Sulforaphane protects against LPS-induced liver injury in mice by antagonizing oxidative stress and apoptosis through AMPK activation.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rasha A Mansouri, Huda F Alshaibi, May M Alqurashi, Maimoonah M Shaikh, Khulud A Bahaidrah, Noor A Alzahrani
{"title":"Sulforaphane protects against LPS-induced liver injury in mice by antagonizing oxidative stress and apoptosis through AMPK activation.","authors":"Rasha A Mansouri, Huda F Alshaibi, May M Alqurashi, Maimoonah M Shaikh, Khulud A Bahaidrah, Noor A Alzahrani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given the adverse effect of liver injury on a multitude of body functions, it is vital to understand its underlying mechanism and how to overcome it. In this study, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used to induce liver injury, while sulforaphane (SFN), a natural phytochemical, was used as the antagonist to overcome the deleterious effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four mice were divided into three groups: Control group (0.9% saline), LPS induction group (0.75 mg/kg), and SFN treatment (25 mg/kg) followed by LPS induction group (0.75 mg/kg), all with access to food and water <i>ad libitum</i>. Blood samples from retro-orbital sinus were used to measure liver function through two aminotransferases (i.e., alanine transaminase [ALT] and aspartate transaminase [AST]) whereas liver homogenate was used to measure glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (antioxidant activity markers); caspase-3 (apoptosis marker); malondialdehyde (MDA) (lipid peroxidation marker); and NO. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a cellular energy homeostasis and lipid metabolism sensor, was also measured. Statistical analysis including normalization, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and significance of <i>P</i> < 0.05 were applied to all collected data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SFN treatment significantly attenuated all tests compared to the induced liver injury by LPS where significant reduction was observed in the levels of hepatic function markers (AST and ALT), lipid peroxidation marker (MDA) as well as apoptosis marker (caspase-3) whereas a marked increase was observed for antioxidant activity markers (SOD, CAT, and GSH) and AMPK.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate the protective effect of SFN as it re-instated the levels of antioxidation while decreasing the level of the biomarkers, which were significantly increased during liver injury induction by LPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":47093,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS","volume":"18 3","pages":"39-47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Given the adverse effect of liver injury on a multitude of body functions, it is vital to understand its underlying mechanism and how to overcome it. In this study, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was used to induce liver injury, while sulforaphane (SFN), a natural phytochemical, was used as the antagonist to overcome the deleterious effect.

Methods: Twenty-four mice were divided into three groups: Control group (0.9% saline), LPS induction group (0.75 mg/kg), and SFN treatment (25 mg/kg) followed by LPS induction group (0.75 mg/kg), all with access to food and water ad libitum. Blood samples from retro-orbital sinus were used to measure liver function through two aminotransferases (i.e., alanine transaminase [ALT] and aspartate transaminase [AST]) whereas liver homogenate was used to measure glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (antioxidant activity markers); caspase-3 (apoptosis marker); malondialdehyde (MDA) (lipid peroxidation marker); and NO. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a cellular energy homeostasis and lipid metabolism sensor, was also measured. Statistical analysis including normalization, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and significance of P < 0.05 were applied to all collected data.

Results: SFN treatment significantly attenuated all tests compared to the induced liver injury by LPS where significant reduction was observed in the levels of hepatic function markers (AST and ALT), lipid peroxidation marker (MDA) as well as apoptosis marker (caspase-3) whereas a marked increase was observed for antioxidant activity markers (SOD, CAT, and GSH) and AMPK.

Conclusion: These results indicate the protective effect of SFN as it re-instated the levels of antioxidation while decreasing the level of the biomarkers, which were significantly increased during liver injury induction by LPS.

红景天通过激活 AMPK 对抗氧化应激和细胞凋亡,保护小鼠免受 LPS 引起的肝损伤。
研究目的鉴于肝损伤对人体多种功能的不利影响,了解其潜在机制以及如何克服肝损伤至关重要。本研究采用脂多糖(LPS)诱导肝损伤,并以天然植物化学物质苏拉叶烷(SFN)作为拮抗剂来克服肝损伤的有害影响:方法:24 只小鼠分为三组:方法:将 24 只小鼠分为三组:对照组(0.9% 生理盐水)、LPS 诱导组(0.75 mg/kg)、SFN 处理组(25 mg/kg)和 LPS 诱导组(0.75 mg/kg)。眶后窦的血液样本用于通过两种转氨酶(即丙氨酸转氨酶[ALT]和天冬氨酸转氨酶[AST])测量肝功能,而肝匀浆则用于测量谷胱甘肽(GSH)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)(抗氧化活性标志物)、Caspase-3(细胞凋亡标志物)、丙二醛(MDA)(脂质过氧化标志物)和 NO。此外,还测量了细胞能量平衡和脂质代谢传感器 AMP 激活蛋白激酶(AMPK)。对所有收集的数据进行了统计分析,包括归一化、方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验和P < 0.05的显著性检验:结果:与 LPS 诱导的肝损伤相比,SFN 治疗明显减轻了所有测试,其中肝功能指标(AST 和 ALT)、脂质过氧化指标(MDA)以及细胞凋亡指标(caspase-3)的水平明显下降,而抗氧化活性指标(SOD、CAT 和 GSH)和 AMPK 的水平则明显上升:这些结果表明了 SFN 的保护作用,因为它能恢复抗氧化水平,同时降低生物标志物的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS
International Journal of Health Sciences-IJHS MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信