Rehabilitation of back pain in the pediatric population: a mixed studies systematic review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Hainan Yu, Danielle Southerst, Jessica J Wong, Leslie Verville, Gaelan Connell, Lauren Ead, Silvano Mior, Lise Hestbaek, Michael Swain, Ginny Brunton, Heather M Shearer, Efrosini Papaconstantinou, Daphne To, Darrin Germann, Katie Pohlman, Christine Cedraschi, Carol Cancelliere
{"title":"Rehabilitation of back pain in the pediatric population: a mixed studies systematic review.","authors":"Hainan Yu, Danielle Southerst, Jessica J Wong, Leslie Verville, Gaelan Connell, Lauren Ead, Silvano Mior, Lise Hestbaek, Michael Swain, Ginny Brunton, Heather M Shearer, Efrosini Papaconstantinou, Daphne To, Darrin Germann, Katie Pohlman, Christine Cedraschi, Carol Cancelliere","doi":"10.1186/s12998-024-00538-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of children and adolescents experience back pain. However, a comprehensive systematic review on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate benefits and harms of rehabilitation interventions for non-specific low back pain (LBP) or thoracic spine pain in the pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven bibliographic electronic databases were searched from inception to June 16, 2023. Moreover, reference lists of relevant studies and systematic reviews, three targeted websites, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched. Paired reviewers independently conducted screening, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results. Certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 8461 citations and 307 full-text articles. Ten quantitative studies (i.e., 8 RCTs, 2 non-randomized clinical trials) and one qualitative study were included. With very low to moderate certainty evidence, in adolescents with LBP, spinal manipulation (1-2 sessions/week over 12 weeks, 1 RCT) plus exercise may be associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing clinically important pain reduction versus exercise alone; and group-based exercise over 8 weeks (2 RCTs and 1 non-randomized trial) may reduce pain intensity. The qualitative study found information provided via education/advice and compliance of treatment were related to effective treatment. No economic studies or studies examining thoracic spine pain were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spinal manipulation and group-based exercise may be beneficial in reducing LBP intensity in adolescents. Education should be provided as part of a care program. The overall evidence is sparse. Methodologically rigorous studies are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42019135009 (PROSPERO).</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11080233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-024-00538-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of children and adolescents experience back pain. However, a comprehensive systematic review on the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions is lacking.

Objectives: To evaluate benefits and harms of rehabilitation interventions for non-specific low back pain (LBP) or thoracic spine pain in the pediatric population.

Methods: Seven bibliographic electronic databases were searched from inception to June 16, 2023. Moreover, reference lists of relevant studies and systematic reviews, three targeted websites, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched. Paired reviewers independently conducted screening, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, subjects, and results. Certainty of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE approach.

Results: We screened 8461 citations and 307 full-text articles. Ten quantitative studies (i.e., 8 RCTs, 2 non-randomized clinical trials) and one qualitative study were included. With very low to moderate certainty evidence, in adolescents with LBP, spinal manipulation (1-2 sessions/week over 12 weeks, 1 RCT) plus exercise may be associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing clinically important pain reduction versus exercise alone; and group-based exercise over 8 weeks (2 RCTs and 1 non-randomized trial) may reduce pain intensity. The qualitative study found information provided via education/advice and compliance of treatment were related to effective treatment. No economic studies or studies examining thoracic spine pain were identified.

Conclusions: Spinal manipulation and group-based exercise may be beneficial in reducing LBP intensity in adolescents. Education should be provided as part of a care program. The overall evidence is sparse. Methodologically rigorous studies are needed.

Trial registration: CRD42019135009 (PROSPERO).

儿童背痛康复:混合研究系统综述。
背景:很大一部分儿童和青少年都有背痛的经历。然而,目前尚缺乏对康复干预措施有效性的全面系统回顾:评估康复干预对儿童非特异性腰背痛或胸椎痛的益处和危害:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 6 月 16 日的七个文献电子数据库。此外,还检索了相关研究和系统综述的参考文献列表、三个目标网站以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。配对审稿人独立进行筛选,评估偏倚风险,并提取与研究特点、方法、受试者和结果相关的数据。根据 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行评估:我们筛选了 8461 条引文和 307 篇全文文章。其中包括 10 项定量研究(即 8 项研究性临床试验和 2 项非随机临床试验)和 1 项定性研究。根据极低至中等程度的确定性证据,对于患有腰椎间盘突出症的青少年,脊柱手法治疗(1-2 次/周,12 周,1 项研究性临床试验)加锻炼与单纯锻炼相比,更有可能减轻临床上重要的疼痛;8 周的集体锻炼(2 项研究性临床试验和 1 项非随机试验)可减轻疼痛强度。定性研究发现,通过教育/建议提供的信息以及治疗的依从性与有效治疗有关。未发现经济学研究或针对胸椎疼痛的研究:结论:脊柱手法治疗和集体锻炼可能有助于减轻青少年枸杞多糖症的程度。教育应作为护理计划的一部分。总体证据稀少。需要进行方法严谨的研究:CDR42019135009 (PROCERMO)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信