Comparison of Cardiovascular Health Between Parents and Non-Parents in NHANES 2011-2018.

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES

Family & Community Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403

Emily F Gregory, Adya I Maddox, Alyssa Tindall, Jose L Ibarra, Senbagam Virudachalam

{"title":"Comparison of Cardiovascular Health Between Parents and Non-Parents in NHANES 2011-2018.","authors":"Emily F Gregory, Adya I Maddox, Alyssa Tindall, Jose L Ibarra, Senbagam Virudachalam","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: We compared cardiovascular health for parents and non-parents using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8).Methods: This cross-sectional cohort analyzed 2011-2018 NHANES participants aged 20 to 54. The exposure was parenting, defined as living with a child. Logistic regression assessed whether parenting was associated with odds of ideal LE8 total or sub-scores. Regression adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and income. Subgroups included female sex, male sex, income <150% federal poverty levels, and parents of younger children.Results: 6847 participants represented a weighted population of 79 120 285 (57% parents). Parenting was not associated with adjusted odds of ideal total LE8 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09). Parenting was associated with decreased odds of ideal body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) and increased odds of smoking avoidance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38). Associations varied by subgroup. Only the subgroup with lower incomes demonstrated reduced odds of ideal total LE8 for parents (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82).Conclusions: Parents and non-parents differed in smoking and BMI, though not in LE8 total. Families with low incomes may particularly benefit from dual generation cardiovascular risk reduction.","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"231-238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: We compared cardiovascular health for parents and non-parents using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8).

Methods: This cross-sectional cohort analyzed 2011-2018 NHANES participants aged 20 to 54. The exposure was parenting, defined as living with a child. Logistic regression assessed whether parenting was associated with odds of ideal LE8 total or sub-scores. Regression adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, and income. Subgroups included female sex, male sex, income <150% federal poverty levels, and parents of younger children.

Results: 6847 participants represented a weighted population of 79 120 285 (57% parents). Parenting was not associated with adjusted odds of ideal total LE8 (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.09). Parenting was associated with decreased odds of ideal body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) and increased odds of smoking avoidance (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.38). Associations varied by subgroup. Only the subgroup with lower incomes demonstrated reduced odds of ideal total LE8 for parents (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82).

Conclusions: Parents and non-parents differed in smoking and BMI, though not in LE8 total. Families with low incomes may particularly benefit from dual generation cardiovascular risk reduction.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2011-2018 年 NHANES 中父母与非父母的心血管健康比较。

背景和目的：我们使用美国心脏协会的生活必备 8 项指标（LE8）比较了父母和非父母的心血管健康状况：我们使用美国心脏协会的生活必备 8 项指标（LE8）比较了父母和非父母的心血管健康状况：该横断面队列分析了 2011-2018 年 20 至 54 岁的 NHANES 参与者。暴露是指养育子女，定义为与子女生活在一起。逻辑回归评估了养育子女是否与理想的 LE8 总分或子分数的几率有关。回归调整了年龄、性别、种族和民族、教育程度、婚姻状况和收入。分组包括女性性别、男性性别和收入：6847 名参与者代表了 79 120 285 名加权人口（57% 为父母）。养育子女与理想总 LE8 的调整几率无关（OR 0.91，95% CI 0.76-1.09）。养育子女与理想体重指数（BMI）降低的几率（OR 0.81，95% CI 0.72-0.91）和避免吸烟几率增加的几率（OR 1.22，95% CI 1.09-1.38）有关。不同亚组的相关性各不相同。只有收入较低的亚组显示出父母理想总 LE8 的几率降低（OR 0.58，95% CI 0.41-0.82）：父母和非父母在吸烟和体重指数方面存在差异，但在LE8总量方面没有差异。低收入家庭可能特别受益于双代心血管风险降低。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Family & Community Health Multiple-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.