Identifying factors that influence the selection of a postgraduate year 2 ambulatory care residency program

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Alexandra K. Statczar Pharm.D., Christine A. Schumacher Pharm.D., FCCP, Jill S. Borchert Pharm.D., FCCP, Ana C. Quiñones-Boex Ph.D.
{"title":"Identifying factors that influence the selection of a postgraduate year 2 ambulatory care residency program","authors":"Alexandra K. Statczar Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christine A. Schumacher Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Jill S. Borchert Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Ana C. Quiñones-Boex Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Studies have been conducted to evaluate motivating factors for pharmacy students in pursuing a postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residency program. Currently, no literature assesses the factors driving the selection of a specific PGY2 ambulatory care (AC) pharmacy program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The primary objective of this study was to identify factors driving the selection of a specific PGY2 AC pharmacy residency program. Secondary objectives were to describe whether these driving factors have changed throughout the residency year, the impact of remote work in the selection of a PGY2 AC program, and the impact of resident well-being in the selection of a PGY2 AC program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A questionnaire was electronically distributed to 199 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists residency program directors (RPDs) of PGY2 AC programs in March 2023. The RPDs were asked to forward the questionnaire and reminder emails to their current PGY2 AC residents. The questionnaire included a combination of categorical, Likert-type, open-ended, and demographic questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 72 PGY2 AC residents responded, providing a response rate of 27%. The mean age was 26 (±1.30) years, 69% identified as female, and 57% practiced in an urban setting. The top three factors that influenced the selection prior to the ASHP Match were culture of the program, perceived positive resident morale, and mentorship provided by RPD and preceptors. These factors remained the most influential after being in residency for approximately 8–9 months. The ability to work from home or remotely, complete a teaching certificate program, and conduct telehealth visits were the least influential factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An understanding of the factors that were most influential in the selection of a PGY2 AC program provides a unique resource to RPDs, allowing them to better position their program for future candidates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 5","pages":"452-457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.1946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Studies have been conducted to evaluate motivating factors for pharmacy students in pursuing a postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residency program. Currently, no literature assesses the factors driving the selection of a specific PGY2 ambulatory care (AC) pharmacy program.

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to identify factors driving the selection of a specific PGY2 AC pharmacy residency program. Secondary objectives were to describe whether these driving factors have changed throughout the residency year, the impact of remote work in the selection of a PGY2 AC program, and the impact of resident well-being in the selection of a PGY2 AC program.

Methods

A questionnaire was electronically distributed to 199 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists residency program directors (RPDs) of PGY2 AC programs in March 2023. The RPDs were asked to forward the questionnaire and reminder emails to their current PGY2 AC residents. The questionnaire included a combination of categorical, Likert-type, open-ended, and demographic questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.

Results

In total, 72 PGY2 AC residents responded, providing a response rate of 27%. The mean age was 26 (±1.30) years, 69% identified as female, and 57% practiced in an urban setting. The top three factors that influenced the selection prior to the ASHP Match were culture of the program, perceived positive resident morale, and mentorship provided by RPD and preceptors. These factors remained the most influential after being in residency for approximately 8–9 months. The ability to work from home or remotely, complete a teaching certificate program, and conduct telehealth visits were the least influential factors.

Conclusion

An understanding of the factors that were most influential in the selection of a PGY2 AC program provides a unique resource to RPDs, allowing them to better position their program for future candidates.

确定影响选择研究生第二年非住院护理实习课程的因素
导言:已有研究评估了促使药剂学学生选择研究生一年级(PGY1)住院医师培训项目的因素。目前,还没有文献对选择特定 PGY2 非住院护理(AC)药学课程的驱动因素进行评估。 目标 本研究的首要目标是确定选择特定 PGY2 非住院护理药学住院实习项目的驱动因素。次要目标是描述这些驱动因素在整个住院医师培训年中是否发生了变化、远程工作对选择 PGY2 交流项目的影响以及住院医师福利对选择 PGY2 交流项目的影响。 方法 2023 年 3 月,向 199 位美国卫生系统药剂师协会 PGY2 交流项目的住院医师项目主任(RPDs)发放了电子问卷。要求住院医师项目主任将问卷和提醒邮件转发给他们目前的 PGY2 AC 住院医师。问卷包括分类问题、李克特问题、开放式问题和人口统计学问题。问卷结果采用描述性统计方法进行分析。 结果 共有 72 名住院医师回复了问卷,回复率为 27%。平均年龄为 26 (±1.30) 岁,69% 为女性,57% 在城市地区执业。在参加 ASHP Match 之前,影响选择的前三个因素是项目文化、住院医师积极的士气以及住院医师培训部和戒酒师提供的指导。在住院医师实习大约 8-9 个月后,这些因素仍然是影响最大的因素。在家工作或远程工作的能力、完成教学证书课程以及进行远程医疗访问是影响最小的因素。 结论 了解对选择 PGY2 交流项目影响最大的因素为住院医师提供了独特的资源,使他们能够为未来的候选人更好地定位自己的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信