Impact of different organic acids on heat-moisture treated potato starch for enhancing prebiotic potential

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Soo Jin Yu, Kwang Yeon Lee, Hyeon Gyu Lee
{"title":"Impact of different organic acids on heat-moisture treated potato starch for enhancing prebiotic potential","authors":"Soo Jin Yu,&nbsp;Kwang Yeon Lee,&nbsp;Hyeon Gyu Lee","doi":"10.1007/s10068-024-01575-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research verified the in vitro digestive properties of potato starch modified with citric acid (CA), malic acid (MA), and tartaric acid (TA), and evaluated its prebiotic potential. The resistant starch (RS) content in CA- or MA-modified starch was greater than that in native starch. Furthermore, after cooking, all modified starches exhibited an increase in RS content by 2.3 to 3.3 times compared to native starch, which has a 29.81% RS content, demonstrating high thermal stability. Probiotic bacteria demonstrated increased viability, raiging form 6.38–6.85 log CFU/mL, when cultured with modified starch, in contrast to 4.48 log CFU/mL with glucose. During animal testing, modified starches consistently improved gastrointestinal transit, fecal moisture, and lipid levels. Notably, CA-, MA- or TA-modified starches promoted beneficial bacteria growth by providing short-chain fatty acids, with CA-modified starch proving to be the most potent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":566,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"33 14","pages":"3347 - 3356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10068-024-01575-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research verified the in vitro digestive properties of potato starch modified with citric acid (CA), malic acid (MA), and tartaric acid (TA), and evaluated its prebiotic potential. The resistant starch (RS) content in CA- or MA-modified starch was greater than that in native starch. Furthermore, after cooking, all modified starches exhibited an increase in RS content by 2.3 to 3.3 times compared to native starch, which has a 29.81% RS content, demonstrating high thermal stability. Probiotic bacteria demonstrated increased viability, raiging form 6.38–6.85 log CFU/mL, when cultured with modified starch, in contrast to 4.48 log CFU/mL with glucose. During animal testing, modified starches consistently improved gastrointestinal transit, fecal moisture, and lipid levels. Notably, CA-, MA- or TA-modified starches promoted beneficial bacteria growth by providing short-chain fatty acids, with CA-modified starch proving to be the most potent.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同有机酸对热水分处理马铃薯淀粉提高益生元潜力的影响
这项研究验证了用柠檬酸(CA)、苹果酸(MA)和酒石酸(TA)改性的马铃薯淀粉的体外消化特性,并评估了其益生潜力。CA或MA改性淀粉中的抗性淀粉(RS)含量高于原生淀粉。此外,在烹饪后,所有改性淀粉的抗性淀粉含量都比原生淀粉增加了 2.3 至 3.3 倍,原生淀粉的抗性淀粉含量为 29.81%,这表明改性淀粉具有很高的热稳定性。使用变性淀粉培养益生菌时,益生菌的存活率提高了,达到 6.38-6.85 log CFU/mL,而使用葡萄糖时为 4.48 log CFU/mL。在动物试验中,变性淀粉可持续改善胃肠道转运、粪便水分和脂质水平。值得注意的是,CA、MA 或 TA 改性淀粉通过提供短链脂肪酸促进了有益细菌的生长,其中 CA 改性淀粉的功效最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science and Biotechnology
Food Science and Biotechnology FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The FSB journal covers food chemistry and analysis for compositional and physiological activity changes, food hygiene and toxicology, food microbiology and biotechnology, and food engineering involved in during and after food processing through physical, chemical, and biological ways. Consumer perception and sensory evaluation on processed foods are accepted only when they are relevant to the laboratory research work. As a general rule, manuscripts dealing with analysis and efficacy of extracts from natural resources prior to the processing or without any related food processing may not be considered within the scope of the journal. The FSB journal does not deal with only local interest and a lack of significant scientific merit. The main scope of our journal is seeking for human health and wellness through constructive works and new findings in food science and biotechnology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信