Sickle Cell Disease Has No Impact on 10-Year Cumulative Incidence and Indications for Revision Lumbar Fusion.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1177/21925682241253154
B Tanner Seibold, Abhisri Ramesh, Philip M Parel, Theodore Quan, Rachel A Ranson, Addisu Mesfin, Tushar Ch Patel
{"title":"Sickle Cell Disease Has No Impact on 10-Year Cumulative Incidence and Indications for Revision Lumbar Fusion.","authors":"B Tanner Seibold, Abhisri Ramesh, Philip M Parel, Theodore Quan, Rachel A Ranson, Addisu Mesfin, Tushar Ch Patel","doi":"10.1177/21925682241253154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesPatients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience distinct physiological challenges that may alter surgical outcomes. There has been no research establishing 10-year lumbar fusion (LF) implant survivorship rates among individuals with SCD. This study aims to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence and indications for revision LF between patients with and without SCD.MethodsA national database was queried to identify patients with and without SCD who underwent primary LF. SCD patients undergoing LF were propensity-score matched in a 1:4 ratio by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to a matched LF control. In total, 246 SCD patients were included along with 981 and 100,000 individuals in the matched and unmatched control cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence rates of revision LF. Furthermore, multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to compare indications for revisions and surgical complications between cohorts including hardware removal, drainage and evacuation, pseudoarthrosis, and mechanical failure.ResultsNo significant differences were found in the cumulative incidence of 10-year all-cause revision LF between patients in the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts (<i>P</i> > .05 for each). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts in regards to the indications for revision or surgical complications in LF (<i>P</i> > .05 for each).ConclusionsThis study indicates that SCD patients do not have increased risk for revision LF, nor any of its indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1592-1597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241253154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectivesPatients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience distinct physiological challenges that may alter surgical outcomes. There has been no research establishing 10-year lumbar fusion (LF) implant survivorship rates among individuals with SCD. This study aims to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence and indications for revision LF between patients with and without SCD.MethodsA national database was queried to identify patients with and without SCD who underwent primary LF. SCD patients undergoing LF were propensity-score matched in a 1:4 ratio by age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) to a matched LF control. In total, 246 SCD patients were included along with 981 and 100,000 individuals in the matched and unmatched control cohorts, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to determine the 10-year cumulative incidence rates of revision LF. Furthermore, multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to compare indications for revisions and surgical complications between cohorts including hardware removal, drainage and evacuation, pseudoarthrosis, and mechanical failure.ResultsNo significant differences were found in the cumulative incidence of 10-year all-cause revision LF between patients in the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts (P > .05 for each). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the SCD cohort and either of the control cohorts in regards to the indications for revision or surgical complications in LF (P > .05 for each).ConclusionsThis study indicates that SCD patients do not have increased risk for revision LF, nor any of its indications.

镰状细胞病对腰椎融合术十年累积发病率和翻修指征没有影响。
研究设计回顾性队列研究:镰状细胞病(SCD)患者面临着独特的生理挑战,可能会改变手术效果。目前还没有研究确定 SCD 患者 10 年的腰椎融合术(LF)植入存活率。本研究旨在确定 SCD 患者和非 SCD 患者的腰椎融合术 10 年累计发生率和翻修适应症:方法: 我们查询了一个国家数据库,以确定是否有 SCD 患者接受了初级 LF。根据年龄、性别和夏尔森综合症指数(CCI),接受 LF 的 SCD 患者与匹配的 LF 对照组按 1:4 的比例进行倾向得分匹配。总共纳入了 246 名 SCD 患者,以及分别为 981 人和 100,000 人的匹配对照组和非匹配对照组。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔生存分析法确定翻修 LF 的 10 年累积发病率。此外,还使用 Cox 比例危险模型进行了多变量分析,以比较各组间的翻修适应症和手术并发症,包括硬件切除、引流和排空、假关节和机械故障:结果:SCD队列患者与对照队列患者的10年全因翻修LF累积发生率无明显差异(P>0.05)。此外,SCD队列与对照队列在LF的翻修适应症或手术并发症方面也无明显差异(P > .05):本研究表明,SCD 患者接受 LF 翻修手术的风险并没有增加,其适应症也没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信