Fully automated quantitative coronary angiography versus optical coherence tomography guidance for coronary stent implantation (FLASH): Study protocol for a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yongcheol Kim MD, PhD , Hanbit Park MD , Hyuck-Jun Yoon , Jon Suh MD , Si-Hyuck Kang MD , Young-Hyo Lim MD , Duck Hyun Jang MD , Jae Hyoung Park MD , Eun-Seok Shin MD , Jang-Whan Bae MD , Jang Hoon Lee MD , Jun-Hyok Oh MD , Do-Yoon Kang MD , Jihoon Kweon MD , Min-Woo Jo MD , Duk-Woo Park MD, PhD , Young-Hak Kim MD, PhD , Jung-Min Ahn MD, PhD , The FLASH Trial Investigators
{"title":"Fully automated quantitative coronary angiography versus optical coherence tomography guidance for coronary stent implantation (FLASH): Study protocol for a randomized controlled noninferiority trial","authors":"Yongcheol Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hanbit Park MD ,&nbsp;Hyuck-Jun Yoon ,&nbsp;Jon Suh MD ,&nbsp;Si-Hyuck Kang MD ,&nbsp;Young-Hyo Lim MD ,&nbsp;Duck Hyun Jang MD ,&nbsp;Jae Hyoung Park MD ,&nbsp;Eun-Seok Shin MD ,&nbsp;Jang-Whan Bae MD ,&nbsp;Jang Hoon Lee MD ,&nbsp;Jun-Hyok Oh MD ,&nbsp;Do-Yoon Kang MD ,&nbsp;Jihoon Kweon MD ,&nbsp;Min-Woo Jo MD ,&nbsp;Duk-Woo Park MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Young-Hak Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jung-Min Ahn MD, PhD ,&nbsp;The FLASH Trial Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Artificial intelligence-based quantitative coronary angiography (AI-QCA) has been developed to provide a more objective and reproducible data about the severity of coronary artery stenosis and the dimensions of the vessel for intervention in real-time, overcoming the limitations of significant inter- and intraobserver variability, and time-consuming nature of on-site QCA, without requiring extra time and effort. Compared with the subjective nature of visually estimated conventional CAG guidance, AI-QCA guidance provides a more practical and standardized angiography-based approach. Although the advantage of intravascular imaging-guided PCI is increasingly recognized, their broader adoption is limited by clinical and economic barriers in many catheterization laboratories.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The FLASH (fully automated quantitative coronary angiography versus optical coherence tomography guidance for coronary stent implantation) trial is a randomized, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing the AI-QCA-assisted PCI strategy with optical coherence tomography-guided PCI strategy in patients with significant coronary artery disease. All operators will utilize a novel, standardized AI-QCA software and PCI protocol in the AI-QCA-assisted group. A total of 400 patients will be randomized to either group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the minimal stent area (mm<sup>2</sup>), determined by the final OCT run after completion of PCI. Clinical follow-up and cost-effectiveness evaluations are planned at 1 month and 6 months for all patients enrolled in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Enrollment of a total of 400 patients from the 13 participating centers in South Korea will be completed in February 2024. Follow-up of the last enrolled patients will be completed in August 2024, and primary results will be available by late 2024.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The FLASH is the first clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of AI-QCA-assisted PCI, and will provide the clinical evidence on AI-QCA assistance in the field of coronary intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05388357.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324001194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Artificial intelligence-based quantitative coronary angiography (AI-QCA) has been developed to provide a more objective and reproducible data about the severity of coronary artery stenosis and the dimensions of the vessel for intervention in real-time, overcoming the limitations of significant inter- and intraobserver variability, and time-consuming nature of on-site QCA, without requiring extra time and effort. Compared with the subjective nature of visually estimated conventional CAG guidance, AI-QCA guidance provides a more practical and standardized angiography-based approach. Although the advantage of intravascular imaging-guided PCI is increasingly recognized, their broader adoption is limited by clinical and economic barriers in many catheterization laboratories.

Methods

The FLASH (fully automated quantitative coronary angiography versus optical coherence tomography guidance for coronary stent implantation) trial is a randomized, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing the AI-QCA-assisted PCI strategy with optical coherence tomography-guided PCI strategy in patients with significant coronary artery disease. All operators will utilize a novel, standardized AI-QCA software and PCI protocol in the AI-QCA-assisted group. A total of 400 patients will be randomized to either group at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the minimal stent area (mm2), determined by the final OCT run after completion of PCI. Clinical follow-up and cost-effectiveness evaluations are planned at 1 month and 6 months for all patients enrolled in the study.

Results

Enrollment of a total of 400 patients from the 13 participating centers in South Korea will be completed in February 2024. Follow-up of the last enrolled patients will be completed in August 2024, and primary results will be available by late 2024.

Conclusion

The FLASH is the first clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of AI-QCA-assisted PCI, and will provide the clinical evidence on AI-QCA assistance in the field of coronary intervention.

Clinical trial registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT05388357.

Abstract Image

全自动定量冠状动脉造影与光学相干断层扫描引导冠状动脉支架植入术 (FLASH):随机对照非劣效试验研究方案》。
背景:基于人工智能的定量冠状动脉造影术(AI-QCA)可实时提供有关冠状动脉狭窄严重程度和需要介入治疗的血管尺寸的更客观和可重复的数据,克服了观察者之间和观察者内部的显著差异以及现场定量冠状动脉造影术耗时长的局限性,且无需花费额外的时间和精力。与目测传统 CAG 引导的主观性相比,AI-QCA 引导提供了一种更实用、更标准化的基于血管造影的方法。虽然血管内成像引导 PCI 的优势日益得到认可,但在许多导管室中,其广泛应用受到临床和经济障碍的限制:FLASH(全自动定量冠状动脉造影术与光学相干断层扫描引导冠状动脉支架植入术)试验是一项由研究者发起的随机、多中心、开放标签、非劣效性试验,在重大冠状动脉疾病患者中比较 AI-QCA 辅助 PCI 策略与光学相干断层扫描引导 PCI 策略。在 AI-QCA 辅助组中,所有操作者都将使用新颖的标准化 AI-QCA 软件和 PCI 方案。共有 400 名患者将按 1:1 的比例随机分配到其中一组。主要终点是最小支架面积(mm2),由完成 PCI 后的最终 OCT 运行确定。计划在 1 个月和 6 个月时对所有参加研究的患者进行临床随访和成本效益评估:韩国 13 个参与中心共 400 名患者的入组工作将于 2024 年 2 月完成。最后一批入组患者的随访将于 2024 年 8 月完成,主要结果将于 2024 年底公布:FLASH是首个评估AI-QCA辅助PCI可行性的临床试验,将为冠状动脉介入领域提供AI-QCA辅助的临床证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信