A social–ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ambio Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s13280-024-02031-6
Zheyi Xia, Jiasi Huang, Yuwen Huang, Kui Liu, Runmiao Zhu, Zhen Shen, Chengcheng Yuan, Liming Liu
{"title":"A social–ecological approach for identifying and mapping ecosystem service trade-offs and conservation priorities in peri-urban areas","authors":"Zheyi Xia,&nbsp;Jiasi Huang,&nbsp;Yuwen Huang,&nbsp;Kui Liu,&nbsp;Runmiao Zhu,&nbsp;Zhen Shen,&nbsp;Chengcheng Yuan,&nbsp;Liming Liu","doi":"10.1007/s13280-024-02031-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Considering both ecological and social dimensions in the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) can facilitate acceptable and inclusive management strategies, especially in peri-urban areas characterized by intricate human–ecosystem interactions. A limited body of research, however, has mapped the plural values of ESs and their different types of trade-offs in such areas. This research aimed to execute an interdisciplinary analysis of the biophysical and social values of ESs in peri-urban Shanghai, China, through a social–ecological approach that integrates spatial biophysical assessment with participatory mapping. Trade-off analysis in both ES types and ES valuations were then conducted, and multicriteria decision-making was applied for conservation. Our results reveal that trade-off intensities were lower within the social values compared to the biophysical values. Within both value dimensions, relatively stronger trade-offs were found between food production and other ESs. Areas with both high biophysical and social values were infrequently observed across ESs. Based on the characteristics of diverse values, our study identified priority conservation areas and provided management implications. We argue that adopting the integrated social–ecological perspective in sustainable environmental management contributes to the realization of harmonious coexistence between people and nature in peri-urban areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambio","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-024-02031-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering both ecological and social dimensions in the assessment of ecosystem services (ESs) can facilitate acceptable and inclusive management strategies, especially in peri-urban areas characterized by intricate human–ecosystem interactions. A limited body of research, however, has mapped the plural values of ESs and their different types of trade-offs in such areas. This research aimed to execute an interdisciplinary analysis of the biophysical and social values of ESs in peri-urban Shanghai, China, through a social–ecological approach that integrates spatial biophysical assessment with participatory mapping. Trade-off analysis in both ES types and ES valuations were then conducted, and multicriteria decision-making was applied for conservation. Our results reveal that trade-off intensities were lower within the social values compared to the biophysical values. Within both value dimensions, relatively stronger trade-offs were found between food production and other ESs. Areas with both high biophysical and social values were infrequently observed across ESs. Based on the characteristics of diverse values, our study identified priority conservation areas and provided management implications. We argue that adopting the integrated social–ecological perspective in sustainable environmental management contributes to the realization of harmonious coexistence between people and nature in peri-urban areas.

Abstract Image

采用社会生态学方法确定并绘制城郊地区生态系统服务权衡和保护优先事项图。
在评估生态系统服务(ESs)时同时考虑生态和社会因素可促进制定可接受的包容性管理策略,尤其是在以错综复杂的人类-生态系统相互作用为特征的城郊地区。然而,对此类地区生态系统服务的多元价值及其不同类型的权衡进行的研究十分有限。本研究旨在通过将空间生物物理评估与参与式制图相结合的社会生态方法,对中国上海近郊区的生态系统服务的生物物理和社会价值进行跨学科分析。然后,对生态系统类型和生态系统价值进行权衡分析,并应用多标准决策进行保护。结果表明,与生物物理价值相比,社会价值的权衡强度较低。在这两个价值维度中,粮食生产和其他环境服务之间的权衡相对较强。同时具有高生物物理价值和高社会价值的地区在各种环境服务中并不多见。根据不同价值的特点,我们的研究确定了优先保护区域,并提供了管理启示。我们认为,在可持续环境管理中采用社会生态综合视角有助于实现城郊地区人与自然的和谐共处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ambio
Ambio 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Explores the link between anthropogenic activities and the environment, Ambio encourages multi- or interdisciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. Ambio addresses the scientific, social, economic, and cultural factors that influence the condition of the human environment. Ambio particularly encourages multi- or inter-disciplinary submissions with explicit management or policy recommendations. For more than 45 years Ambio has brought international perspective to important developments in environmental research, policy and related activities for an international readership of specialists, generalists, students, decision-makers and interested laymen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信