergency General Surgery patients that are \"unseen\" by the accepting system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients transferred to general or colorectal surgery services from January 2016 to August 2022 were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (3:1 ratio). The primary outcome was admission-related mortality, defined as death during the index admission or within 30 days postdischarge. Multiple predictive models were developed and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4664 transferred patients, 280 (6.0%) experienced mortality. Predictive models were generated utilizing 19 routinely collected variables; the penalized regression model was selected over other models due to excellent performance using only 12 variables. The model performance on the validating set resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of 0.851, 0.90, 0.67, and 0.79, respectively. After bias correction, the Brier score was 0.04, indicating a strong association between the assigned risk and the observed frequency of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A risk calculator using 12 variables has excellent predictive ability for mortality at the time of interhospital transfer among \"unseen\" Emergency General Surgery patients. Quantifying a patient's mortality risk at the time of transfer could improve patient triage, bed and resource allocation, and standardize care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"267-274"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Develop and validate a mortality risk calculator that could be utilized at the time of transfer, leveraging routinely collected variables that could be obtained by trained nonclinical transfer personnel.

Background: There are no objective tools to predict mortality at the time of interhospital transfer for Emergency General Surgery patients that are "unseen" by the accepting system.

Methods: Patients transferred to general or colorectal surgery services from January 2016 to August 2022 were retrospectively identified and randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (3:1 ratio). The primary outcome was admission-related mortality, defined as death during the index admission or within 30 days postdischarge. Multiple predictive models were developed and validated.

Results: Among 4664 transferred patients, 280 (6.0%) experienced mortality. Predictive models were generated utilizing 19 routinely collected variables; the penalized regression model was selected over other models due to excellent performance using only 12 variables. The model performance on the validating set resulted in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of 0.851, 0.90, 0.67, and 0.79, respectively. After bias correction, the Brier score was 0.04, indicating a strong association between the assigned risk and the observed frequency of mortality.

Conclusions: A risk calculator using 12 variables has excellent predictive ability for mortality at the time of interhospital transfer among "unseen" Emergency General Surgery patients. Quantifying a patient's mortality risk at the time of transfer could improve patient triage, bed and resource allocation, and standardize care.

预测 "未曾谋面 "的普通外科病人在院际住院前的死亡率:死亡率风险计算器的开发、验证和可行性试验。
目标:开发并验证可在转院时使用的死亡率风险计算器,利用常规收集的变量,由经过培训的非临床转院人员获取:目前还没有客观的工具来预测接受系统 "看不见 "的急诊普外科(EGS)患者在医院间转院时的死亡率:方法: 对 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间转入普外科或结直肠外科服务的患者进行回顾性识别,并随机分为训练组和验证组(比例为 3:1)。主要结果是入院相关死亡率,定义为索引入院期间或出院后 30 天内的死亡。我们开发并验证了多个预测模型:结果:在 4664 名转院患者中,280 人(6.0%)出现死亡。利用 19 个常规收集的变量生成了预测模型;由于仅使用 12 个变量就能获得出色的性能,因此选择了惩罚回归模型而非其他模型。模型在验证集上的表现使接收者工作特征曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异性和平衡准确度分别达到 0.851、0.90、0.67 和 0.79。经过偏差校正后,布赖尔评分为 0.04,表明分配的风险与观察到的死亡频率之间有很强的关联:结论:使用十二个变量的风险计算器对 "未见过 "的 EGS 患者在院间转运时的死亡率有很好的预测能力。量化患者转院时的死亡风险可以改善患者分流、床位和资源分配,并实现护理标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信