Differences and Advantages of Particles versus Liquid Material for Preoperative Intracranial Tumor Embolization: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0083
Yu Iida, Taisuke Akimoto, Shigeta Miyake, Ryosuke Suzuki, Wataru Shimohigoshi, Satoshi Hori, Jun Suenaga, Yasunobu Nakai, Katsumi Sakata, Tetsuya Yamamoto
{"title":"Differences and Advantages of Particles versus Liquid Material for Preoperative Intracranial Tumor Embolization: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.","authors":"Yu Iida, Taisuke Akimoto, Shigeta Miyake, Ryosuke Suzuki, Wataru Shimohigoshi, Satoshi Hori, Jun Suenaga, Yasunobu Nakai, Katsumi Sakata, Tetsuya Yamamoto","doi":"10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The superiority and usefulness of liquid material over particles for embolization have been a topic of debate due to differences in materials and techniques. This study aimed to identify the complications and outcomes associated with both embolization materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 93 patients from an endovascular treatment registry, treated from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2022. It included patients who underwent preoperative embolization for meningioma, solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma, and hemangioblastoma. Data for patient characteristics, procedural factors, complications, and outcomes were collected from medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A tortuous access route was the only factor independently associated with complications (<i>p</i> = 0.020). Although liquid material was more frequently used for embolization in relatively high-risk conditions, complication rates did not differ significantly between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.999). In the liquid material group, the tip of the microcatheter could be guided closer to the tumor (<i>p</i> <0.001) using a distal access catheter and flow-guide microcatheters. The subgroup middle meningeal artery embolization had less operative bleeding in the liquid material group (<i>p</i> <0.001), whereas the particles group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss than the liquid material group (<i>p</i> = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vascular tortuosity of the access route was only associated with complications in preoperative tumor embolization. Liquid material and particles showed no difference in complication rates. The use of particles in embolization may reduce intraoperative bleeding, but not in all cases can it be used safely. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the characteristics of both approaches and their relative advantages in clinical practice is essential to opt for the appropriate material according to the case.</p>","PeriodicalId":73856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","volume":"18 4","pages":"110-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neuroendovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.oa.2023-0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The superiority and usefulness of liquid material over particles for embolization have been a topic of debate due to differences in materials and techniques. This study aimed to identify the complications and outcomes associated with both embolization materials.

Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 93 patients from an endovascular treatment registry, treated from January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2022. It included patients who underwent preoperative embolization for meningioma, solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma, and hemangioblastoma. Data for patient characteristics, procedural factors, complications, and outcomes were collected from medical records.

Results: A tortuous access route was the only factor independently associated with complications (p = 0.020). Although liquid material was more frequently used for embolization in relatively high-risk conditions, complication rates did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.999). In the liquid material group, the tip of the microcatheter could be guided closer to the tumor (p <0.001) using a distal access catheter and flow-guide microcatheters. The subgroup middle meningeal artery embolization had less operative bleeding in the liquid material group (p <0.001), whereas the particles group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss than the liquid material group (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: The vascular tortuosity of the access route was only associated with complications in preoperative tumor embolization. Liquid material and particles showed no difference in complication rates. The use of particles in embolization may reduce intraoperative bleeding, but not in all cases can it be used safely. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the characteristics of both approaches and their relative advantages in clinical practice is essential to opt for the appropriate material according to the case.

用于术前颅内肿瘤栓塞的颗粒与液体材料的差异和优势:一项回顾性多中心研究。
目的:由于栓塞材料和技术的不同,液体栓塞材料比颗粒栓塞材料更优越、更有用一直是一个争论的话题。本研究旨在确定两种栓塞材料的相关并发症和结果:这项回顾性多中心队列研究纳入了血管内治疗登记处的 93 名患者,治疗时间为 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日。其中包括因脑膜瘤、单发纤维瘤/血管瘤和血管母细胞瘤接受术前栓塞治疗的患者。从病历中收集了患者特征、手术因素、并发症和结果等数据:迂曲的入路是唯一与并发症独立相关的因素(p = 0.020)。虽然在相对高风险的情况下,液体材料更常用于栓塞,但两组的并发症发生率并无显著差异(p = 0.999)。在液体材料组中,微导管的顶端可以更靠近肿瘤(p p = 0.006):结论:在术前肿瘤栓塞中,入路血管迂曲只与并发症有关。液体材料和微粒在并发症发生率上没有差异。在栓塞术中使用微粒可减少术中出血,但并非在所有情况下都能安全使用。因此,透彻了解这两种方法的特点及其在临床实践中的相对优势对于根据病例选择合适的材料至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信