The Landscape of Health Technology for Equity Deserving Groups in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review.

Lindsay Burton, Fathi Milad, Robert Janke, Kathy L Rush
{"title":"The Landscape of Health Technology for Equity Deserving Groups in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lindsay Burton, Fathi Milad, Robert Janke, Kathy L Rush","doi":"10.1177/2752535X241252208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Equity-deserving groups face well-known health disparities that are exacerbated by rural residence. Health technologies have shown promise in reducing disparities among these groups, but there has been no comprehensive evidence synthesis of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the patient, healthcare, and economic outcomes of health technology applications with rural living equity-deserving groups.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The databases searched included Medline and Embase. Articles were assessed for bias using the McGill mixed methods appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Data were synthesized narratively using a convergent integrated approach for qualitative and quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This evidence synthesis includes papers (<i>n</i> = 21) that reported on health technologies targeting rural equity-deserving groups. Overall, patient outcomes - knowledge, self-efficacy, weight loss, and clinical indicators - improved. Healthcare access improved with greater convenience, flexibility, time and travel savings, though travel was still occasionally necessary. All studies reported satisfaction with health technologies. Technology challenges reported related to connectivity and infrastructure issues influencing appointment quality and modality options. While some studies reported additional costs, overall, studies indicated cost savings for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of research on health technologies targeting rural equity-deserving groups, and the available research has primarily focused on women. While current evidence was primarily of high quality, research is needed inclusive of equity-deserving groups and interventions co-designed with users that integrate culturally sensitive approaches. Review registered with Prospero ID = CRD42021285994.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X241252208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X241252208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Equity-deserving groups face well-known health disparities that are exacerbated by rural residence. Health technologies have shown promise in reducing disparities among these groups, but there has been no comprehensive evidence synthesis of outcomes.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the patient, healthcare, and economic outcomes of health technology applications with rural living equity-deserving groups.

Research design: The databases searched included Medline and Embase. Articles were assessed for bias using the McGill mixed methods appraisal tool.

Analysis: Data were synthesized narratively using a convergent integrated approach for qualitative and quantitative findings.

Results: This evidence synthesis includes papers (n = 21) that reported on health technologies targeting rural equity-deserving groups. Overall, patient outcomes - knowledge, self-efficacy, weight loss, and clinical indicators - improved. Healthcare access improved with greater convenience, flexibility, time and travel savings, though travel was still occasionally necessary. All studies reported satisfaction with health technologies. Technology challenges reported related to connectivity and infrastructure issues influencing appointment quality and modality options. While some studies reported additional costs, overall, studies indicated cost savings for patients.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of research on health technologies targeting rural equity-deserving groups, and the available research has primarily focused on women. While current evidence was primarily of high quality, research is needed inclusive of equity-deserving groups and interventions co-designed with users that integrate culturally sensitive approaches. Review registered with Prospero ID = CRD42021285994.

为农村社区需要公平的群体提供医疗技术的情况:系统回顾
背景:需要公平对待的群体面临着众所周知的健康差距,而居住在农村地区又加剧了这种差距。目的:本系统性综述旨在研究医疗技术应用于农村生活中需要公平对待的群体在患者、医疗保健和经济方面的结果:研究设计:检索的数据库包括 Medline 和 Embase。使用麦吉尔混合方法评估工具对文章进行偏差评估:分析:采用定性和定量研究结果的聚合综合方法对数据进行叙述性综合:本证据综述包括报告针对农村需要公平的群体的医疗技术的论文(n = 21)。总体而言,患者的治疗效果--知识、自我效能、体重减轻和临床指标--都有所改善。医疗服务的获取得到了改善,更加方便、灵活,节省了时间和旅行,尽管有时仍需要旅行。所有研究都对医疗技术表示满意。所报告的技术挑战涉及影响预约质量和方式选择的连接性和基础设施问题。虽然一些研究报告了额外的成本,但总体而言,研究表明为患者节省了成本:针对农村需要公平的群体的医疗技术研究很少,现有的研究主要集中在妇女身上。虽然目前的证据主要是高质量的,但还需要开展包括需要公平的群体在内的研究,以及与用户共同设计的干预措施,这些干预措施应结合文化敏感性方法。评论已注册,Prospero ID = CRD42021285994。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信