The Wise-Use Checklist as a Science–Policy Interface– The Interaction of Science and Policy in Taiwanese Wetland Conservation Policy

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Chen-Guang Lee
{"title":"The Wise-Use Checklist as a Science–Policy Interface– The Interaction of Science and Policy in Taiwanese Wetland Conservation Policy","authors":"Chen-Guang Lee","doi":"10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ‘Wise-Use Checklist’ was designed to assist people in formulating the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’ in Taiwanese wetland conservation policy programme. Feedback from the planning teams, however, indicated that the checklist was difficult to use. Therefore, this research employed the perspective of science–policy interface to understand the barriers people were experiencing while implementing the checklist and identify the factors influencing the governance between science and policy in wetland conservation. The study mainly focused on the period from 2013 to 2015, when the wetland conservation policy was transformed into legislation and regulations in Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the thoughts of planners who participated in the formulation of the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’. The interviews revealed that the main barrier to the planners was the uncertainty produced by perception divergence, technical difficulties, and policy–institutional barriers, rather than the checklist itself. The responses identified tensions and governance issues among the scientists and between the scientists and policymakers with respect to wetland conservation policies. The research yielded two findings in the aspect of the science-policy interfaces themselves, and six areas for discussion in the aspect of governance between wetland scientists and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23640,"journal":{"name":"Wetlands","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wetlands","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-024-01810-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘Wise-Use Checklist’ was designed to assist people in formulating the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’ in Taiwanese wetland conservation policy programme. Feedback from the planning teams, however, indicated that the checklist was difficult to use. Therefore, this research employed the perspective of science–policy interface to understand the barriers people were experiencing while implementing the checklist and identify the factors influencing the governance between science and policy in wetland conservation. The study mainly focused on the period from 2013 to 2015, when the wetland conservation policy was transformed into legislation and regulations in Taiwan. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the thoughts of planners who participated in the formulation of the ‘Conservation–Utilisation Plans for Wetlands of Importance’. The interviews revealed that the main barrier to the planners was the uncertainty produced by perception divergence, technical difficulties, and policy–institutional barriers, rather than the checklist itself. The responses identified tensions and governance issues among the scientists and between the scientists and policymakers with respect to wetland conservation policies. The research yielded two findings in the aspect of the science-policy interfaces themselves, and six areas for discussion in the aspect of governance between wetland scientists and policymakers.

Abstract Image

作为科学与政策接口的智用清单--台湾湿地保护政策中的科学与政策互动
智用清单 "旨在帮助人们制定台湾湿地保护政策计划中的 "重要湿地保护-利用计划"。然而,规划团队的反馈表明,该清单难以使用。因此,本研究采用科学与政策接口的视角来了解人们在实施核对表时遇到的障碍,并找出影响湿地保护中科学与政策之间治理的因素。研究主要集中在 2013 年至 2015 年期间,即台湾湿地保护政策转化为法律法规的时期。研究采用半结构式访谈,了解参与制定 "重要湿地保育利用计划 "的规划人员的想法。访谈结果显示,规划人员面临的主要障碍是观念分歧、技术困难和政策制度障碍所带来的不确定性,而不是清单本身。访谈中还发现了科学家之间以及科学家与决策者之间在湿地保护政策方面存在的紧张关系和管理问题。这项研究在科学-政策界面本身方面有两项发现,在湿地科学家与决策者之间的管理方面有六个讨论领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wetlands
Wetlands 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4.0 months
期刊介绍: Wetlands is an international journal concerned with all aspects of wetlands biology, ecology, hydrology, water chemistry, soil and sediment characteristics, management, and laws and regulations. The journal is published 6 times per year, with the goal of centralizing the publication of pioneering wetlands work that has otherwise been spread among a myriad of journals. Since wetlands research usually requires an interdisciplinary approach, the journal in not limited to specific disciplines but seeks manuscripts reporting research results from all relevant disciplines. Manuscripts focusing on management topics and regulatory considerations relevant to wetlands are also suitable. Submissions may be in the form of articles or short notes. Timely review articles will also be considered, but the subject and content should be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief (NDSU.wetlands.editor@ndsu.edu) prior to submission. All papers published in Wetlands are reviewed by two qualified peers, an Associate Editor, and the Editor-in-Chief prior to acceptance and publication. All papers must present new information, must be factual and original, and must not have been published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信